Evaluation of the core 5 social determinants of health screening tool.

Public Health Nursing (Boston, Mass.) Pub Date : 2022-03-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-10 DOI:10.1111/phn.12983
Nancie Bechtel, Alexandria Jones, Jennifer Kue, Jodi L Ford
{"title":"Evaluation of the core 5 social determinants of health screening tool.","authors":"Nancie Bechtel,&nbsp;Alexandria Jones,&nbsp;Jennifer Kue,&nbsp;Jodi L Ford","doi":"10.1111/phn.12983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the effects of a social determinants of health (SDH) screening tool and service referral on emergency department (ED) use among patients at a Federally Qualified Health Center primary care clinic.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Quasi-experimental.</p><p><strong>Sample: </strong>Three-hundred and eleven English-speaking patients 18 years and older.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>The Core 5 SDH screening tool consists of five yes/no items assessing food, housing, utilities, transportation, and safety needs. The number of ED visits 3 months before and after the intervention were collected from electronic health records.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The research team administered the Core 5 SDH screening tool and if desired, referred patients with an identified need for SDH services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 43% of patients reported a SDH need with food insecurity most prevalent (62.2%). The number of ED visits was significantly lower 3 months post-intervention compared to 3 months before for the 125 participants who wanted and received the SDH service referral (IRR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.41, 0.99) and for the 35 participants who reported receiving some/all of the needed services at the 2-week follow-up (IRR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.17, 0.76).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Addressing patients' SDH needs may reduce ED visits, lower healthcare costs, and ultimately, improve health.</p>","PeriodicalId":233433,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nursing (Boston, Mass.)","volume":" ","pages":"438-445"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nursing (Boston, Mass.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the effects of a social determinants of health (SDH) screening tool and service referral on emergency department (ED) use among patients at a Federally Qualified Health Center primary care clinic.

Study design: Quasi-experimental.

Sample: Three-hundred and eleven English-speaking patients 18 years and older.

Measures: The Core 5 SDH screening tool consists of five yes/no items assessing food, housing, utilities, transportation, and safety needs. The number of ED visits 3 months before and after the intervention were collected from electronic health records.

Intervention: The research team administered the Core 5 SDH screening tool and if desired, referred patients with an identified need for SDH services.

Results: Approximately 43% of patients reported a SDH need with food insecurity most prevalent (62.2%). The number of ED visits was significantly lower 3 months post-intervention compared to 3 months before for the 125 participants who wanted and received the SDH service referral (IRR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.41, 0.99) and for the 35 participants who reported receiving some/all of the needed services at the 2-week follow-up (IRR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.17, 0.76).

Conclusions: Addressing patients' SDH needs may reduce ED visits, lower healthcare costs, and ultimately, improve health.

评价健康筛查工具的核心5个社会决定因素。
目的:本研究评估了健康社会决定因素(SDH)筛查工具和服务转诊对联邦合格卫生中心初级保健诊所患者急诊科(ED)使用的影响。研究设计:准实验。样本:311名18岁及以上说英语的患者。措施:Core 5 SDH筛选工具由5个是/否项目组成,评估食品、住房、公用事业、交通和安全需求。从电子健康记录中收集干预前后3个月的急诊科就诊次数。干预:研究小组使用Core 5 SDH筛查工具,如果需要,转诊需要SDH服务的患者。结果:大约43%的患者报告了SDH需求,其中食品不安全最为普遍(62.2%)。干预后3个月,与3个月前相比,125名希望并接受SDH服务推荐的参与者(IRR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.41, 0.99)和35名在2周随访中报告接受部分/全部所需服务的参与者(IRR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.17, 0.76)的ED就诊次数显着降低。结论:满足患者的SDH需求可以减少急诊科就诊,降低医疗成本,并最终改善健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信