Interprofessional teamwork for managing medical deterioration in pregnancy: what contributes to good clinical performance in simulated practice?

IF 1.1 Q2 Social Sciences
Mary Lavelle, Gabriel B Reedy, Thomas Simpson, Anita Banerjee, Janet E Anderson
{"title":"Interprofessional teamwork for managing medical deterioration in pregnancy: what contributes to good clinical performance in simulated practice?","authors":"Mary Lavelle, Gabriel B Reedy, Thomas Simpson, Anita Banerjee, Janet E Anderson","doi":"10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify the patterns of teamwork displayed by interprofessional teams during simulated management of medical deterioration in pregnancy and examine whether and how they are related to clinical performance in simulated practice.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Exploratory observational cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Interprofessional clinical simulation training with scenarios involving the management of medical deterioration in pregnant women.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Seventeen simulated scenarios involving 62 qualified healthcare staff working within the National Health Service attending clinical simulation training (midwives (n=18), obstetricians (n=24) and medical physicians (n=20)).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Teamwork behaviours over time, obtained through detailed observational analysis of recorded scenarios, using the Temporal Observational Analysis of Teamwork (TOAsT) framework. Clinician rated measures of simulated clinical performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Scenarios with better simulated clinical performance were characterised by shared leadership between obstetricians and midwives at the start of the scenario, with obstetricians delegating less and midwives disseminating rationale, while both engaged in more information gathering behaviour. Towards the end of the scenario, better simulated clinical performance was associated with dissemination of rationale to the team. More delegation at the start of a scenario was associated with less spontaneous sharing of information and rationale later in the scenario. Teams that shared their thinking at the start of a scenario continued to do so over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Teamwork during the opening moments of a clinical situation is critical for simulated clinical performance in the interprofessional management of medical deterioration in pregnancy. Shared leadership and the early development of the shared mental model are associated with better outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":44757,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":" ","pages":"463-470"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ad/1d/bmjstel-2020-000700.PMC8445203.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the patterns of teamwork displayed by interprofessional teams during simulated management of medical deterioration in pregnancy and examine whether and how they are related to clinical performance in simulated practice.

Design: Exploratory observational cohort study.

Setting: Interprofessional clinical simulation training with scenarios involving the management of medical deterioration in pregnant women.

Participants: Seventeen simulated scenarios involving 62 qualified healthcare staff working within the National Health Service attending clinical simulation training (midwives (n=18), obstetricians (n=24) and medical physicians (n=20)).

Main outcome measures: Teamwork behaviours over time, obtained through detailed observational analysis of recorded scenarios, using the Temporal Observational Analysis of Teamwork (TOAsT) framework. Clinician rated measures of simulated clinical performance.

Results: Scenarios with better simulated clinical performance were characterised by shared leadership between obstetricians and midwives at the start of the scenario, with obstetricians delegating less and midwives disseminating rationale, while both engaged in more information gathering behaviour. Towards the end of the scenario, better simulated clinical performance was associated with dissemination of rationale to the team. More delegation at the start of a scenario was associated with less spontaneous sharing of information and rationale later in the scenario. Teams that shared their thinking at the start of a scenario continued to do so over time.

Conclusions: Teamwork during the opening moments of a clinical situation is critical for simulated clinical performance in the interprofessional management of medical deterioration in pregnancy. Shared leadership and the early development of the shared mental model are associated with better outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

跨专业团队合作处理妊娠期病情恶化:模拟实践中良好的临床表现源于什么?
目的确定跨专业团队在模拟处理妊娠期医疗恶化过程中表现出的团队合作模式,并研究这些模式是否以及如何与模拟实践中的临床表现相关:设计:探索性观察队列研究:环境:跨专业临床模拟培训,模拟情景涉及孕妇病情恶化的处理:17个模拟场景,涉及62名参加临床模拟培训的国家卫生服务部门合格医护人员(助产士(18人)、产科医生(24人)和内科医生(20人)):团队合作行为随时间的变化,采用团队合作时间观察分析(TOAsT)框架,通过对记录的情景进行详细的观察分析获得。临床医生对模拟临床表现进行评分:结果:模拟临床表现较好的情景在情景开始时由产科医生和助产士共同领导,产科医生较少授权,而助产士则传播原理,同时双方都有较多的信息收集行为。在情景模拟接近尾声时,更好的模拟临床表现与向团队传播基本原理有关。情景模拟开始时更多的授权与情景模拟后期较少自发分享信息和原理有关。在情景模拟开始时交流思想的团队随着时间的推移会继续这样做:结论:临床情景开始时的团队合作对于模拟妊娠期内科病情恶化跨专业管理的临床表现至关重要。共同领导和共同心理模型的早期发展与更好的结果相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信