Precision Oncology in Metastatic Uterine Cancer; Croatian First-Year Experience of the Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in Everyday Clinical Practice.

Pathology oncology research : POR Pub Date : 2021-09-27 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.3389/pore.2021.1609963
Dora Čerina, Višnja Matković, Kristina Katić, Ingrid Belac Lovasić, Robert Šeparović, Ivana Canjko, Blanka Jakšić, Ana Fröbe, Stjepko Pleština, Žarko Bajić, Eduard Vrdoljak
{"title":"Precision Oncology in Metastatic Uterine Cancer; Croatian First-Year Experience of the Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in Everyday Clinical Practice.","authors":"Dora Čerina,&nbsp;Višnja Matković,&nbsp;Kristina Katić,&nbsp;Ingrid Belac Lovasić,&nbsp;Robert Šeparović,&nbsp;Ivana Canjko,&nbsp;Blanka Jakšić,&nbsp;Ana Fröbe,&nbsp;Stjepko Pleština,&nbsp;Žarko Bajić,&nbsp;Eduard Vrdoljak","doi":"10.3389/pore.2021.1609963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is gradually becoming an inevitable part of the everyday oncology clinical practice. The interpretation and optimal implementation of the results is one of the hot topics of modern-day oncology. According to the recent findings, uterine cancer harbors a high level of gene alterations but is still insufficiently explored. The primary goal of this project was to assess the proportion of patients with targetable mutations. Also, the aim was to define and emphasize potential opportunities as well as the problems we have faced in the first year of testing on the national level. We performed a multicentric, retrospective, nested cross-sectional analysis on the total population of Croatian patients with advanced/metastatic uterine cancer where the tumor CGP was performed during 2020. CGP of the tumor tissue of 32 patients revealed clinically relevant genomic alterations (CRGA) in 27 patients (84%) with a median of 3 (IQR 1-4) CRGA per patient. The most common CRGAs were those of phosphatide-inositol-3 kinases (PIK3) in 22 patients (69%), with 13/22 (59%) of those patients harboring PIK3CA mutation. The next most common CGRAs were ARID1A and PTEN mutations in 13 (41%) and 11 (34%) patients, respectively. Microsatellite status was determined as stable in 21 patients (66%) and highly unstable in 10 patients (31%). A high tumor mutational burden (≥10Muts/Mb) was reported in 12 patients (38%). CGP analysis reported some kind of targeted therapy for 28 patients (88%). CGP determined clinically relevant genomic alterations in the significant majority of patients with metastatic uterine cancer, defining it as a rich ground for further positioning and development of precision oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":411887,"journal":{"name":"Pathology oncology research : POR","volume":" ","pages":"1609963"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8504363/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathology oncology research : POR","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/pore.2021.1609963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is gradually becoming an inevitable part of the everyday oncology clinical practice. The interpretation and optimal implementation of the results is one of the hot topics of modern-day oncology. According to the recent findings, uterine cancer harbors a high level of gene alterations but is still insufficiently explored. The primary goal of this project was to assess the proportion of patients with targetable mutations. Also, the aim was to define and emphasize potential opportunities as well as the problems we have faced in the first year of testing on the national level. We performed a multicentric, retrospective, nested cross-sectional analysis on the total population of Croatian patients with advanced/metastatic uterine cancer where the tumor CGP was performed during 2020. CGP of the tumor tissue of 32 patients revealed clinically relevant genomic alterations (CRGA) in 27 patients (84%) with a median of 3 (IQR 1-4) CRGA per patient. The most common CRGAs were those of phosphatide-inositol-3 kinases (PIK3) in 22 patients (69%), with 13/22 (59%) of those patients harboring PIK3CA mutation. The next most common CGRAs were ARID1A and PTEN mutations in 13 (41%) and 11 (34%) patients, respectively. Microsatellite status was determined as stable in 21 patients (66%) and highly unstable in 10 patients (31%). A high tumor mutational burden (≥10Muts/Mb) was reported in 12 patients (38%). CGP analysis reported some kind of targeted therapy for 28 patients (88%). CGP determined clinically relevant genomic alterations in the significant majority of patients with metastatic uterine cancer, defining it as a rich ground for further positioning and development of precision oncology.

转移性子宫癌的精确肿瘤学研究克罗地亚在日常临床实践中综合基因组分析的第一年经验。
综合基因组谱分析(CGP)正逐渐成为日常肿瘤临床实践中不可避免的一部分。结果的解释和优化实施是现代肿瘤学的热门话题之一。根据最近的发现,子宫癌含有高水平的基因改变,但仍未充分探索。该项目的主要目标是评估具有靶向突变的患者比例。此外,目的是确定和强调潜在的机会以及我们在国家一级考试的第一年所面临的问题。我们对2020年期间进行肿瘤CGP的克罗地亚晚期/转移性子宫癌患者进行了多中心、回顾性、嵌套横断面分析。32例患者的肿瘤组织CGP显示27例(84%)患者有临床相关的基因组改变(CRGA),中位数为3 (IQR 1-4)个CRGA /患者。22例(69%)患者中最常见的CRGAs是磷脂-肌醇-3激酶(PIK3),其中13/22(59%)患者携带PIK3CA突变。其次常见的CGRAs是ARID1A和PTEN突变,分别发生在13例(41%)和11例(34%)患者中。21例(66%)患者的微卫星状态稳定,10例(31%)患者的微卫星状态高度不稳定。12例(38%)患者报告了高肿瘤突变负担(≥10Muts/Mb)。CGP分析报告了28例(88%)患者的某种靶向治疗。CGP在绝大多数转移性子宫癌患者中确定了临床相关的基因组改变,将其定义为进一步定位和发展精确肿瘤学的丰富基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信