Implication of the Strand-Specific Imprinting and Segregation Model: Integrating in utero Hormone Exposure, Stem Cell and Lateral Asymmetry Hypotheses in Breast Cancer Aetiology.

Hereditary genetics : current research Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-08-13 DOI:10.4172/2161-1041.s2-005
Singh Harbinder, Carol A Lazzara, Amar Js Klar
{"title":"Implication of the Strand-Specific Imprinting and Segregation Model: Integrating <i>in utero</i> Hormone Exposure, Stem Cell and Lateral Asymmetry Hypotheses in Breast Cancer Aetiology.","authors":"Singh Harbinder,&nbsp;Carol A Lazzara,&nbsp;Amar Js Klar","doi":"10.4172/2161-1041.s2-005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Known genetic mutations and familial hereditary factors account for less than 20-25% of breast cancer cases in women, therefore, most instances have been classified as sporadic cases of unknown aetiologies. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were considered as breast cancer risk factors, but numerous studies have failed to support this assertion. Recent evidence correlates aberrant epigenetic mechanisms in the development and metastatic progression of breast cancer, yet there has been limited progress made to identify the primary aetiology underlying sporadic cases of breast cancer. This has led some researchers to consider alternative hypotheses including <i>in utero</i> exposure to deleterious chemical agents during early development, the immortal strand and the strand-specific imprinting and selective chromatid segregation hypotheses. Here, we integrate prominent alternate models to help guide future research on this very important topic concerning human health.</p>","PeriodicalId":90176,"journal":{"name":"Hereditary genetics : current research","volume":"2013 Suppl 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8478350/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hereditary genetics : current research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-1041.s2-005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Known genetic mutations and familial hereditary factors account for less than 20-25% of breast cancer cases in women, therefore, most instances have been classified as sporadic cases of unknown aetiologies. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were considered as breast cancer risk factors, but numerous studies have failed to support this assertion. Recent evidence correlates aberrant epigenetic mechanisms in the development and metastatic progression of breast cancer, yet there has been limited progress made to identify the primary aetiology underlying sporadic cases of breast cancer. This has led some researchers to consider alternative hypotheses including in utero exposure to deleterious chemical agents during early development, the immortal strand and the strand-specific imprinting and selective chromatid segregation hypotheses. Here, we integrate prominent alternate models to help guide future research on this very important topic concerning human health.

Abstract Image

链特异性印迹和分离模型的意义:整合子宫激素暴露,干细胞和侧不对称假说在乳腺癌病因学中。
已知的基因突变和家族遗传因素占妇女乳腺癌病例的不到20-25%,因此,大多数病例被归类为病因不明的散发病例。单核苷酸多态性(snp)被认为是乳腺癌的危险因素,但大量研究未能支持这一主张。最近的证据表明,异常的表观遗传机制与乳腺癌的发生和转移进展有关,但在确定散发性乳腺癌的主要病因方面进展有限。这导致一些研究人员考虑其他假设,包括在发育早期子宫内暴露于有害化学物质,不朽链和链特异性印记以及选择性染色单体分离假设。在这里,我们整合了突出的替代模型,以帮助指导未来对这一非常重要的人类健康主题的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信