Patient-Focused Websites Related to Postpartum Pelvic Floor Health: A DISCERN Quality Analysis.

Deepali Maheshwari, Christina Kunycky, Xibei Jia, Abhilasha Tangada, Katherine Leung, Ellen R Solomon
{"title":"Patient-Focused Websites Related to Postpartum Pelvic Floor Health: A DISCERN Quality Analysis.","authors":"Deepali Maheshwari,&nbsp;Christina Kunycky,&nbsp;Xibei Jia,&nbsp;Abhilasha Tangada,&nbsp;Katherine Leung,&nbsp;Ellen R Solomon","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate the quality of patient-focused websites addressing postpartum pelvic floor health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Google search engine was used to perform a search of the following 3 terms: (1) \"postpartum pelvic floor (PPF),\" (2) \"postpartum leaking urine (PLU),\" and (3) \"postpartum leaking stool (PLS).\" The top 20 results from each search term were evaluated using the DISCERN quality appraisal tool and Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria by 2 independent researchers. Websites were also categorized by type. Cohen κ was performed to determine interrater reliability between reviewers. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to evaluate the differences in DISCERN and JAMA criteria scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The weighted mean κ between the investigators for each search term was κ = 0.47 (range = 0.163 [PPF] to 0.759 [PLU]), suggesting moderate agreement between reviewers. There was a significant difference in mean DISCERN scores between the terms, with \"postpartum leaking urine\" yielding the highest mean score. When comparing DISCERN scores by category, society- and government-sponsored websites (mean = 55 ± 13) scored significantly higher than other categories. Using JAMA criteria, mean scores ranged between 1.83 and 2.83/4, but there were no significant differences between websites.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The overall quality of health information available on the internet regarding postpartum pelvic health is low. Higher-quality search results are found within society- and government-sponsored websites as well as under the search term \"postpartum leaking urine.\" It is important for health care providers to guide their patients to websites with reliable information about postpartum pelvic floor recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":520625,"journal":{"name":"Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"240-243"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the quality of patient-focused websites addressing postpartum pelvic floor health.

Methods: The Google search engine was used to perform a search of the following 3 terms: (1) "postpartum pelvic floor (PPF)," (2) "postpartum leaking urine (PLU)," and (3) "postpartum leaking stool (PLS)." The top 20 results from each search term were evaluated using the DISCERN quality appraisal tool and Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria by 2 independent researchers. Websites were also categorized by type. Cohen κ was performed to determine interrater reliability between reviewers. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to evaluate the differences in DISCERN and JAMA criteria scores.

Results: The weighted mean κ between the investigators for each search term was κ = 0.47 (range = 0.163 [PPF] to 0.759 [PLU]), suggesting moderate agreement between reviewers. There was a significant difference in mean DISCERN scores between the terms, with "postpartum leaking urine" yielding the highest mean score. When comparing DISCERN scores by category, society- and government-sponsored websites (mean = 55 ± 13) scored significantly higher than other categories. Using JAMA criteria, mean scores ranged between 1.83 and 2.83/4, but there were no significant differences between websites.

Conclusions: The overall quality of health information available on the internet regarding postpartum pelvic health is low. Higher-quality search results are found within society- and government-sponsored websites as well as under the search term "postpartum leaking urine." It is important for health care providers to guide their patients to websites with reliable information about postpartum pelvic floor recovery.

以患者为中心的产后盆底健康相关网站:一项质量分析。
目的:本研究的目的是评估以患者为中心的产后盆底健康网站的质量。方法:使用谷歌搜索引擎对以下3个术语进行搜索:(1)“产后盆底(PPF)”(2)“产后漏尿(PLU)”和(3)“产后漏便(PLS)。”每个搜索词的前20个结果由2名独立研究人员使用DISCERN质量评估工具和美国医学会杂志(JAMA)基准标准进行评估。网站也按类型分类。采用Cohen κ来确定审稿人间的信度。Kruskal-Wallis测试用于评估DISCERN和JAMA标准评分的差异。结果:研究者对每个搜索词的加权平均κ值为κ = 0.47(范围为0.163 [PPF]至0.759 [PLU]),表明审稿人之间的一致性中等。两个术语之间的平均辨别得分有显著差异,“产后漏尿”的平均得分最高。当按类别比较DISCERN得分时,社会和政府资助的网站(平均值= 55±13)得分明显高于其他类别。使用JAMA标准,平均得分在1.83到2.83/4之间,但网站之间没有显著差异。结论:网上有关产后盆腔健康的信息总体质量较低。高质量的搜索结果可以在社会和政府赞助的网站上找到,也可以在“产后尿漏”这个搜索词下找到。重要的是卫生保健提供者引导他们的病人到网站提供可靠的信息产后盆底恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信