The involvement of axillary reverse mapping nodes in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer.

IF 2.9
Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) Pub Date : 2022-03-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-30 DOI:10.1007/s12282-021-01300-6
M Noguchi, M Inokuchi, M Yokoi-Noguchi, E Morioka
{"title":"The involvement of axillary reverse mapping nodes in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer.","authors":"M Noguchi,&nbsp;M Inokuchi,&nbsp;M Yokoi-Noguchi,&nbsp;E Morioka","doi":"10.1007/s12282-021-01300-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Axillary reverse mapping (ARM) was developed to preserve the lymphatic drainage from the upper arm during sentinel lymph-node (SLN) biopsy or axillary lymph-node dissection (ALND). However, the oncological safety of ARM has been controversial because of not infrequent involvement of ARM nodes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with clinically negative nodes (cN0) underwent SLN biopsy and ARM. SLNs were identified using blue dye and radioisotope, and ARM nodes were traced using the fluorescent method. Patients with positive SLN underwent the standard ALND. After surgery, they were followed up for more than 3 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 507 patients with cN0 breast cancer were enrolled between May 2009 and November 2017. SLNs were identified in 499 (98%) of 507 patients, and ARM nodes were identified in 159 (31%) patients in the SLN field. The crossover rate of SLN-ARM nodes was 28%. Among 95 patients with positive SLNs, 70 patients underwent conventional ALND. ARM nodes were identified in 65 (93%) of those patients in the ALND field. The mean number of removed ARM nodes was 7.2 (range 0-25) in patients who underwent the standard ALND. Although ARM nodes were involved in 18 of 65 patients, the involved ARM nodes were the same SLNs identified in 14 (78%) patients. Since SLN-ARM nodes should be removed, ARM nodes were involved only in 4 (5.7%) patients after SLN biopsy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Except for positive SLN-ARM nodes, the involvement of ARM nodes is infrequent in patients with positive SLN.</p>","PeriodicalId":520574,"journal":{"name":"Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)","volume":" ","pages":"209-215"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-021-01300-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Axillary reverse mapping (ARM) was developed to preserve the lymphatic drainage from the upper arm during sentinel lymph-node (SLN) biopsy or axillary lymph-node dissection (ALND). However, the oncological safety of ARM has been controversial because of not infrequent involvement of ARM nodes.

Methods: Patients with clinically negative nodes (cN0) underwent SLN biopsy and ARM. SLNs were identified using blue dye and radioisotope, and ARM nodes were traced using the fluorescent method. Patients with positive SLN underwent the standard ALND. After surgery, they were followed up for more than 3 years.

Results: A total of 507 patients with cN0 breast cancer were enrolled between May 2009 and November 2017. SLNs were identified in 499 (98%) of 507 patients, and ARM nodes were identified in 159 (31%) patients in the SLN field. The crossover rate of SLN-ARM nodes was 28%. Among 95 patients with positive SLNs, 70 patients underwent conventional ALND. ARM nodes were identified in 65 (93%) of those patients in the ALND field. The mean number of removed ARM nodes was 7.2 (range 0-25) in patients who underwent the standard ALND. Although ARM nodes were involved in 18 of 65 patients, the involved ARM nodes were the same SLNs identified in 14 (78%) patients. Since SLN-ARM nodes should be removed, ARM nodes were involved only in 4 (5.7%) patients after SLN biopsy.

Conclusions: Except for positive SLN-ARM nodes, the involvement of ARM nodes is infrequent in patients with positive SLN.

临床淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者腋窝反向映射淋巴结的累及。
背景:腋窝反向定位(ARM)是为了在前哨淋巴结(SLN)活检或腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)期间保存上臂淋巴引流而开发的。然而,由于ARM淋巴结的累及并不罕见,ARM的肿瘤安全性一直存在争议。方法:临床阴性淋巴结(cN0)患者行SLN活检和ARM。用蓝色染料和放射性同位素鉴定sln,用荧光法追踪ARM节点。SLN阳性患者行标准ALND。术后随访3年以上。结果:2009年5月至2017年11月,共有507例cN0乳腺癌患者入组。507例患者中有499例(98%)发现了SLN, 159例(31%)患者在SLN领域发现了ARM淋巴结。SLN-ARM节点交叉率为28%。在95例sln阳性患者中,70例接受了常规ALND。在ALND患者中,65例(93%)发现了ARM淋巴结。在接受标准ALND的患者中,平均切除的ARM节点数为7.2(范围0-25)。虽然65例患者中有18例受累ARM淋巴结,但14例(78%)患者受累的ARM淋巴结与sln相同。由于SLN-ARM淋巴结应被切除,SLN活检后仅4例(5.7%)患者累及ARM淋巴结。结论:除SLN-ARM阳性淋巴结外,SLN阳性患者很少累及ARM淋巴结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信