Risk Communication After Health Care Exposures: An Experimental Vignette Survey With Patients.

IF 1.7
MDM policy & practice Pub Date : 2021-09-17 eCollection Date: 2021-07-01 DOI:10.1177/23814683211045659
A Rani Elwy, Elizabeth M Maguire, Thomas H Gallagher, Steven M Asch, Janet M Durfee, Richard A Martinello, Barbara G Bokhour, Allen L Gifford, Thomas J Taylor, Todd H Wagner
{"title":"Risk Communication After Health Care Exposures: An Experimental Vignette Survey With Patients.","authors":"A Rani Elwy, Elizabeth M Maguire, Thomas H Gallagher, Steven M Asch, Janet M Durfee, Richard A Martinello, Barbara G Bokhour, Allen L Gifford, Thomas J Taylor, Todd H Wagner","doi":"10.1177/23814683211045659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose.</b> We investigated how health care systems should communicate with patients about possible exposures to blood-borne pathogens that may have occurred during their care. Our goal was to determine how best to communicate uncertain risk information in a way that would minimize harm to patients, maintain their trust, and encourage patients to seek follow-up treatment. <b>Methods.</b> Participants (<i>N</i> = 1103) were randomized to receive one of six vignette surveys; 997 (98.4%) responded. All vignettes described the same event, but differed by risk level and recommendations (lower risk v. higher risk) and by communication mode (telephone, letter, social media). We measured participants' perceived risk of blood-borne infection, trust in the health care system, and shared decision making about next clinical steps. Open-ended questions were analyzed using grounded thematic analysis. <b>Results.</b> When the vignette requested patients to undergo testing and practice certain health behaviors (higher risk), participants' likelihood of seeking follow-up testing for blood-borne pathogens and their understanding of health issues increased. Perceived trust was unaffected by risk level or communication processes. Qualitative data indicated a desire for telephone communication from providers known to the patient. <b>Limitations.</b> It is not clear whether higher risk language or objective risk levels in vignettes motivated patients' behavioral intentions. <b>Conclusion.</b> Using higher risk language when disclosing large-scale adverse events increased participants' willingness to seek follow-up care. <b>Implications.</b> Health care organizations' disclosures should focus on the next steps to take after health care exposures. This communication should involve helping patients to understand their personal health issues better, make them feel that they know which steps to take following the receipt of this information, and encouraging them to seek follow-up infectious disease testing in order to better take care of themselves.</p>","PeriodicalId":520707,"journal":{"name":"MDM policy & practice","volume":" ","pages":"23814683211045659"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9d/33/10.1177_23814683211045659.PMC8451260.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MDM policy & practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683211045659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose. We investigated how health care systems should communicate with patients about possible exposures to blood-borne pathogens that may have occurred during their care. Our goal was to determine how best to communicate uncertain risk information in a way that would minimize harm to patients, maintain their trust, and encourage patients to seek follow-up treatment. Methods. Participants (N = 1103) were randomized to receive one of six vignette surveys; 997 (98.4%) responded. All vignettes described the same event, but differed by risk level and recommendations (lower risk v. higher risk) and by communication mode (telephone, letter, social media). We measured participants' perceived risk of blood-borne infection, trust in the health care system, and shared decision making about next clinical steps. Open-ended questions were analyzed using grounded thematic analysis. Results. When the vignette requested patients to undergo testing and practice certain health behaviors (higher risk), participants' likelihood of seeking follow-up testing for blood-borne pathogens and their understanding of health issues increased. Perceived trust was unaffected by risk level or communication processes. Qualitative data indicated a desire for telephone communication from providers known to the patient. Limitations. It is not clear whether higher risk language or objective risk levels in vignettes motivated patients' behavioral intentions. Conclusion. Using higher risk language when disclosing large-scale adverse events increased participants' willingness to seek follow-up care. Implications. Health care organizations' disclosures should focus on the next steps to take after health care exposures. This communication should involve helping patients to understand their personal health issues better, make them feel that they know which steps to take following the receipt of this information, and encouraging them to seek follow-up infectious disease testing in order to better take care of themselves.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

卫生保健暴露后的风险沟通:一项与患者的实验性小插曲调查。
目的。我们调查了卫生保健系统应如何与患者沟通可能在其护理期间发生的血源性病原体暴露。我们的目标是确定如何最好地传达不确定的风险信息,以减少对患者的伤害,保持他们的信任,并鼓励患者寻求后续治疗。方法。参与者(N = 1103)随机接受六项小问卷调查中的一项;997人(98.4%)回应。所有小短文都描述了同一事件,但因风险水平和建议(低风险vs高风险)以及沟通方式(电话、信件、社交媒体)而有所不同。我们测量了参与者对血源性感染的感知风险,对医疗保健系统的信任,以及对下一步临床步骤的共同决策。开放式问题采用基础专题分析进行分析。结果。当小插曲要求患者接受检测并实践某些健康行为(高风险)时,参与者寻求后续血源性病原体检测的可能性和他们对健康问题的理解增加了。感知信任不受风险水平或沟通过程的影响。定性数据表明,患者希望与已知的医疗服务提供者进行电话沟通。的局限性。目前尚不清楚小插曲中较高的风险语言或客观风险水平是否会激发患者的行为意图。结论。在披露大规模不良事件时使用高风险语言增加了参与者寻求后续护理的意愿。的影响。医疗保健组织的披露应侧重于医疗保健暴露后应采取的后续步骤。这种沟通应包括帮助患者更好地了解他们的个人健康问题,使他们觉得他们知道在收到这些信息后应采取哪些步骤,并鼓励他们寻求后续传染病检测,以便更好地照顾自己。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信