Mixed-species groups in bats: non-random roost associations and roost selection in neotropical understory bats.

IF 2.6 2区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY
Detlev H Kelm, Ulf Toelch, Mirkka M Jones
{"title":"Mixed-species groups in bats: non-random roost associations and roost selection in neotropical understory bats.","authors":"Detlev H Kelm,&nbsp;Ulf Toelch,&nbsp;Mirkka M Jones","doi":"10.1186/s12983-021-00437-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mixed-species groups in animals have been shown to confer antipredator, foraging and other benefits to their members that may provide selective advantages. In most cases, however, it is unclear whether functional benefits are a principal driver of heterospecific groups, or whether groups simply result from simultaneous exploitation of common resources. Mixed-species groups that form independently of environmental conditions may, however, evidence direct benefits of species associations. Bats are among the most gregarious mammals, with sometimes thousands of individuals of various species roosting communally. Despite numerous potential functional benefits of such mixed-species roosting groups, interspecific attraction has never been shown. To explore alternative explanations for mixed-species roosting, we studied roost selection in a speciose neotropical understory bat community in lowland rainforest in Costa Rica. Long term roost data were recorded over 10 years in a total of 133 roosts comprising both natural roosts and structurally uniform artificial roosts. We modelled bat roost occupancy and abundance in each roost type and in forest and pasture habitats to quantify the effects of roost- and environmental variability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that bat species presence in natural roosts is predictable from habitat and structural roost parameters, but that the presence and abundance of other bat species further modifies roost choice. One third of the 12 study species were found to actively associate with selected other bat species in roosts (e.g. Glossophaga commissarisi with Carollia sowelli). Other species did not engage in communal roosting, which in some cases indicates a role for negative interspecific interactions, such as roost competition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mixed-species roosting may provide thermoregulatory benefits, reduce intraspecific competition and promote interspecific information transfer, and hence some heterospecific associations may be selected for in bats. Overall, our study contributes to an improved understanding of the array of factors that shape diverse tropical bat communities and drive the dynamics of heterospecific grouping in mammals more generally.</p>","PeriodicalId":55142,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Zoology","volume":"18 1","pages":"53"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8507185/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-021-00437-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Mixed-species groups in animals have been shown to confer antipredator, foraging and other benefits to their members that may provide selective advantages. In most cases, however, it is unclear whether functional benefits are a principal driver of heterospecific groups, or whether groups simply result from simultaneous exploitation of common resources. Mixed-species groups that form independently of environmental conditions may, however, evidence direct benefits of species associations. Bats are among the most gregarious mammals, with sometimes thousands of individuals of various species roosting communally. Despite numerous potential functional benefits of such mixed-species roosting groups, interspecific attraction has never been shown. To explore alternative explanations for mixed-species roosting, we studied roost selection in a speciose neotropical understory bat community in lowland rainforest in Costa Rica. Long term roost data were recorded over 10 years in a total of 133 roosts comprising both natural roosts and structurally uniform artificial roosts. We modelled bat roost occupancy and abundance in each roost type and in forest and pasture habitats to quantify the effects of roost- and environmental variability.

Results: We found that bat species presence in natural roosts is predictable from habitat and structural roost parameters, but that the presence and abundance of other bat species further modifies roost choice. One third of the 12 study species were found to actively associate with selected other bat species in roosts (e.g. Glossophaga commissarisi with Carollia sowelli). Other species did not engage in communal roosting, which in some cases indicates a role for negative interspecific interactions, such as roost competition.

Conclusions: Mixed-species roosting may provide thermoregulatory benefits, reduce intraspecific competition and promote interspecific information transfer, and hence some heterospecific associations may be selected for in bats. Overall, our study contributes to an improved understanding of the array of factors that shape diverse tropical bat communities and drive the dynamics of heterospecific grouping in mammals more generally.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

蝙蝠的混合物种群:新热带林下蝙蝠的非随机栖息地关联和栖息地选择。
背景:动物中的混合物种群体已被证明具有抗捕食者、觅食和其他可能提供选择优势的好处。然而,在大多数情况下,尚不清楚功能利益是否是异种群体的主要驱动因素,或者群体是否仅仅是同时利用共同资源的结果。然而,独立于环境条件而形成的混合物种群体可能证明物种关联的直接好处。蝙蝠是最群居的哺乳动物之一,有时会有成千上万的不同种类的个体共同栖息。尽管这种混合物种栖息群体具有许多潜在的功能优势,但从未显示出种间吸引力。为了探索混合物种栖息的其他解释,我们研究了哥斯达黎加低地雨林中新热带林下物种蝙蝠群落的栖息选择。在10年的时间里,我们记录了133个栖息地的长期数据,包括自然栖息地和结构均匀的人工栖息地。我们模拟了每种栖息类型以及森林和牧场栖息地的蝙蝠栖息率和丰度,以量化栖息和环境变化的影响。结果:我们发现蝙蝠在自然栖息地的存在可以通过栖息地的结构参数来预测,但其他蝙蝠物种的存在和丰度进一步改变了栖息选择。在12种研究物种中,发现有三分之一的物种在栖息地中与选定的其他蝙蝠物种积极联系(例如舌蝠与卡罗莱亚·索韦利)。其他物种不参与群落栖息,这在某些情况下表明了消极的种间相互作用的作用,如栖息地竞争。结论:混合种栖息可能具有体温调节优势,减少种内竞争,促进种间信息传递,因此在蝙蝠中可能选择了一些异种关联。总的来说,我们的研究有助于更好地理解形成不同热带蝙蝠群落的一系列因素,并更广泛地推动哺乳动物异种分组的动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Zoology is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal publishing high quality research articles and reviews on all aspects of animal life. As a biological discipline, zoology has one of the longest histories. Today it occasionally appears as though, due to the rapid expansion of life sciences, zoology has been replaced by more or less independent sub-disciplines amongst which exchange is often sparse. However, the recent advance of molecular methodology into "classical" fields of biology, and the development of theories that can explain phenomena on different levels of organisation, has led to a re-integration of zoological disciplines promoting a broader than usual approach to zoological questions. Zoology has re-emerged as an integrative discipline encompassing the most diverse aspects of animal life, from the level of the gene to the level of the ecosystem. Frontiers in Zoology is the first open access journal focusing on zoology as a whole. It aims to represent and re-unite the various disciplines that look at animal life from different perspectives and at providing the basis for a comprehensive understanding of zoological phenomena on all levels of analysis. Frontiers in Zoology provides a unique opportunity to publish high quality research and reviews on zoological issues that will be internationally accessible to any reader at no cost. The journal was initiated and is supported by the Deutsche Zoologische Gesellschaft, one of the largest national zoological societies with more than a century-long tradition in promoting high-level zoological research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信