Sustaining a Multidisciplinary, Single-Institution, Postoperative Mobilization Clinical Practice Improvement Program Following Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Prospective Cohort Study.

Kai Siang Chan, Bei Wang, Yen Pin Tan, Jaclyn Jie Ling Chow, Ee Ling Ong, Sameer P Junnarkar, Jee Keem Low, Cheong Wei Terence Huey, Vishal G Shelat
{"title":"Sustaining a Multidisciplinary, Single-Institution, Postoperative Mobilization Clinical Practice Improvement Program Following Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Kai Siang Chan,&nbsp;Bei Wang,&nbsp;Yen Pin Tan,&nbsp;Jaclyn Jie Ling Chow,&nbsp;Ee Ling Ong,&nbsp;Sameer P Junnarkar,&nbsp;Jee Keem Low,&nbsp;Cheong Wei Terence Huey,&nbsp;Vishal G Shelat","doi":"10.2196/30473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol has been recently extended to hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery, with excellent outcomes reported. Early mobilization is an essential facet of the ERAS protocol, but compliance has been reported to be poor. We recently reported our success in a 6-month clinical practice improvement program (CPIP) for early postoperative mobilization. During the COVID-19 pandemic, we experienced reduced staffing and resource availability, which can make CPIP sustainability difficult.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We report outcomes at 1 year following the implementation of our CPIP to improve postoperative mobilization in patients undergoing major HPB surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We divided our study into 4 phases-phase 1: before CPIP implementation (January to April 2019); phase 2: CPIP implementation (May to September 2019); phase 3: post-CPIP implementation but prior to the COVID-19 pandemic (October 2019 to March 2020); and phase 4: post-CPIP implementation and during the pandemic (April 2020 to September 2020). Major HPB surgery was defined as any surgery on the liver, pancreas, and biliary system with a duration of >2 hours and with an anticipated blood loss of ≥500 ml. Study variables included length of hospital stay, distance ambulated on postoperative day (POD) 2, morbidity, balance measures (incidence of fall and accidental dislodgement of drains), and reasons for failure to achieve targets. Successful mobilization was defined as the ability to sit out of bed for >6 hours on POD 1 and ambulate ≥30 m on POD 2. The target mobilization rate was ≥75%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 114 patients underwent major HPB surgery from phases 2 to 4 of our study, with 33 (29.0%), 45 (39.5%), and 36 (31.6%) patients in phases 2, 3, and 4, respectively. No baseline patient demographic data were collected for phase 1 (pre-CPIP implementation). The majority of the patients were male (n=79, 69.3%) and underwent hepatic surgery (n=92, 80.7%). A total of 76 (66.7%) patients underwent ON-Q PainBuster insertion intraoperatively. The median mobilization rate was 22% for phase 1, 78% for phases 2 and 3 combined, and 79% for phase 4. The mean pain score was 2.7 (SD 1.0) on POD 1 and 1.8 (SD 1.5) on POD 2. The median length of hospitalization was 6 days (IQR 5-11.8). There were no falls or accidental dislodgement of drains. Six patients (5.3%) had pneumonia, and 21 (18.4%) patients failed to ambulate ≥30 m on POD 2 from phases 2 to 4. The most common reason for failure to achieve the ambulation target was pain (6/21, 28.6%) and lethargy or giddiness (5/21, 23.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This follow-up study demonstrates the sustainability of our CPIP in improving early postoperative mobilization rates following major HPB surgery 1 year after implementation, even during the COVID-19 pandemic. Further large-scale, multi-institutional prospective studies should be conducted to assess compliance and determine its sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":73557,"journal":{"name":"JMIR perioperative medicine","volume":"4 2","pages":"e30473"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8496752/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR perioperative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/30473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol has been recently extended to hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery, with excellent outcomes reported. Early mobilization is an essential facet of the ERAS protocol, but compliance has been reported to be poor. We recently reported our success in a 6-month clinical practice improvement program (CPIP) for early postoperative mobilization. During the COVID-19 pandemic, we experienced reduced staffing and resource availability, which can make CPIP sustainability difficult.

Objective: We report outcomes at 1 year following the implementation of our CPIP to improve postoperative mobilization in patients undergoing major HPB surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: We divided our study into 4 phases-phase 1: before CPIP implementation (January to April 2019); phase 2: CPIP implementation (May to September 2019); phase 3: post-CPIP implementation but prior to the COVID-19 pandemic (October 2019 to March 2020); and phase 4: post-CPIP implementation and during the pandemic (April 2020 to September 2020). Major HPB surgery was defined as any surgery on the liver, pancreas, and biliary system with a duration of >2 hours and with an anticipated blood loss of ≥500 ml. Study variables included length of hospital stay, distance ambulated on postoperative day (POD) 2, morbidity, balance measures (incidence of fall and accidental dislodgement of drains), and reasons for failure to achieve targets. Successful mobilization was defined as the ability to sit out of bed for >6 hours on POD 1 and ambulate ≥30 m on POD 2. The target mobilization rate was ≥75%.

Results: A total of 114 patients underwent major HPB surgery from phases 2 to 4 of our study, with 33 (29.0%), 45 (39.5%), and 36 (31.6%) patients in phases 2, 3, and 4, respectively. No baseline patient demographic data were collected for phase 1 (pre-CPIP implementation). The majority of the patients were male (n=79, 69.3%) and underwent hepatic surgery (n=92, 80.7%). A total of 76 (66.7%) patients underwent ON-Q PainBuster insertion intraoperatively. The median mobilization rate was 22% for phase 1, 78% for phases 2 and 3 combined, and 79% for phase 4. The mean pain score was 2.7 (SD 1.0) on POD 1 and 1.8 (SD 1.5) on POD 2. The median length of hospitalization was 6 days (IQR 5-11.8). There were no falls or accidental dislodgement of drains. Six patients (5.3%) had pneumonia, and 21 (18.4%) patients failed to ambulate ≥30 m on POD 2 from phases 2 to 4. The most common reason for failure to achieve the ambulation target was pain (6/21, 28.6%) and lethargy or giddiness (5/21, 23.8%).

Conclusions: This follow-up study demonstrates the sustainability of our CPIP in improving early postoperative mobilization rates following major HPB surgery 1 year after implementation, even during the COVID-19 pandemic. Further large-scale, multi-institutional prospective studies should be conducted to assess compliance and determine its sustainability.

Abstract Image

在COVID-19大流行期间维持肝胆胰手术后多学科、单机构、术后动员临床实践改进计划:前瞻性队列研究
背景:增强术后恢复(ERAS)方案最近已扩展到肝胆胰(HPB)手术,并报道了良好的结果。早期动员是ERAS方案的一个重要方面,但据报道,执行情况很差。我们最近报道了一项为期6个月的临床实践改进计划(CPIP)在术后早期活动方面的成功。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,我们经历了人员配备和资源可用性的减少,这可能使CPIP的可持续性变得困难。目的:我们报告实施CPIP后1年的结果,以改善COVID-19大流行期间接受大HPB手术的患者术后活动。方法:我们将研究分为4个阶段:第一阶段:实施CPIP前(2019年1月至4月);第二阶段:CPIP实施(2019年5月至9月);第三阶段:实施cpip后但在COVID-19大流行之前(2019年10月至2020年3月);第4阶段:实施cpip后和大流行期间(2020年4月至2020年9月)。大HPB手术被定义为任何持续时间>2小时且预期失血量≥500 ml的肝脏、胰腺和胆道系统的手术。研究变量包括住院时间、术后行走距离(POD) 2、发病率、平衡措施(跌倒和意外排水管移位的发生率)以及未能达到目标的原因。成功活动的定义是能够在POD 1下坐床>6小时,在POD 2下行走≥30米。目标动员率≥75%。结果:我们研究的2 - 4期共有114例患者接受了大HPB手术,其中2、3、4期患者分别为33例(29.0%)、45例(39.5%)和36例(31.6%)。第一阶段(实施cpip前)未收集基线患者人口统计数据。患者以男性居多(n=79, 69.3%),并行肝脏手术(n=92, 80.7%)。共有76例(66.7%)患者在术中植入ON-Q PainBuster。第1期的中位动员率为22%,第2期和第3期合并为78%,第4期为79%。POD 1的平均疼痛评分为2.7 (SD 1.0), POD 2的平均疼痛评分为1.8 (SD 1.5)。中位住院时间为6天(IQR 5-11.8)。没有发生坠落或排水管意外移位的情况。6例(5.3%)患者有肺炎,21例(18.4%)患者在第2期至第4期POD 2中未能行走≥30 m。未能达到行走目标的最常见原因是疼痛(6/ 21,28.6%)和嗜睡或头晕(5/ 21,23.8%)。结论:这项随访研究表明,即使在COVID-19大流行期间,我们的CPIP在实施大HPB手术后1年改善术后早期活动率方面的可持续性。应进行进一步的大规模、多机构前瞻性研究,以评估遵守情况并确定其可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信