Use of GammaPlan convolution algorithm for dose calculation on CT and cone-beam CT images.

IF 1.8 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Radiation Oncology Journal Pub Date : 2021-06-01 Epub Date: 2021-06-16 DOI:10.3857/roj.2020.00640
Prabhakar Ramachandran, Ben Perrett, Orrie Dancewicz, Venkatakrishnan Seshadri, Catherine Jones, Akash Mehta, Matthew Foote
{"title":"Use of GammaPlan convolution algorithm for dose calculation on CT and cone-beam CT images.","authors":"Prabhakar Ramachandran,&nbsp;Ben Perrett,&nbsp;Orrie Dancewicz,&nbsp;Venkatakrishnan Seshadri,&nbsp;Catherine Jones,&nbsp;Akash Mehta,&nbsp;Matthew Foote","doi":"10.3857/roj.2020.00640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the suitability of using cone-beam computed tomography images (CBCTs) produced in a Leksell Gamma Knife (LGK) Icon system to generate electron density information for the convolution algorithm in Leksell GammaPlan (LGP) Treatment Planning System (TPS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective set of 30 LGK treatment plans generated for patients with multiple metastases was selected in this study. Both CBCTs and fan-beam CTs were used to provide electron density data for the convolution algorithm. Plan quality metrics such as coverage, selectivity, gradient index, and beam-on time were used to assess the changes introduced by convolution using CBCT (convCBCT) and planning CT (convCT) data compared to the homogeneous TMR10 algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean beam-on time for TMR10 and convCBCT was found to be 18.9 ± 5.8 minutes and 21.7 ± 6.6 minutes, respectively. The absolute mean difference between TMR10 and convCBCT for coverage, selectivity, and gradient index were 0.001, 0.02, and 0.0002, respectively. The calculated beam-on times for convCBCT were higher than the time calculated for convCT treatment plans. This is attributed to the considerable variation in Hounsfield values (HU) dependent on the position within the field of view.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The artifacts from the CBCT's limited field-of-view and considerable HU variation need to be taken into account before considering the use of convolution algorithm for dose calculation on CBCT image datasets, and electron data derived from the onboard CBCT should be used with caution.</p>","PeriodicalId":46572,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4d/b7/roj-2020-00640.PMC8497862.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Oncology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2020.00640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the suitability of using cone-beam computed tomography images (CBCTs) produced in a Leksell Gamma Knife (LGK) Icon system to generate electron density information for the convolution algorithm in Leksell GammaPlan (LGP) Treatment Planning System (TPS).

Materials and methods: A retrospective set of 30 LGK treatment plans generated for patients with multiple metastases was selected in this study. Both CBCTs and fan-beam CTs were used to provide electron density data for the convolution algorithm. Plan quality metrics such as coverage, selectivity, gradient index, and beam-on time were used to assess the changes introduced by convolution using CBCT (convCBCT) and planning CT (convCT) data compared to the homogeneous TMR10 algorithm.

Results: The mean beam-on time for TMR10 and convCBCT was found to be 18.9 ± 5.8 minutes and 21.7 ± 6.6 minutes, respectively. The absolute mean difference between TMR10 and convCBCT for coverage, selectivity, and gradient index were 0.001, 0.02, and 0.0002, respectively. The calculated beam-on times for convCBCT were higher than the time calculated for convCT treatment plans. This is attributed to the considerable variation in Hounsfield values (HU) dependent on the position within the field of view.

Conclusion: The artifacts from the CBCT's limited field-of-view and considerable HU variation need to be taken into account before considering the use of convolution algorithm for dose calculation on CBCT image datasets, and electron data derived from the onboard CBCT should be used with caution.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用GammaPlan卷积算法对CT和锥束CT图像进行剂量计算。
目的:本研究的目的是评估使用Leksell伽玛刀(LGK) Icon系统产生的锥束计算机断层扫描图像(cbct)为Leksell伽玛刀(LGP)治疗计划系统(TPS)中的卷积算法生成电子密度信息的适用性。材料和方法:本研究回顾性分析了30例多发转移患者的LGK治疗方案。cbct和扇束ct都被用来为卷积算法提供电子密度数据。与同质TMR10算法相比,使用CBCT (convCBCT)和计划CT (convCT)数据评估卷积带来的变化,计划质量指标如覆盖率、选择性、梯度指数和波束到达时间。结果:TMR10和convCBCT的平均照射时间分别为18.9±5.8分钟和21.7±6.6分钟。TMR10与convCBCT在覆盖率、选择性和梯度指数上的绝对平均差值分别为0.001、0.02和0.0002。计算出的对流cbct的光束照射时间高于对流ct治疗方案的计算时间。这是由于亨斯菲尔德值(HU)的相当大的变化取决于视野内的位置。结论:在考虑使用卷积算法对CBCT图像数据集进行剂量计算之前,需要考虑CBCT有限视场的伪影和相当大的HU变化,并且应谨慎使用机载CBCT获得的电子数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信