Barriers and opportunities for refugee mental health services: clinician recommendations from Jordan.

Global mental health (Cambridge, England) Pub Date : 2021-09-28 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1017/gmh.2021.36
Majd Al-Soleiti, Mahmoud Abu Adi, Ayat Nashwan, Eric Rafla-Yuan
{"title":"Barriers and opportunities for refugee mental health services: clinician recommendations from Jordan.","authors":"Majd Al-Soleiti,&nbsp;Mahmoud Abu Adi,&nbsp;Ayat Nashwan,&nbsp;Eric Rafla-Yuan","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2021.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Jordan has received more than three million refugees from bordering countries during times of conflict, including over 600 000 Syrian refugees between 2011 and 2021. Amidst this humanitarian crisis, a new mental health system for Syrian refugees has developed in Jordan, with most clinical services administered through non-governmental organizations. Prior studies have identified increased risk of psychiatric disorders in refugee populations and significant barriers for Syrian refugees seeking mental health treatment, but few have reviewed the organization or ability of local systems to meet the needs of this refugee population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative interviews of mental health professionals working with refugees in Jordan were conducted and thematically analyzed to assess efficacy and organizational dynamics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interviewees described barriers to care inherent in many refugee settings, including financial limitations, shortages of mental health professionals, disparate geographic accessibility, stigma, and limited or absent screening protocols. Additional barriers not previously described in Jordan were identified, including clinician burnout, organizational metrics restricting services, insufficient visibility of services, and security restrictions. Advantages of the Jordanian system were also identified, including a receptive sociopolitical response fostering coordination and collaboration, open-door policies for accessing care, the presence of community and grassroots approaches, and improvements to health care infrastructure benefiting the local populace.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight opportunities and pitfalls for program development in Jordan and other middle- and low-income countries. Leveraging clinician input can promote health system efficacy and improve mental health outcomes for refugee patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":520633,"journal":{"name":"Global mental health (Cambridge, England)","volume":" ","pages":"e38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/96/9b/S2054425121000364a.PMC8482442.pdf","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global mental health (Cambridge, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2021.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: Jordan has received more than three million refugees from bordering countries during times of conflict, including over 600 000 Syrian refugees between 2011 and 2021. Amidst this humanitarian crisis, a new mental health system for Syrian refugees has developed in Jordan, with most clinical services administered through non-governmental organizations. Prior studies have identified increased risk of psychiatric disorders in refugee populations and significant barriers for Syrian refugees seeking mental health treatment, but few have reviewed the organization or ability of local systems to meet the needs of this refugee population.

Methods: Qualitative interviews of mental health professionals working with refugees in Jordan were conducted and thematically analyzed to assess efficacy and organizational dynamics.

Results: Interviewees described barriers to care inherent in many refugee settings, including financial limitations, shortages of mental health professionals, disparate geographic accessibility, stigma, and limited or absent screening protocols. Additional barriers not previously described in Jordan were identified, including clinician burnout, organizational metrics restricting services, insufficient visibility of services, and security restrictions. Advantages of the Jordanian system were also identified, including a receptive sociopolitical response fostering coordination and collaboration, open-door policies for accessing care, the presence of community and grassroots approaches, and improvements to health care infrastructure benefiting the local populace.

Conclusions: These findings highlight opportunities and pitfalls for program development in Jordan and other middle- and low-income countries. Leveraging clinician input can promote health system efficacy and improve mental health outcomes for refugee patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

难民心理健康服务的障碍和机会:来自约旦的临床医生建议。
背景:约旦在冲突期间接收了来自邻国的300多万难民,其中包括2011年至2021年期间60多万叙利亚难民。在这场人道主义危机中,约旦为叙利亚难民建立了一个新的精神卫生系统,其中大多数临床服务由非政府组织管理。先前的研究已经确定难民人口中精神疾病的风险增加,以及叙利亚难民寻求精神健康治疗的重大障碍,但很少有人审查当地系统的组织或能力,以满足这些难民人口的需求。方法:对在约旦从事难民工作的心理健康专业人员进行定性访谈,并对其进行主题分析,以评估有效性和组织动态。结果:受访者描述了许多难民环境中固有的护理障碍,包括财政限制、精神卫生专业人员短缺、地理可及性不同、耻辱以及有限或缺乏筛查方案。还发现了约旦以前未描述的其他障碍,包括临床医生职业倦怠、限制服务的组织指标、服务可视性不足以及安全限制。还确定了约旦制度的优势,包括促进协调与合作的接受性社会政治反应,获得保健的开放政策,社区和基层方法的存在,以及使当地民众受益的保健基础设施的改善。结论:这些发现突出了约旦和其他中低收入国家规划发展的机遇和陷阱。利用临床医生的投入可以提高卫生系统的效率,改善难民患者的心理健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信