Assessing attitudes of patient-centered care among chiropractic students at a South African university.

IF 0.7 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Fatima Ismail, Christopher Yelverton, Tamaryn Schafer, Cynthia Peterson
{"title":"Assessing attitudes of patient-centered care among chiropractic students at a South African university.","authors":"Fatima Ismail,&nbsp;Christopher Yelverton,&nbsp;Tamaryn Schafer,&nbsp;Cynthia Peterson","doi":"10.7899/JCE-21-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patient-centered care (PCC) is acknowledged globally as a foundation of quality patient care and key to doctor-patient rapport. Student attitudes toward PCC have been assessed in some health professions and some international chiropractic institutions but is lacking in the South African chiropractic student context. This study explores this concept and compares these attitudes to other student groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted on chiropractic students (years 1, 3, 5, and 6) at a South African institution. The 18-item Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS), with scoring 1-6 on a Likert scale, was used to evaluate the attitude toward PCC by students. Higher scores were representative of more patient-centeredness. Variables were analyzed to assess for associations between variables. Mean PPOS scores were calculated, and reliability and validity were tested using Cronbach α and factor analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 100 respondents (68% response rate). The PPOS showed unsatisfactory reliability in our sample. The mean scores for the overall PPOS were 3.64 (SD = 0.46), the sharing subscale was 2.99 (SD = 0.61), and the caring subscale was 4.29 (SD = 0.58). There were small but suggestive trends noticed in PPOS scores based on age, sex, and year of study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Chiropractic students from our university showed a general positive tendency toward PCC with no association between age and year of study. Sex showed some suggestive descriptive trends contrary to findings in other studies. The PPOS showed poor reliability in this study, warranting consideration with its use in similar contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":44516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8895845/pdf/i2374-250X-36-1-94.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-21-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Patient-centered care (PCC) is acknowledged globally as a foundation of quality patient care and key to doctor-patient rapport. Student attitudes toward PCC have been assessed in some health professions and some international chiropractic institutions but is lacking in the South African chiropractic student context. This study explores this concept and compares these attitudes to other student groups.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on chiropractic students (years 1, 3, 5, and 6) at a South African institution. The 18-item Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS), with scoring 1-6 on a Likert scale, was used to evaluate the attitude toward PCC by students. Higher scores were representative of more patient-centeredness. Variables were analyzed to assess for associations between variables. Mean PPOS scores were calculated, and reliability and validity were tested using Cronbach α and factor analysis.

Results: There were 100 respondents (68% response rate). The PPOS showed unsatisfactory reliability in our sample. The mean scores for the overall PPOS were 3.64 (SD = 0.46), the sharing subscale was 2.99 (SD = 0.61), and the caring subscale was 4.29 (SD = 0.58). There were small but suggestive trends noticed in PPOS scores based on age, sex, and year of study.

Conclusions: Chiropractic students from our university showed a general positive tendency toward PCC with no association between age and year of study. Sex showed some suggestive descriptive trends contrary to findings in other studies. The PPOS showed poor reliability in this study, warranting consideration with its use in similar contexts.

评估以病人为中心的护理在一所南非大学的脊医学生的态度。
目的:以患者为中心的护理(PCC)是全球公认的优质患者护理的基础和医患关系的关键。学生对PCC的态度已经在一些卫生专业和一些国际脊医机构进行了评估,但在南非脊医学生的背景下缺乏。本研究探讨了这一概念,并将这些态度与其他学生群体进行了比较。方法:对南非一家机构的捏脊学生(1年级、3年级、5年级和6年级)进行横断面调查。采用李克特量表(Likert Scale) 1-6分的18项病人-医生取向量表(PPOS)评估学生对PCC的态度。得分越高,越以病人为中心。对变量进行分析以评估变量之间的关联。计算PPOS平均得分,采用Cronbach α和因子分析检验信度和效度。结果:调查对象100人,回复率68%。在我们的样品中,PPOS显示出令人不满意的可靠性。总体PPOS得分平均为3.64分(SD = 0.46),分享分量表得分平均为2.99分(SD = 0.61),关怀分量表得分平均为4.29分(SD = 0.58)。根据年龄、性别和学习年份,在PPOS得分中发现了一些虽小但具有启发性的趋势。结论:我校捏脊学生在PCC方面表现出普遍的积极倾向,与年龄和学习年限无关。性别表现出一些与其他研究结果相反的暗示性描述趋势。PPOS在本研究中表现出较差的可靠性,值得考虑在类似背景下使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chiropractic Education
Journal of Chiropractic Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
37.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chiropractic Education is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing research and scholarly articles pertaining to education theory, pedagogy, methodologies, practice, and other content relevant to the health professions academe. Journal contents are of interest to teachers, researchers, clinical educators, administrators, and students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信