Validation and modification of the AJCC 8th TNM staging system for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in a Chinese cohort: A nationwide pancreas data center analysis.

Hao Hu, Chang Qu, Bingjun Tang, Weikang Liu, Yongsu Ma, Yiran Chen, Xuehai Xie, Yan Zhuang, Hongqiao Gao, Xiaodong Tian, Yinmo Yang
{"title":"Validation and modification of the AJCC 8th TNM staging system for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in a Chinese cohort: A nationwide pancreas data center analysis.","authors":"Hao Hu,&nbsp;Chang Qu,&nbsp;Bingjun Tang,&nbsp;Weikang Liu,&nbsp;Yongsu Ma,&nbsp;Yiran Chen,&nbsp;Xuehai Xie,&nbsp;Yan Zhuang,&nbsp;Hongqiao Gao,&nbsp;Xiaodong Tian,&nbsp;Yinmo Yang","doi":"10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.04.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in a Chinese cohort of radically resected patients and to develop a refined staging system for PDAC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from the China Pancreas Data Center (CPDC) for patients with resected PDAC in 2016 and 2017, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses based on Cox regression were performed to identify prognostic factors. The recursive partitioning analysis (RPA), Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank test were performed on the training dataset to generate a proposed modification for the 8th TNM staging system utilizing the preoperative carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 level. Validation was performed for both staging systems in the validation cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,676 PDAC patients were retrieved, and the median CSS was significantly different between the 8th TNM groupings, with no significant difference in survival between stage IB and IIA. The analysis of T and N stages demonstrated a better prognostic value in the N category. Multivariate analysis showed that the preoperative serum CA19-9 level was the strongest prognostic indicator among all the independent risk factors. All patients with CA19-9 >500 U/mL had similar survival, and we proposed a new staging system by combining IB and IIA and stratifying all patients with high CA19-9 into stage III. The modified staging system had a better performance for predicting CSS than the 8th AJCC staging scheme.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 8th AJCC staging system for PDAC is suitable for a Chinese cohort of resected patients, and the N category has a better prognostic value than the T category. Our modified staging system has superior accuracy in predicting survival than the 8th AJCC TNM staging system.</p>","PeriodicalId":9830,"journal":{"name":"Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu","volume":"33 4","pages":"457-469"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/87/c0/cjcr-33-4-457.PMC8435826.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.04.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective: To validate the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in a Chinese cohort of radically resected patients and to develop a refined staging system for PDAC.

Methods: Data were collected from the China Pancreas Data Center (CPDC) for patients with resected PDAC in 2016 and 2017, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses based on Cox regression were performed to identify prognostic factors. The recursive partitioning analysis (RPA), Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank test were performed on the training dataset to generate a proposed modification for the 8th TNM staging system utilizing the preoperative carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 level. Validation was performed for both staging systems in the validation cohort.

Results: A total of 1,676 PDAC patients were retrieved, and the median CSS was significantly different between the 8th TNM groupings, with no significant difference in survival between stage IB and IIA. The analysis of T and N stages demonstrated a better prognostic value in the N category. Multivariate analysis showed that the preoperative serum CA19-9 level was the strongest prognostic indicator among all the independent risk factors. All patients with CA19-9 >500 U/mL had similar survival, and we proposed a new staging system by combining IB and IIA and stratifying all patients with high CA19-9 into stage III. The modified staging system had a better performance for predicting CSS than the 8th AJCC staging scheme.

Conclusions: The 8th AJCC staging system for PDAC is suitable for a Chinese cohort of resected patients, and the N category has a better prognostic value than the T category. Our modified staging system has superior accuracy in predicting survival than the 8th AJCC TNM staging system.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

AJCC胰腺导管腺癌第8期TNM分期系统在中国队列中的验证和修改:一项全国性胰腺数据中心分析。
目的:验证第8版美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)分期系统在中国根治患者队列中的有效性,并建立一个完善的PDAC分期系统。方法:从中国胰腺数据中心(CPDC)收集2016年和2017年PDAC切除术患者的数据,采用Kaplan-Meier法和log-rank检验评估癌症特异性生存(CSS)。采用基于Cox回归的单因素和多因素分析来确定预后因素。对训练数据集进行递归划分分析(RPA)、Kaplan-Meier方法和log-rank检验,以术前碳水化合物抗原(CA)19-9水平为基础,生成第8 TNM分期系统的修改建议。在验证队列中对两种分期系统进行了验证。结果:共检索到1676例PDAC患者,第8个TNM组间的中位CSS有显著差异,IB期和IIA期的生存期无显著差异。对T期和N期的分析表明,N期具有较好的预后价值。多因素分析显示术前血清CA19-9水平是所有独立危险因素中最强的预后指标。所有CA19-9 >500 U/mL的患者生存率相似,我们提出了一种新的分期系统,将IB和IIA相结合,将所有高CA19-9的患者分层为III期。与AJCC第8次分期方案相比,改进后的分期方案对CSS的预测效果更好。结论:AJCC第8期PDAC分期体系适用于中国的PDAC切除患者队列,且N类比T类具有更好的预后价值。我们改进的分期系统在预测生存方面比AJCC第8期TNM分期系统具有更高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信