POLICY POLARIZATION AND DEATH IN THE UNITED STATES.

Q2 Social Sciences
Temple Law Review Pub Date : 2020-01-01
Jennifer Karas Montez
{"title":"POLICY POLARIZATION AND DEATH IN THE UNITED STATES.","authors":"Jennifer Karas Montez","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The United States currently ranks last among high-income countries for life expectancy. Since 2014, U.S. life expectancy has declined. By now, these alarming trends are well known to researchers, the public, and policymakers. Nevertheless, there is no consensus among researchers on the causes of the trends, and there has been no serious and effective bipartisan effort to solve the problem. The dominant narrative has implicated Americans' behaviors, such as smoking, illicit drug use, and suicide; yet, this narrative is misguided and counterproductive. It also exonerates the key structural drivers of behaviors and health, namely the U.S. policy context and the outsized influence of corporations and big donors on those policies. The U.S. policy context has changed dramatically since the 1970s, particularly at the state level. State policies have hyperpolarized along partisan lines. These changes have likely had a profound impact on nearly every aspect of Americans' lives, cutting short many of them. Consequently, this Essay argues that state policies increasingly affect life and death in the United States. It raises concerns about how the polarization of state policies will further deteriorate the health of many Americans. It points to three significant forces behind the polarization and the growing importance of state policy contexts on Americans' lives-(1) New Federalism; (2) the new type of state preemption laws; and (3) the emergence of organizations, such as the American Legislative Exchange Council, through which corporations and big donors influence policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":53568,"journal":{"name":"Temple Law Review","volume":"92 4","pages":"889-916"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8442849/pdf/nihms-1585519.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Temple Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The United States currently ranks last among high-income countries for life expectancy. Since 2014, U.S. life expectancy has declined. By now, these alarming trends are well known to researchers, the public, and policymakers. Nevertheless, there is no consensus among researchers on the causes of the trends, and there has been no serious and effective bipartisan effort to solve the problem. The dominant narrative has implicated Americans' behaviors, such as smoking, illicit drug use, and suicide; yet, this narrative is misguided and counterproductive. It also exonerates the key structural drivers of behaviors and health, namely the U.S. policy context and the outsized influence of corporations and big donors on those policies. The U.S. policy context has changed dramatically since the 1970s, particularly at the state level. State policies have hyperpolarized along partisan lines. These changes have likely had a profound impact on nearly every aspect of Americans' lives, cutting short many of them. Consequently, this Essay argues that state policies increasingly affect life and death in the United States. It raises concerns about how the polarization of state policies will further deteriorate the health of many Americans. It points to three significant forces behind the polarization and the growing importance of state policy contexts on Americans' lives-(1) New Federalism; (2) the new type of state preemption laws; and (3) the emergence of organizations, such as the American Legislative Exchange Council, through which corporations and big donors influence policies.

美国的政策两极分化与死亡。
在高收入国家中,美国目前的预期寿命排名垫底。自2014年以来,美国人的预期寿命有所下降。到目前为止,这些令人担忧的趋势已经为研究人员、公众和政策制定者所熟知。然而,研究人员对这种趋势的原因没有达成共识,两党也没有认真有效的努力来解决这个问题。主流叙事将美国人的行为,如吸烟、非法药物使用和自杀,联系在一起;然而,这种说法是错误的,而且适得其反。它还免除了行为和健康的关键结构性驱动因素,即美国的政策背景以及公司和大捐助者对这些政策的巨大影响。自20世纪70年代以来,美国的政策环境发生了巨大变化,尤其是在州一级。各州的政策沿着党派路线极端分化。这些变化可能对美国人生活的几乎每一个方面都产生了深远的影响,缩短了许多人的寿命。因此,本文认为,国家政策对美国人的生与死的影响越来越大。这引发了人们对各州政策两极分化将如何进一步恶化许多美国人健康状况的担忧。它指出了两极分化背后的三个重要力量,以及州政策背景对美国人生活的重要性日益增加——(1)新联邦制;(二)新型国家优先购买法;(3)组织的出现,如美国立法交流委员会,公司和大捐助者通过这些组织影响政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Temple Law Review
Temple Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Temple Law Review is a student-edited scholarly journal that publishes four issues per year with a circulation of approximately 1,500 copies per issue. The Law Review staff is dedicated to providing a forum for the expression of new legal thought and scholarly commentary on important developments, trends, and issues in the law. Each issue contains articles written by judges, legal scholars, or practitioners, as well as recent notes and comments written by members of the Law Review staff.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信