Preventing Wrong Tooth Extraction.

IF 1.4 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Oliver Jacob, Evelyn Gough, Heidi Thomas
{"title":"Preventing Wrong Tooth Extraction.","authors":"Oliver Jacob,&nbsp;Evelyn Gough,&nbsp;Heidi Thomas","doi":"10.15644/asc55/3/9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective of work: </strong>Wrong-site tooth extraction (WSTE) is the most common serious patient safety incident in dentistry. Safety checklists have significantly reduced wrong-site surgery, although their benefit is unproven in primary care dentistry. Our quality improvement project developed and implemented a checklist optimised for oral surgery procedures in primary care to reduce WSTE risk.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Local best practice for tooth extraction record-keeping (LBP), using national guidelines and standards was devised. We then retrospectively audited tooth extraction record-keeping against LBP. Deficiencies in current record-keeping practice were identified and used to design a checklist aimed at improving compliance. We provided a computerised safety checklist compliant with LBP to eleven clinicians at three general dental clinics within our region. The checklist included a pre-operative safety check, a pause to re-confirm the surgical site and a post-operative record-keeping proforma. The checklist was linked to our record-keeping software for use during tooth extraction. We audited checklist completion and compliance with LBP fortnightly for ten weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The introduction of a safety checklist resulted in increased compliance with LBP for tooth extraction record keeping. At week ten, 67% of records contained the computerised safety checklist. This resulted in a 50% increase in overall compliance with LBP for tooth extraction compared to baseline.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A computerised safety checklist for tooth extraction in primary care has potential to improve patient safety by adopting measures to prevent WSTE and standardising communication between clinicians. Checklists in general practice should be encouraged.</p>","PeriodicalId":7154,"journal":{"name":"Acta Stomatologica Croatica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9b/86/ASC_55(3)_316-324.PMC8514230.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Stomatologica Croatica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15644/asc55/3/9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective of work: Wrong-site tooth extraction (WSTE) is the most common serious patient safety incident in dentistry. Safety checklists have significantly reduced wrong-site surgery, although their benefit is unproven in primary care dentistry. Our quality improvement project developed and implemented a checklist optimised for oral surgery procedures in primary care to reduce WSTE risk.

Material and methods: Local best practice for tooth extraction record-keeping (LBP), using national guidelines and standards was devised. We then retrospectively audited tooth extraction record-keeping against LBP. Deficiencies in current record-keeping practice were identified and used to design a checklist aimed at improving compliance. We provided a computerised safety checklist compliant with LBP to eleven clinicians at three general dental clinics within our region. The checklist included a pre-operative safety check, a pause to re-confirm the surgical site and a post-operative record-keeping proforma. The checklist was linked to our record-keeping software for use during tooth extraction. We audited checklist completion and compliance with LBP fortnightly for ten weeks.

Results: The introduction of a safety checklist resulted in increased compliance with LBP for tooth extraction record keeping. At week ten, 67% of records contained the computerised safety checklist. This resulted in a 50% increase in overall compliance with LBP for tooth extraction compared to baseline.

Conclusions: A computerised safety checklist for tooth extraction in primary care has potential to improve patient safety by adopting measures to prevent WSTE and standardising communication between clinicians. Checklists in general practice should be encouraged.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

防止错误拔牙。
工作目的:错误位置拔牙(WSTE)是牙科最常见的严重患者安全事件。安全检查表大大减少了错误的手术部位,尽管它们的好处尚未在初级保健牙科得到证实。我们的质量改进项目制定并实施了一份优化的初级保健口腔手术检查清单,以减少废弃物的风险。材料和方法:采用国家指南和标准,设计了拔牙记录保存(LBP)的本地最佳实践。然后我们根据LBP对拔牙记录进行回顾性审核。确定了当前记录保存做法中的不足之处,并用来设计一份旨在改进遵守情况的核对表。我们向本地区三家普通牙科诊所的11名临床医生提供了一份符合LBP标准的电脑化安全检查表。检查表包括术前安全检查,暂停以重新确认手术部位和术后记录保存形式。检查表与我们的记录保存软件相关联,供拔牙时使用。我们每两周审核一次检查表的完成情况和对LBP的遵守情况,为期十周。结果:安全检查表的引入增加了拔牙记录的依从性。在第10周,67%的记录包含了计算机化的安全清单。与基线相比,这导致LBP拔牙的总体依从性增加了50%。结论:在初级保健中,计算机化的拔牙安全检查表有可能通过采取措施防止浪费和规范临床医生之间的沟通来提高患者的安全。在一般实践中应该鼓励使用检查清单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Stomatologica Croatica
Acta Stomatologica Croatica DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
28.60%
发文量
32
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Acta Stomatologica Croatica (ASCRO) is a leading scientific non-profit journal in the field of dental, oral and cranio-facial sciences during the past 44 years in Croatia. ASCRO publishes original scientific and clinical papers, preliminary communications, case reports, book reviews, letters to the editor and news. Review articles are published by invitation from the Editor-in-Chief by acclaimed professionals in distinct fields of dental medicine. All manuscripts are subjected to peer review process.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信