Use of clinical data to augment healthcare worker contact tracing during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Peter Hong, Joshua C Herigon, Colby Uptegraft, Bassem Samuel, D Levin Brown, Jonathan Bickel, Jonathan D Hron
{"title":"Use of clinical data to augment healthcare worker contact tracing during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Peter Hong,&nbsp;Joshua C Herigon,&nbsp;Colby Uptegraft,&nbsp;Bassem Samuel,&nbsp;D Levin Brown,&nbsp;Jonathan Bickel,&nbsp;Jonathan D Hron","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocab231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This work examined the secondary use of clinical data from the electronic health record (EHR) for screening our healthcare worker (HCW) population for potential exposures to patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study at a free-standing, quaternary care pediatric hospital comparing first-degree, patient-HCW pairs identified by the hospital's COVID-19 contact tracing team (CTT) to those identified using EHR clinical event data (EHR Report). The primary outcome was the number of patient-HCW pairs detected by each process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 233 patients with COVID-19, our EHR Report identified 4116 patient-HCW pairs, including 2365 (30.0%) of the 7890 pairs detected by the CTT. The EHR Report also revealed 1751 pairs not identified by the CTT. The highest number of patient-HCW pairs per patient was detected in the inpatient care venue. Nurses comprised the most frequently identified HCW role overall.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Automated methods to screen HCWs for potential exposures to patients with COVID-19 using clinical event data from the EHR (1) are likely to improve epidemiological surveillance by contact tracing programs and (2) represent a viable and readily available strategy that should be considered by other institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":236137,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA","volume":" ","pages":"142-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8714290/pdf/ocab231.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocab231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objective: This work examined the secondary use of clinical data from the electronic health record (EHR) for screening our healthcare worker (HCW) population for potential exposures to patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Materials and methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study at a free-standing, quaternary care pediatric hospital comparing first-degree, patient-HCW pairs identified by the hospital's COVID-19 contact tracing team (CTT) to those identified using EHR clinical event data (EHR Report). The primary outcome was the number of patient-HCW pairs detected by each process.

Results: Among 233 patients with COVID-19, our EHR Report identified 4116 patient-HCW pairs, including 2365 (30.0%) of the 7890 pairs detected by the CTT. The EHR Report also revealed 1751 pairs not identified by the CTT. The highest number of patient-HCW pairs per patient was detected in the inpatient care venue. Nurses comprised the most frequently identified HCW role overall.

Conclusions: Automated methods to screen HCWs for potential exposures to patients with COVID-19 using clinical event data from the EHR (1) are likely to improve epidemiological surveillance by contact tracing programs and (2) represent a viable and readily available strategy that should be considered by other institutions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在COVID-19大流行期间使用临床数据加强卫生保健工作者接触者追踪。
目的:本工作研究了电子健康记录(EHR)临床数据在筛查我国卫生保健工作者(HCW)人群中潜在暴露于2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者的二次使用。材料和方法:我们在一家独立的四级护理儿科医院进行了一项横断面研究,比较了由该医院的COVID-19接触者追踪小组(CTT)识别的一级患者- hcw对与通过EHR临床事件数据(EHR报告)识别的患者- hcw对。主要结果是每个过程检测到的患者- hcw对的数量。结果:在233例COVID-19患者中,我们的EHR报告发现了4116对患者- hcw,其中CTT检测到的7890对中有2365对(30.0%)。EHR报告还揭示了1751对未被CTT识别的配对。在住院护理场所,每名患者的患者- hcw配对数量最高。总体而言,护士是最常见的HCW角色。结论:利用电子病历中的临床事件数据对卫生保健工作者筛查COVID-19患者潜在暴露的自动化方法(1)可能通过接触者追踪计划改善流行病学监测,(2)是一种可行且现成的策略,其他机构应予以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信