Salvaging the Digit in Invasive Subungual Malignancies Using a Triple Technique under Awake Local Anesthesia.

IF 0.4 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Case Reports in Orthopedics Pub Date : 2021-09-30 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/4648627
Samer Abdel Al, Mohamad K Abou Chaar, Ala'a Aldeen Alkhatib, Muhamad Al-Qawasmi, Mohammad Barham, Sameer Yaser, Samer Salah, Abed Al Raheem Suleiman, Wafa Asha
{"title":"Salvaging the Digit in Invasive Subungual Malignancies Using a Triple Technique under Awake Local Anesthesia.","authors":"Samer Abdel Al,&nbsp;Mohamad K Abou Chaar,&nbsp;Ala'a Aldeen Alkhatib,&nbsp;Muhamad Al-Qawasmi,&nbsp;Mohammad Barham,&nbsp;Sameer Yaser,&nbsp;Samer Salah,&nbsp;Abed Al Raheem Suleiman,&nbsp;Wafa Asha","doi":"10.1155/2021/4648627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Amputation for subungual malignancy (SUM) was thought to be the gold standard in preventing recurrence and metastasis. The rationale behind this aggressive treatment was never based on scientific evidence. Even though multiple recent studies supported more conservative management by illustrating successful results of the digit salvage technique, especially for \"in situ\" SUM, this salvage approach is not well supported for the more aggressive type of the \"invasive\" SUM; herein, we salvaged two cases of \"invasive\" SUM. <i>Case Presentation</i>. We present two cases of invasive SUM without radiographic evidence of intraosseous involvement, where we avoided digit amputation for both invasive subungual squamous cell carcinoma of the thumb and invasive subungual melanoma of the ring finger. Both were salvaged by using a triple technique under awake local anesthesia which included (I) radical excision of the nail bed unit including both eponychium and periosteum, (II) dorsal cortical bone shaving using a high-speed burr for the distal phalanx, and (III) flap coverage. Brunelli flap was used for the thumb in the first case, and V-Y plasty combined with proximal nail fold advancement flap was used for the ring finger in the second case. There was no evidence of local or distant recurrence, with a good functional outcome after 2.5 years in the first case and 2 years in the second.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ensuring complete resection with negative margins while preserving the functionality of the affected digit is considered to be the optimal challenge in treating \"invasive\" subungual malignancies. These two case reports contribute by reporting a successful digit salvage. The safety of this procedure could be confirmed by larger series and longer follow-up periods.</p>","PeriodicalId":30287,"journal":{"name":"Case Reports in Orthopedics","volume":"2021 ","pages":"4648627"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8497149/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Reports in Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4648627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: Amputation for subungual malignancy (SUM) was thought to be the gold standard in preventing recurrence and metastasis. The rationale behind this aggressive treatment was never based on scientific evidence. Even though multiple recent studies supported more conservative management by illustrating successful results of the digit salvage technique, especially for "in situ" SUM, this salvage approach is not well supported for the more aggressive type of the "invasive" SUM; herein, we salvaged two cases of "invasive" SUM. Case Presentation. We present two cases of invasive SUM without radiographic evidence of intraosseous involvement, where we avoided digit amputation for both invasive subungual squamous cell carcinoma of the thumb and invasive subungual melanoma of the ring finger. Both were salvaged by using a triple technique under awake local anesthesia which included (I) radical excision of the nail bed unit including both eponychium and periosteum, (II) dorsal cortical bone shaving using a high-speed burr for the distal phalanx, and (III) flap coverage. Brunelli flap was used for the thumb in the first case, and V-Y plasty combined with proximal nail fold advancement flap was used for the ring finger in the second case. There was no evidence of local or distant recurrence, with a good functional outcome after 2.5 years in the first case and 2 years in the second.

Conclusion: Ensuring complete resection with negative margins while preserving the functionality of the affected digit is considered to be the optimal challenge in treating "invasive" subungual malignancies. These two case reports contribute by reporting a successful digit salvage. The safety of this procedure could be confirmed by larger series and longer follow-up periods.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

清醒局麻下三合一技术抢救侵入性甲下恶性肿瘤的手指。
趾下恶性肿瘤(SUM)截肢被认为是预防复发和转移的金标准。这种激进疗法背后的理论基础从来都没有科学依据。尽管最近的多项研究通过说明手指保留技术的成功结果支持更保守的管理,特别是对于“原位”SUM,但这种保留方法并不很好地支持更具侵略性的“侵入性”SUM;在此,我们抢救了两例“侵入性”SUM。案例演示。我们报告了两例侵袭性SUM,没有骨内受累的影像学证据,我们避免了拇指的侵袭性甲下鳞状细胞癌和无名指的侵袭性甲下黑色素瘤的手指截肢。两例患者均在清醒局部麻醉下采用三合一技术进行修复,包括(I)根治性切除甲床单元,包括掌骨和骨膜,(II)使用高速毛刺对远端指骨进行背侧皮质骨刮除,以及(III)皮瓣覆盖。1例拇指采用Brunelli皮瓣,2例无名指采用V-Y成形术联合近端甲襞推进皮瓣。没有局部或远处复发的证据,第一例2.5年和第二例2年后功能预后良好。结论:在保留患指功能的同时,确保负缘完全切除被认为是治疗“侵袭性”甲下恶性肿瘤的最佳挑战。这两个病例报告通过报告成功的手指抢救作出贡献。该方法的安全性可以通过更大的系列和更长的随访期来证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信