Mathew Creighton, Daniel Capistrano, Agnieszka Sorokowska, Piotr Sorokowski
{"title":"Physical Spacing and Social Interaction Before the Global Pandemic.","authors":"Mathew Creighton, Daniel Capistrano, Agnieszka Sorokowska, Piotr Sorokowski","doi":"10.1007/s40980-021-00100-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Subsequent to the arrival of SARS-CoV-2 and emergence of COVID-19, policy to limit the further spread has focused on increasing distance between individuals when interacting, often termed social distancing although physical distancing is more accurate (Das Gupta and Wong in Canadian J Public Health 111:488-489, 2020; Gale in Is 'social distancing' the wrong term? Expert prefers 'physical distancing,' and the WHO agrees. The Washington Post, 2020; Sørensen et al. in Glob Health Promot, 28:5-14, 2021), and limiting the frequency of interaction by limiting/prohibiting non-essential and large-scale social gatherings. This research note focuses on social spacing, defined by distance and interaction, to offer a cross-cultural insight into social distancing and social interactions in the pre-pandemic period. Combining unique data on frequency of contact, religious service attendance and preferred interpersonal spacing in 20 countries, this research note considers variation in the extent to which physical distance was already practiced without official recommendations and underscores notable cross-cultural variation in the extent to which social interaction occurred. Results suggest that policy intervention should emphasize certain behavioral changes based on pre-existing context-specific patterns of interaction and interpersonal spacing rather than a one-size-fits-all approach. This research note is a descriptive first step that allows unique insight into social spacing and contact prior to the spread of SARS-CoV-2. It provides a baseline typology and a reference for future work on the cross-cultural implications of COVID-19 for pre-pandemic socio-cultural practice and vice versa.</p>","PeriodicalId":43022,"journal":{"name":"Spatial Demography","volume":"10 1","pages":"107-116"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8513564/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spatial Demography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40980-021-00100-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Subsequent to the arrival of SARS-CoV-2 and emergence of COVID-19, policy to limit the further spread has focused on increasing distance between individuals when interacting, often termed social distancing although physical distancing is more accurate (Das Gupta and Wong in Canadian J Public Health 111:488-489, 2020; Gale in Is 'social distancing' the wrong term? Expert prefers 'physical distancing,' and the WHO agrees. The Washington Post, 2020; Sørensen et al. in Glob Health Promot, 28:5-14, 2021), and limiting the frequency of interaction by limiting/prohibiting non-essential and large-scale social gatherings. This research note focuses on social spacing, defined by distance and interaction, to offer a cross-cultural insight into social distancing and social interactions in the pre-pandemic period. Combining unique data on frequency of contact, religious service attendance and preferred interpersonal spacing in 20 countries, this research note considers variation in the extent to which physical distance was already practiced without official recommendations and underscores notable cross-cultural variation in the extent to which social interaction occurred. Results suggest that policy intervention should emphasize certain behavioral changes based on pre-existing context-specific patterns of interaction and interpersonal spacing rather than a one-size-fits-all approach. This research note is a descriptive first step that allows unique insight into social spacing and contact prior to the spread of SARS-CoV-2. It provides a baseline typology and a reference for future work on the cross-cultural implications of COVID-19 for pre-pandemic socio-cultural practice and vice versa.
在SARS-CoV-2到来和COVID-19出现之后,限制进一步传播的政策侧重于在互动时增加个人之间的距离,通常称为社交距离,尽管物理距离更准确(Das Gupta和Wong in Canadian J Public Health 111:488-489, 2020;“社交距离”是一个错误的术语吗?专家更倾向于“保持身体距离”,世卫组织也同意这一点。《华盛顿邮报》,2020;Sørensen等(Glob Health promotion, 28:5- 14,2021),并通过限制/禁止非必要的大型社交聚会来限制互动频率。本研究说明侧重于由距离和互动定义的社会间隔,以跨文化视角了解大流行前时期的社会距离和社会互动。结合20个国家接触频率、宗教服务出席率和首选人际间隔的独特数据,本研究报告考虑了在没有官方建议的情况下已经实践物理距离的程度的差异,并强调了社会互动发生程度的显著跨文化差异。结果表明,政策干预应强调基于已有的特定情境的互动模式和人际间隔的某些行为改变,而不是一刀切的方法。这份研究报告是描述性的第一步,可以对SARS-CoV-2传播前的社会间隔和接触有独特的了解。它为未来关于COVID-19对大流行前社会文化实践的跨文化影响的工作提供了基准类型和参考,反之亦然。
期刊介绍:
Spatial Demography focuses on understanding the spatial and spatiotemporal dimension of demographic processes. More specifically, the journal is interested in submissions that include the innovative use and adoption of spatial concepts, geospatial data, spatial technologies, and spatial analytic methods that further our understanding of demographic and policy-related related questions. The journal publishes both substantive and methodological papers from across the discipline of demography and its related fields (including economics, geography, sociology, anthropology, environmental science) and in applications ranging from local to global scale. In addition to research articles the journal will consider for publication review essays, book reviews, and reports/reviews on data, software, and instructional resources.