Cardiovascular complications of prehospital emergency anaesthesia in patients with return of spontaneous circulation following medical cardiac arrest: a retrospective comparison of ketamine-based and midazolam-based induction protocols.

Emergency medicine journal : EMJ Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-29 DOI:10.1136/emermed-2020-210531
Christopher King, Asher Lewinsohn, Chris Keeliher, Sarah McLachlan, James Sherrin, Hafsah Khan-Cheema, Peter Sherren
{"title":"Cardiovascular complications of prehospital emergency anaesthesia in patients with return of spontaneous circulation following medical cardiac arrest: a retrospective comparison of ketamine-based and midazolam-based induction protocols.","authors":"Christopher King,&nbsp;Asher Lewinsohn,&nbsp;Chris Keeliher,&nbsp;Sarah McLachlan,&nbsp;James Sherrin,&nbsp;Hafsah Khan-Cheema,&nbsp;Peter Sherren","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2020-210531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypotension following intubation and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after cardiac arrest is associated with poorer patient outcomes. In patients with a sustained ROSC requiring emergency anaesthesia, there is limited evidence to guide anaesthetic practice. At the Essex & Herts Air Ambulance Trust, a UK-based helicopter emergency medical service, we assessed the relative haemodynamic stability of two different induction agents for post-cardiac arrest medical patients requiring prehospital emergency anaesthesia (PHEA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective database review over a 5-year period between December 2014 and December 2019 comparing ketamine-based and midazolam-based anaesthesia in this patient cohort. Our primary outcome was clinically significant hypotension within 30 min of PHEA, defined as a new systolic BP less than 90 mm Hg, or a 10% drop if less than 90 mm Hg before induction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred ninety-eight patients met inclusion criteria. Forty-eight patients received a ketamine-based induction, median dose (IQR) 1.00 (1.00-1.55) mg/kg, and a 150 midazolam-based regime, median dose 0.03 (0.02-0.04) mg/kg. Hypotension occurred in 54.2% of the ketamine group and 50.7% of the midazolam group (p=0.673). Mean maximal HRs within 30 min of PHEA were 119 beats/min and 122 beats/min, respectively (p=0.523). A shock index greater than 1.0 beats/min/mm Hg and age greater than 70 years were both associated with post-PHEA hypotension with ORs 1.96 (CI 1.02 to 3.71) and 1.99 (CI 1.01 to 3.90), respectively. Adverse event rates did not significantly differ between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PHEA following a medical cardiac arrest is associated with potentially significant cardiovascular derangements when measured up to 30 min after induction of anaesthesia. There was no demonstrable difference in post-induction hypotension between ketamine-based and midazolam-based PHEA. Choice of induction agent alone is insufficient to mitigate haemodynamic disturbance, and alternative strategies should be used to address this.</p>","PeriodicalId":410922,"journal":{"name":"Emergency medicine journal : EMJ","volume":" ","pages":"672-678"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency medicine journal : EMJ","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-210531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Hypotension following intubation and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after cardiac arrest is associated with poorer patient outcomes. In patients with a sustained ROSC requiring emergency anaesthesia, there is limited evidence to guide anaesthetic practice. At the Essex & Herts Air Ambulance Trust, a UK-based helicopter emergency medical service, we assessed the relative haemodynamic stability of two different induction agents for post-cardiac arrest medical patients requiring prehospital emergency anaesthesia (PHEA).

Methods: We performed a retrospective database review over a 5-year period between December 2014 and December 2019 comparing ketamine-based and midazolam-based anaesthesia in this patient cohort. Our primary outcome was clinically significant hypotension within 30 min of PHEA, defined as a new systolic BP less than 90 mm Hg, or a 10% drop if less than 90 mm Hg before induction.

Results: One hundred ninety-eight patients met inclusion criteria. Forty-eight patients received a ketamine-based induction, median dose (IQR) 1.00 (1.00-1.55) mg/kg, and a 150 midazolam-based regime, median dose 0.03 (0.02-0.04) mg/kg. Hypotension occurred in 54.2% of the ketamine group and 50.7% of the midazolam group (p=0.673). Mean maximal HRs within 30 min of PHEA were 119 beats/min and 122 beats/min, respectively (p=0.523). A shock index greater than 1.0 beats/min/mm Hg and age greater than 70 years were both associated with post-PHEA hypotension with ORs 1.96 (CI 1.02 to 3.71) and 1.99 (CI 1.01 to 3.90), respectively. Adverse event rates did not significantly differ between groups.

Conclusion: PHEA following a medical cardiac arrest is associated with potentially significant cardiovascular derangements when measured up to 30 min after induction of anaesthesia. There was no demonstrable difference in post-induction hypotension between ketamine-based and midazolam-based PHEA. Choice of induction agent alone is insufficient to mitigate haemodynamic disturbance, and alternative strategies should be used to address this.

医学心脏骤停后自发循环恢复患者院前急诊麻醉的心血管并发症:氯胺酮和咪达唑仑诱导方案的回顾性比较
背景:心脏骤停后插管后低血压和自然循环恢复(ROSC)与较差的患者预后相关。对于需要紧急麻醉的持续性ROSC患者,指导麻醉实践的证据有限。在英国直升机紧急医疗服务机构Essex & Herts Air Ambulance Trust,我们评估了两种不同诱导剂对需要院前紧急麻醉(PHEA)的心脏骤停后患者的相对血流动力学稳定性。方法:我们对2014年12月至2019年12月期间的5年数据库进行了回顾性分析,比较了该患者队列中氯胺酮和咪达唑仑的麻醉情况。我们的主要结局是在PHEA 30分钟内出现临床显著性低血压,定义为新收缩压低于90mmhg,或者在诱导前收缩压低于90mmhg时下降10%。结果:198例患者符合纳入标准。48例患者接受以氯胺酮为基础的诱导,中位剂量(IQR) 1.00 (1.00-1.55) mg/kg,以及以150咪达唑仑为基础的诱导,中位剂量0.03 (0.02-0.04)mg/kg。氯胺酮组和咪达唑仑组低血压发生率分别为54.2%和50.7% (p=0.673)。PHEA 30min内最大心率平均值分别为119次/min和122次/min (p=0.523)。休克指数大于1.0次/分钟/毫米汞柱和年龄大于70岁均与phea后低血压相关,or分别为1.96 (CI 1.02 ~ 3.71)和1.99 (CI 1.01 ~ 3.90)。两组间不良事件发生率无显著差异。结论:在麻醉诱导后30分钟内测量心脏骤停后的PHEA与潜在的显著心血管紊乱相关。氯胺酮类和咪达唑仑类PHEA诱导后低血压无明显差异。单独选择诱导剂不足以减轻血流动力学障碍,应采用其他策略来解决这一问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信