Frozen-Permanent Section Discrepancy Rate in Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

IF 4.1
Head and neck pathology Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-16 DOI:10.1007/s12105-021-01385-7
Serenella Serinelli, Stephanie M Bryant, Michael P A Williams, Mark Marzouk, Daniel J Zaccarini
{"title":"Frozen-Permanent Section Discrepancy Rate in Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.","authors":"Serenella Serinelli,&nbsp;Stephanie M Bryant,&nbsp;Michael P A Williams,&nbsp;Mark Marzouk,&nbsp;Daniel J Zaccarini","doi":"10.1007/s12105-021-01385-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Frozen section evaluation of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is critical for margin status and subsequent patient therapy. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the rate of frozen-permanent section discrepancies in blocks with two frozen section levels compared to ≥ three levels in oral cavity and oropharyngeal SCCs. A search of the cases with both intraoperative frozen sections and corresponding permanent sections for SCCs in the oral cavity and oropharynx was performed. Frozen sections and permanent slides were compared. The nature of discrepancies was assigned to one of the following: change in diagnosis, margin status, or distance of the tumor from the margin. The cause of the discrepancy was designated as one of the following: block sampling, gross sampling, interpretation, or technical error. The pathologist experience, frozen section technical experience, and intraoperative impact of each discrepancy were also evaluated. A total of 654 frozen and corresponding permanent blocks were assessed. For 532 of the frozen section blocks, two levels were cut, while 122 frozen section blocks had ≥ three levels. Thirty-five frozen-permanent section discrepancies were observed (5.4% of all blocks). Among these, 2.5% had a possible or definitive intraoperative impact. The percentage of discrepancies in the ≥ three levels group (5.7%) was slightly higher than the two-level group (5.3%), and this difference was not statistically significant. For the two-level group, the overall block sampling error rate was 4.5%. This was not significantly different from the 4.1% block sampling error rate seen in the ≥ three levels group. The rate of block sampling discrepancy did not show significant differences based on attending or frozen section technical experience. A change in margin distance (closer margin detected on permanent) occurred in 4% of the blocks and involved 16% of the patients. This review of oral cavity and oropharynx SCCs frozen/permanent section discrepancies shows that the error rate is not significantly different depending on the number of levels cut. The results suggest that always performing more than two frozen section levels may not yield a decreased discrepancy rate. A change in margin distance occurred quite frequently, but only in rare cases it had a definitive impact on the intraoperative management. Given the importance of correct intraoperative diagnosis in patient management, additional levels may be warranted depending on the clinical scenario.</p>","PeriodicalId":520636,"journal":{"name":"Head and neck pathology","volume":" ","pages":"466-475"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9187809/pdf/12105_2021_Article_1385.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head and neck pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-021-01385-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Frozen section evaluation of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is critical for margin status and subsequent patient therapy. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the rate of frozen-permanent section discrepancies in blocks with two frozen section levels compared to ≥ three levels in oral cavity and oropharyngeal SCCs. A search of the cases with both intraoperative frozen sections and corresponding permanent sections for SCCs in the oral cavity and oropharynx was performed. Frozen sections and permanent slides were compared. The nature of discrepancies was assigned to one of the following: change in diagnosis, margin status, or distance of the tumor from the margin. The cause of the discrepancy was designated as one of the following: block sampling, gross sampling, interpretation, or technical error. The pathologist experience, frozen section technical experience, and intraoperative impact of each discrepancy were also evaluated. A total of 654 frozen and corresponding permanent blocks were assessed. For 532 of the frozen section blocks, two levels were cut, while 122 frozen section blocks had ≥ three levels. Thirty-five frozen-permanent section discrepancies were observed (5.4% of all blocks). Among these, 2.5% had a possible or definitive intraoperative impact. The percentage of discrepancies in the ≥ three levels group (5.7%) was slightly higher than the two-level group (5.3%), and this difference was not statistically significant. For the two-level group, the overall block sampling error rate was 4.5%. This was not significantly different from the 4.1% block sampling error rate seen in the ≥ three levels group. The rate of block sampling discrepancy did not show significant differences based on attending or frozen section technical experience. A change in margin distance (closer margin detected on permanent) occurred in 4% of the blocks and involved 16% of the patients. This review of oral cavity and oropharynx SCCs frozen/permanent section discrepancies shows that the error rate is not significantly different depending on the number of levels cut. The results suggest that always performing more than two frozen section levels may not yield a decreased discrepancy rate. A change in margin distance occurred quite frequently, but only in rare cases it had a definitive impact on the intraoperative management. Given the importance of correct intraoperative diagnosis in patient management, additional levels may be warranted depending on the clinical scenario.

口腔和口咽鳞状细胞癌冷冻-永久切片差异率。
冷冻切片评价头颈部鳞状细胞癌(SCC)的边缘状态和随后的患者治疗是至关重要的。在这项研究中,我们回顾性地回顾了在口腔和口咽SCCs中,两个冰冻切片水平的块与≥三个冰冻切片水平的块的冷冻永久切片差异率。对术中冷冻切片和相应的口腔和口咽部SCCs永久切片进行了研究。将冷冻切片与永久切片进行比较。差异的性质被分配到以下之一:改变诊断,边缘状态,或肿瘤距离边缘。差异的原因被指定为以下其中一种:块抽样、总抽样、解释或技术错误。并对病理经验、冰冻切片技术经验及各差异对术中影响进行了评价。总共评估了654个冻结和相应的永久性块。532个冰冻切片切片被切割2层,122个冰冻切片切片被切割≥3层。观察到35例冷冻永久切片差异(占所有块的5.4%)。其中2.5%有可能或明确的术中影响。≥3个水平组的差异百分比(5.7%)略高于2个水平组(5.3%),差异无统计学意义。对于两级组,总体块抽样错误率为4.5%。这与≥3个水平组的4.1%的块抽样错误率没有显著差异。根据参加或冻结切片的技术经验,块抽样差异率没有显着差异。边缘距离的改变(在永久性牙块上检测到更近的边缘)发生在4%的牙块中,涉及16%的患者。这篇关于口腔和口咽SCCs冷冻/永久切片差异的综述表明,错误率并没有显著差异,这取决于切割水平的数量。结果表明,总是执行两个以上的冻结切片水平可能不会产生下降的差异率。切缘距离的改变经常发生,但只有在极少数情况下才会对术中处理产生决定性的影响。鉴于正确的术中诊断对患者管理的重要性,根据临床情况可能需要额外的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信