Reproducibility of manual segmentation in muscle imaging.

Q3 Medicine
Acta Myologica Pub Date : 2021-09-30 eCollection Date: 2021-09-01 DOI:10.36185/2532-1900-052
Shaun Ivan Muzic, Matteo Paoletti, Francesca Solazzo, Eugenio Belatti, Raimondo Vitale, Niels Bergsland, Stefano Bastianello, Anna Pichiecchio
{"title":"Reproducibility of manual segmentation in muscle imaging.","authors":"Shaun Ivan Muzic,&nbsp;Matteo Paoletti,&nbsp;Francesca Solazzo,&nbsp;Eugenio Belatti,&nbsp;Raimondo Vitale,&nbsp;Niels Bergsland,&nbsp;Stefano Bastianello,&nbsp;Anna Pichiecchio","doi":"10.36185/2532-1900-052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the reproducibility of a manual muscle MRI segmentation method that follows a specific set of recommendations developed in our center.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Nine healthy volunteers underwent a muscle MRI examination that included a TSE T2 sequence of the thighs. Muscle segmentation was performed by three operators: an expert operator (OP1) with 3 years of experience and two radiology residents (OP2 and 3) who were both given basic segmentation instructions, whereas only OP2 underwent additional supervised training from OP1. Intra- and inter-operator Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OP1 showed the highest average intra-operator DSC values (0.885), whereas OP2 had higher average DSC (0.856) compared to OP3 (0.818). The highest inter-operator agreement was observed between Operators 1 and 2 (0.814) and the lowest between OP2 and OP3 (0.702). Confidence interval (CI) analysis showed that the most experienced operator also had the least variability in drawing the ROIs, whereas OP2 showed both higher intra-operator reproducibility compared to OP3 and higher inter-operator agreement with OP1. The muscles that showed the least reproducibility were the <i>semimembranosus</i> and the short head of the <i>biceps femoris</i>.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Following specific recommendations such as these ones derived from our single-center experience leads to an overall high reproducibility of manual muscle segmentation and is helpful in improving both intra-operator and inter-operator reproducibility in less experienced operators.</p>","PeriodicalId":35953,"journal":{"name":"Acta Myologica","volume":"40 3","pages":"116-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c0/9b/am-2021-03-116.PMC8489167.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Myologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36185/2532-1900-052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the reproducibility of a manual muscle MRI segmentation method that follows a specific set of recommendations developed in our center.

Materials and methods: Nine healthy volunteers underwent a muscle MRI examination that included a TSE T2 sequence of the thighs. Muscle segmentation was performed by three operators: an expert operator (OP1) with 3 years of experience and two radiology residents (OP2 and 3) who were both given basic segmentation instructions, whereas only OP2 underwent additional supervised training from OP1. Intra- and inter-operator Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was calculated.

Results: OP1 showed the highest average intra-operator DSC values (0.885), whereas OP2 had higher average DSC (0.856) compared to OP3 (0.818). The highest inter-operator agreement was observed between Operators 1 and 2 (0.814) and the lowest between OP2 and OP3 (0.702). Confidence interval (CI) analysis showed that the most experienced operator also had the least variability in drawing the ROIs, whereas OP2 showed both higher intra-operator reproducibility compared to OP3 and higher inter-operator agreement with OP1. The muscles that showed the least reproducibility were the semimembranosus and the short head of the biceps femoris.

Discussion: Following specific recommendations such as these ones derived from our single-center experience leads to an overall high reproducibility of manual muscle segmentation and is helpful in improving both intra-operator and inter-operator reproducibility in less experienced operators.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肌肉成像中人工分割的再现性。
目的:评估手动肌肉MRI分割方法的可重复性,该方法遵循我们中心开发的一套特定建议。材料和方法:9名健康志愿者接受了肌肉MRI检查,包括大腿的TSE T2序列。肌肉分割由三名操作员进行:一名具有3年经验的专家操作员(OP1)和两名接受基本分割指导的放射科住院医师(OP2和3),而只有OP2接受了OP1的额外监督训练。计算算子内和算子间骰子相似系数(DSC)。结果:OP1的平均操作员内DSC值最高(0.885),而OP2的平均DSC值高于OP3(0.818),为0.856。运营商1和运营商2之间的一致性最高(0.814),OP2和OP3之间的一致性最低(0.702)。置信区间(CI)分析显示,最有经验的操作员在绘制roi时也具有最小的可变性,而OP2与OP3相比具有更高的操作员内部可重复性,并且与OP1相比具有更高的操作员间一致性。再现性最差的肌肉是半膜肌和股二头肌短头。讨论:以下具体建议,如这些来自我们的单中心经验,可导致手动肌肉分割的总体高再现性,并有助于提高经验不足的操作员内部和操作员之间的再现性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Myologica
Acta Myologica Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信