Quantifying the magnitude of local tendon injury from electrosurgical transection

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Navya Dandu BS , Brad B. Nelson DVM, PhD, DACVS , Jeremiah T. Easley DVM, DACVS , Hailey P. Huddleston BS , Steven F. DeFroda MD , Katie T. Bisazza BS , Grant E. Garrigues MD , Adam B. Yanke MD, PhD
{"title":"Quantifying the magnitude of local tendon injury from electrosurgical transection","authors":"Navya Dandu BS ,&nbsp;Brad B. Nelson DVM, PhD, DACVS ,&nbsp;Jeremiah T. Easley DVM, DACVS ,&nbsp;Hailey P. Huddleston BS ,&nbsp;Steven F. DeFroda MD ,&nbsp;Katie T. Bisazza BS ,&nbsp;Grant E. Garrigues MD ,&nbsp;Adam B. Yanke MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2021.08.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Electrocautery<span> is a common surgical technique and is often used during shoulder arthroplasty<span> to elevate or transect the subscapularis tendon. The relative amount of tissue damage caused by cautery as opposed to sharp transection is not currently known. The purpose of this study was to examine local tissue damage resulting from electrocautery vs. sharp transection with a scalpel. We hypothesized that the electrosurgical unit would cause higher collateral tissue damage and cell death compared with sharp transection.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>Twelve cadaveric ovine shoulders were randomized to either the electrosurgical or sharp transection group. The infraspinatus tendon was isolated, and a partial-thickness transection was made using either a monopolar electrosurgical device (Bovie) or No. 10 scalpel blade. Tendon explants were then visualized with confocal microscopy to evaluate tissue architecture. A live/dead assay was performed using microscopy imaging analysis software. Comparisons between Bovie and scalpel transection were made using the Mann-Whitney </span><em>U</em> test, and the cell death percentage at standardized distances from the transection site was compared between groups using a mixed-model analysis. Significance was defined at <em>P</em> &lt; .05.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The cellular and tendon fibril architecture was well maintained beyond the scalpel transection site, whereas Bovie transection disrupted the architecture beyond its transection path. The percentage of dead cells in the Bovie group (74.9% ± 31.2%) was significantly higher than that in the scalpel group (27.6% ± 29.9%, <em>P</em> = .0004). Compared with the transection site, the cell death percentage after Bovie transection significantly declined at 2.5 mm whereas that after scalpel transection significantly declined at 1 mm from the transection site.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There was a significantly higher dead cell percentage in the Bovie transection group, indicating extensive damage beyond the local incision site, compared with sharp transection. Electrosurgical transection of the ovine infraspinatus tendon ex vivo caused higher cell death and greater tissue architecture disruption compared with sharp scalpel transection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":"31 4","pages":"Pages 832-838"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058274621006923","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Electrocautery is a common surgical technique and is often used during shoulder arthroplasty to elevate or transect the subscapularis tendon. The relative amount of tissue damage caused by cautery as opposed to sharp transection is not currently known. The purpose of this study was to examine local tissue damage resulting from electrocautery vs. sharp transection with a scalpel. We hypothesized that the electrosurgical unit would cause higher collateral tissue damage and cell death compared with sharp transection.

Methods

Twelve cadaveric ovine shoulders were randomized to either the electrosurgical or sharp transection group. The infraspinatus tendon was isolated, and a partial-thickness transection was made using either a monopolar electrosurgical device (Bovie) or No. 10 scalpel blade. Tendon explants were then visualized with confocal microscopy to evaluate tissue architecture. A live/dead assay was performed using microscopy imaging analysis software. Comparisons between Bovie and scalpel transection were made using the Mann-Whitney U test, and the cell death percentage at standardized distances from the transection site was compared between groups using a mixed-model analysis. Significance was defined at P < .05.

Results

The cellular and tendon fibril architecture was well maintained beyond the scalpel transection site, whereas Bovie transection disrupted the architecture beyond its transection path. The percentage of dead cells in the Bovie group (74.9% ± 31.2%) was significantly higher than that in the scalpel group (27.6% ± 29.9%, P = .0004). Compared with the transection site, the cell death percentage after Bovie transection significantly declined at 2.5 mm whereas that after scalpel transection significantly declined at 1 mm from the transection site.

Conclusion

There was a significantly higher dead cell percentage in the Bovie transection group, indicating extensive damage beyond the local incision site, compared with sharp transection. Electrosurgical transection of the ovine infraspinatus tendon ex vivo caused higher cell death and greater tissue architecture disruption compared with sharp scalpel transection.

量化电切局部肌腱损伤程度
背景:电刺激是一种常见的手术技术,常用于肩关节置换术中,以提升或横切肩胛下肌腱。相对于尖锐横断,烧灼造成的组织损伤的相对数量目前尚不清楚。本研究的目的是检查电灼与手术刀锋利横切引起的局部组织损伤。我们假设电刀单元会造成更高的侧支组织损伤和细胞死亡,而不是锋利的横断。方法将12只羊尸肩随机分为电切组和锐切组。分离冈下肌腱,使用单极电手术装置(Bovie)或10号手术刀刀片进行部分厚度横断。然后用共聚焦显微镜观察肌腱外植体以评估组织结构。使用显微镜成像分析软件进行活/死分析。采用Mann-Whitney U检验对Bovie和手术刀横切进行比较,采用混合模型分析比较两组间横切位点标准化距离下的细胞死亡率。P <定义显著性;. 05。结果细胞和肌腱原纤维结构在手术刀横断部位外保持良好,而Bovie横断破坏了其横断路径外的结构。Bovie组死细胞率(74.9%±31.2%)显著高于手术刀组(27.6%±29.9%,P = 0.0004)。与横断部位相比,Bovie横断部位2.5 mm处细胞死亡率显著下降,手术刀横断部位1 mm处细胞死亡率显著下降。结论Bovie横断组的死细胞率明显高于锐横断组,表明局部切口外有广泛的损伤。与锋利的手术刀横断相比,电刀横断离体羊冈下肌腱导致更高的细胞死亡和更大的组织结构破坏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信