Experimentation or projectification of urban change? A critical appraisal and three steps forward.

Urban transformations Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-29 DOI:10.1186/s42854-021-00025-1
Jonas Torrens, Timo von Wirth
{"title":"Experimentation or projectification of urban change? A critical appraisal and three steps forward.","authors":"Jonas Torrens,&nbsp;Timo von Wirth","doi":"10.1186/s42854-021-00025-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Urban experimentation has proliferated in recent years as a response to sustainability challenges and renewed pressures on urban governance. In many European cities, diverse and rapidly changing experimental forms (e.g. urban living laboratories, pilots, trials, experimental districts) are becoming commonplace, addressing ambitious goals for smartness, circularity, and liveability. Academically, there is a growing concern for moving beyond the focus on individual experiments and the insistence on upscaling their primary transformation mechanism. However, the phenomena of 'projectification' - whereby project-based forms of organising have become ubiquitous, shaping expectations about experimentation - is increasingly perceived as a barrier. Nevertheless, how specifically experimentation and projectification intersect remains unclear. Our theoretical perspective examines how the widespread tendency towards projectification shapes urban experimentation and the potential implications for urban transformations. It problematises the current wave of experimentation and how it contributes to the <i>projectification of urban change processes</i>. We present three steps to redress this issue and indicate directions for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":75286,"journal":{"name":"Urban transformations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8479717/pdf/","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban transformations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-021-00025-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

Urban experimentation has proliferated in recent years as a response to sustainability challenges and renewed pressures on urban governance. In many European cities, diverse and rapidly changing experimental forms (e.g. urban living laboratories, pilots, trials, experimental districts) are becoming commonplace, addressing ambitious goals for smartness, circularity, and liveability. Academically, there is a growing concern for moving beyond the focus on individual experiments and the insistence on upscaling their primary transformation mechanism. However, the phenomena of 'projectification' - whereby project-based forms of organising have become ubiquitous, shaping expectations about experimentation - is increasingly perceived as a barrier. Nevertheless, how specifically experimentation and projectification intersect remains unclear. Our theoretical perspective examines how the widespread tendency towards projectification shapes urban experimentation and the potential implications for urban transformations. It problematises the current wave of experimentation and how it contributes to the projectification of urban change processes. We present three steps to redress this issue and indicate directions for future research.

Abstract Image

城市变化的实验或规划?一个批判性的评估和三步前进。
近年来,作为对可持续性挑战和城市治理新压力的回应,城市实验激增。在许多欧洲城市,多样化和快速变化的实验形式(如城市生活实验室、试点、试验、实验区)正变得司空见惯,以实现智能、循环和宜居的宏伟目标。在学术上,越来越多的人关注超越对个体实验的关注,并坚持升级他们的主要转化机制。然而,“项目化”现象——基于项目的组织形式已经变得无处不在,塑造了对实验的期望——越来越被视为一种障碍。然而,实验和投影如何具体地相交仍然不清楚。我们的理论视角考察了投影化的普遍趋势如何塑造城市实验以及对城市转型的潜在影响。它提出了当前实验浪潮的问题,以及它如何有助于城市变化过程的预测。我们提出了纠正这一问题的三个步骤,并指出了未来研究的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信