Efficacy and Safety of Cryoneurolysis for Treatment of Chronic Head Pain Secondary to Occipital Neuralgia: A Pilot Study.

IF 1.5 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Local and Regional Anesthesia Pub Date : 2021-09-17 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/LRA.S324527
Eric Grigsby, Richard Radnovich, Srinivas Nalamachu
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Cryoneurolysis for Treatment of Chronic Head Pain Secondary to Occipital Neuralgia: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Eric Grigsby,&nbsp;Richard Radnovich,&nbsp;Srinivas Nalamachu","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S324527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Treatment of chronic pain associated with occipital neuralgia (ON) is complex, and no consensus statement or guidelines have been published for ON management. This pilot study evaluated the efficacy and safety of cryoneurolysis for management of ON-associated chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The study was a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized cohort study assessing the degree and duration of clinical effect of cryoneurolysis therapy for reducing pain in patients diagnosed with unilateral or bilateral ON. The primary outcome measure was improvement in pain due to ON from baseline to day 7, measured on an 11-point numeric rating scale for pain. Secondary outcome measures included duration of treatment effects and safety events, including anticipated observations and adverse events. Treatment effect was assessed at days 7, 30, and 56 by asking the patient if they were continuing to experience a treatment effect, with potential responses of \"effect,\" \"no effect,\" or \"no longer effective.\" A posttreatment questionnaire evaluated patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six patients (9 men, 17 women) with a mean age of 49.1 years enrolled and completed the study. A total of 64% (16/25) of participants reported a clinically important improvement of ≥2 points in numeric rating scale pain scores at day 7; similar results persisted to day 30. Treatment effects were reported by 50% (13/26) of participants at day 30, with a continued effect reported by 35% (9/26) of participants at day 56. Overall, ~70% of participants were satisfied with treatment at 7, 30, and 56 days. No serious anticipated observations, adverse events, or unanticipated adverse device effects were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cryoneurolysis provided significant relief from pain associated with ON ≤30 days after treatment and had an acceptable safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"14 ","pages":"125-132"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ff/ea/lra-14-125.PMC8455510.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S324527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Treatment of chronic pain associated with occipital neuralgia (ON) is complex, and no consensus statement or guidelines have been published for ON management. This pilot study evaluated the efficacy and safety of cryoneurolysis for management of ON-associated chronic pain.

Patients and methods: The study was a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized cohort study assessing the degree and duration of clinical effect of cryoneurolysis therapy for reducing pain in patients diagnosed with unilateral or bilateral ON. The primary outcome measure was improvement in pain due to ON from baseline to day 7, measured on an 11-point numeric rating scale for pain. Secondary outcome measures included duration of treatment effects and safety events, including anticipated observations and adverse events. Treatment effect was assessed at days 7, 30, and 56 by asking the patient if they were continuing to experience a treatment effect, with potential responses of "effect," "no effect," or "no longer effective." A posttreatment questionnaire evaluated patient satisfaction.

Results: Twenty-six patients (9 men, 17 women) with a mean age of 49.1 years enrolled and completed the study. A total of 64% (16/25) of participants reported a clinically important improvement of ≥2 points in numeric rating scale pain scores at day 7; similar results persisted to day 30. Treatment effects were reported by 50% (13/26) of participants at day 30, with a continued effect reported by 35% (9/26) of participants at day 56. Overall, ~70% of participants were satisfied with treatment at 7, 30, and 56 days. No serious anticipated observations, adverse events, or unanticipated adverse device effects were reported.

Conclusion: Cryoneurolysis provided significant relief from pain associated with ON ≤30 days after treatment and had an acceptable safety profile.

Abstract Image

冷冻神经溶解治疗继发于枕神经痛的慢性头痛的有效性和安全性:一项初步研究。
目的:慢性疼痛与枕神经痛(ON)的治疗是复杂的,并没有共识的声明或指南已发表的ON管理。这项初步研究评估了冷冻神经溶解治疗on相关慢性疼痛的有效性和安全性。患者和方法:该研究是一项前瞻性、多中心、非随机队列研究,评估了单侧或双侧ON患者使用冷冻神经溶解治疗减轻疼痛的临床效果的程度和持续时间。主要结局指标是从基线到第7天因ON引起的疼痛的改善,以11分的疼痛数值评定量表进行测量。次要结局指标包括治疗效果持续时间和安全事件,包括预期观察和不良事件。在第7、30和56天评估治疗效果,通过询问患者是否继续经历治疗效果,潜在的回答是“有效”、“没有效果”或“不再有效”。治疗后问卷评估患者满意度。结果:26例患者(男9例,女17例)入组并完成研究,平均年龄49.1岁。在第7天,共有64%(16/25)的参与者报告了数值评定量表疼痛评分≥2分的临床重要改善;类似的结果持续到第30天。在第30天,50%(13/26)的参与者报告了治疗效果,在第56天,35%(9/26)的参与者报告了持续的效果。总体而言,约70%的参与者在第7、30和56天对治疗感到满意。没有严重的预期观察、不良事件或意外的不良器械效应报告。结论:在治疗后≤30天,冷冻神经松解术可以显著缓解与ON相关的疼痛,并且具有可接受的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信