Lina Castaño-Jaramillo, Carla Toledo-Salinas, David Mendoza
{"title":"[Causes and treatment of anaphylaxis in a Mexican third-level pediatric hospital].","authors":"Lina Castaño-Jaramillo, Carla Toledo-Salinas, David Mendoza","doi":"10.29262/ram.v68i3.904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To clinically characterize the events of anaphylaxis in a third-level pediatric hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>1148 clinical records were reviewed. Eventually, the information of 35 events of anaphylaxis in 20 patients was analyzed; three of them had multiple episodes of anaphylaxis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age for the anaphylactic episodes was 11 years (Interquartile range 10 years, Q1 = 5, Q3 = 15), predominantly in adolescents between the ages of 12 and 17 years, and there was a slight predominance in women. The most frequent clinical manifestations were cutaneous (86%), followed by respiratory (83%), cardiovascular (74%), and gastrointestinal (46%) alterations. Cardiac arrest was documented in three episodes; however, no anaphylaxis-related deaths were reported. The main triggers for anaphylaxis were food (34%), medications (29%), allergen-specific immunotherapy (14%), and latex (11%). In patients with perioperative anaphylaxis, the clinical behavior was severe. Epinephrine was administered in 27 out of the 35 events (77%), but only in 11 cases it was the first-line treatment. Systemic corticosteroids were the most frequently used treatment, followed by epinephrine and antihistamines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of epinephrine, which is the mainstay of the treatment, is suboptimal; with a preferred use of second-line medications like corticosteroids. Clear protocols for the diagnosis and treatment of anaphylaxis, as well as continuous education of health personnel, are necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":21175,"journal":{"name":"Revista alergia Mexico","volume":"68 3","pages":"160-164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista alergia Mexico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29262/ram.v68i3.904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objective: To clinically characterize the events of anaphylaxis in a third-level pediatric hospital.
Methods: 1148 clinical records were reviewed. Eventually, the information of 35 events of anaphylaxis in 20 patients was analyzed; three of them had multiple episodes of anaphylaxis.
Results: The median age for the anaphylactic episodes was 11 years (Interquartile range 10 years, Q1 = 5, Q3 = 15), predominantly in adolescents between the ages of 12 and 17 years, and there was a slight predominance in women. The most frequent clinical manifestations were cutaneous (86%), followed by respiratory (83%), cardiovascular (74%), and gastrointestinal (46%) alterations. Cardiac arrest was documented in three episodes; however, no anaphylaxis-related deaths were reported. The main triggers for anaphylaxis were food (34%), medications (29%), allergen-specific immunotherapy (14%), and latex (11%). In patients with perioperative anaphylaxis, the clinical behavior was severe. Epinephrine was administered in 27 out of the 35 events (77%), but only in 11 cases it was the first-line treatment. Systemic corticosteroids were the most frequently used treatment, followed by epinephrine and antihistamines.
Conclusions: The use of epinephrine, which is the mainstay of the treatment, is suboptimal; with a preferred use of second-line medications like corticosteroids. Clear protocols for the diagnosis and treatment of anaphylaxis, as well as continuous education of health personnel, are necessary.