[Complete response after neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer: implications for surgery].

4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Chirurg Pub Date : 2022-02-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-07 DOI:10.1007/s00104-021-01516-4
Giovanni Capovilla, Caterina Froiio, Hauke Lang, Felix Berlth, Peter Philipp Grimminger
{"title":"[Complete response after neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer: implications for surgery].","authors":"Giovanni Capovilla,&nbsp;Caterina Froiio,&nbsp;Hauke Lang,&nbsp;Felix Berlth,&nbsp;Peter Philipp Grimminger","doi":"10.1007/s00104-021-01516-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perioperative or neoadjuvant therapy is the mainstay of treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer in Europe; however, data regarding possible modifications in the surgical strategy depending on the response to preoperative treatment are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review was carried out based on a search of the relevant contemporary literature regarding neoadjuvant or perioperative treatment for gastric adenocarcinoma and the implications of tumor response for the subsequent surgical treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most recent randomized trials showed a survival benefit after perioperative or neoadjuvant treatment for gastric cancer. Due to the variable response to the preoperatively administered part of the therapy, including complete response, it appears reasonable to develop an individualized surgical approach; however, scientific results supporting this approach are limited due to the variable quality of the surgical resection provided in these studies and the limited rate of complete response to preoperative treatment. Moreover, the reliability of clinical restaging after preoperative treatment is also limited. On the other hand, there is currently evidence that supports a re-evaluation of the necessary resection margins for partial gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer with the help of intraoperative frozen sections and new reconstruction methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current evidence does not support the implementation of a complete organ-sparing strategy with active follow-up surveillance for gastric cancer.; however, stomach-preserving partial gastrectomy techniques could be applied for advanced disease more often in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":50700,"journal":{"name":"Chirurg","volume":"93 2","pages":"138-143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurg","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-021-01516-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Perioperative or neoadjuvant therapy is the mainstay of treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer in Europe; however, data regarding possible modifications in the surgical strategy depending on the response to preoperative treatment are lacking.

Methods: This review was carried out based on a search of the relevant contemporary literature regarding neoadjuvant or perioperative treatment for gastric adenocarcinoma and the implications of tumor response for the subsequent surgical treatment.

Results: The most recent randomized trials showed a survival benefit after perioperative or neoadjuvant treatment for gastric cancer. Due to the variable response to the preoperatively administered part of the therapy, including complete response, it appears reasonable to develop an individualized surgical approach; however, scientific results supporting this approach are limited due to the variable quality of the surgical resection provided in these studies and the limited rate of complete response to preoperative treatment. Moreover, the reliability of clinical restaging after preoperative treatment is also limited. On the other hand, there is currently evidence that supports a re-evaluation of the necessary resection margins for partial gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer with the help of intraoperative frozen sections and new reconstruction methods.

Conclusion: The current evidence does not support the implementation of a complete organ-sparing strategy with active follow-up surveillance for gastric cancer.; however, stomach-preserving partial gastrectomy techniques could be applied for advanced disease more often in the future.

[胃癌新辅助治疗后的完全缓解:对手术的影响]。
背景:在欧洲,围手术期或新辅助治疗是局部晚期胃癌的主要治疗方法;然而,根据术前治疗的反应,关于手术策略可能改变的数据缺乏。方法:检索当代胃腺癌新辅助或围手术期治疗的相关文献,探讨肿瘤反应对后续手术治疗的影响。结果:最近的随机试验显示胃癌围手术期或新辅助治疗后的生存获益。由于术前给予部分治疗的不同反应,包括完全反应,因此开发个体化手术方法似乎是合理的;然而,由于这些研究中提供的手术切除质量不一,以及术前治疗的完全缓解率有限,支持这种方法的科学结果有限。此外,术前治疗后临床再诊断的可靠性也有限。另一方面,目前有证据支持在术中冷冻切片和新的重建方法的帮助下,重新评估晚期胃癌部分胃切除术所需的切除边缘。结论:目前的证据不支持对胃癌实施完整的器官保留策略和积极的随访监测。然而,保留胃的部分胃切除术技术在未来可以更频繁地应用于晚期疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chirurg
Chirurg 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur Alle Gebiete der Operativen Medizen The magazine is intended for surgeons in hospitals, clinics and research. Each issue includes a comprehensive theme: Practical summaries access to selected topics and provide the reader with a compilation of current knowledge in all fields of surgery. Besides imparting relevant background knowledge, the emphasis is on the review of scientific results and practical experience. The reader will find concrete recommendations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信