In vitro and integrated in vivo strategies to reduce animal use in genotoxicity testing.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Katherine Groff, Stephen J Evans, Shareen H Doak, Stefan Pfuhler, Raffaella Corvi, Samantha Saunders, Gilly Stoddart
{"title":"In vitro and integrated in vivo strategies to reduce animal use in genotoxicity testing.","authors":"Katherine Groff,&nbsp;Stephen J Evans,&nbsp;Shareen H Doak,&nbsp;Stefan Pfuhler,&nbsp;Raffaella Corvi,&nbsp;Samantha Saunders,&nbsp;Gilly Stoddart","doi":"10.1093/mutage/geab035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Scientific, financial, and ethical drivers have led to unprecedented interest in implementing human-relevant, mechanistic in vitro and in silico testing approaches. Further, as non-animal approaches are being developed and validated, researchers are interested in strategies that can immediately reduce the use of animals in toxicology testing. Here, we aim to outline a testing strategy for assessing genotoxicity beginning with standard in vitro methods, such as the bacterial reverse mutation test and the in vitro micronucleus test, followed by a second tier of in vitro assays including those using advanced 3D tissue models. Where regulatory agencies require in vivo testing, one demonstrated strategy is to combine genotoxicity studies traditionally conducted separately into a single test or to integrate genotoxicity studies into other toxicity studies. Standard setting organisations and regulatory agencies have encouraged such strategies, and examples of their use can be found in the scientific literature. Employing approaches outlined here will reduce animal use as well as study time and costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/geab035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Scientific, financial, and ethical drivers have led to unprecedented interest in implementing human-relevant, mechanistic in vitro and in silico testing approaches. Further, as non-animal approaches are being developed and validated, researchers are interested in strategies that can immediately reduce the use of animals in toxicology testing. Here, we aim to outline a testing strategy for assessing genotoxicity beginning with standard in vitro methods, such as the bacterial reverse mutation test and the in vitro micronucleus test, followed by a second tier of in vitro assays including those using advanced 3D tissue models. Where regulatory agencies require in vivo testing, one demonstrated strategy is to combine genotoxicity studies traditionally conducted separately into a single test or to integrate genotoxicity studies into other toxicity studies. Standard setting organisations and regulatory agencies have encouraged such strategies, and examples of their use can be found in the scientific literature. Employing approaches outlined here will reduce animal use as well as study time and costs.

体外和体内综合策略,以减少遗传毒性试验中动物的使用。
科学、金融和道德驱动因素导致人们对实施与人类相关的、机械的体外和计算机测试方法产生了前所未有的兴趣。此外,随着非动物方法的开发和验证,研究人员对能够立即减少毒理学试验中动物使用的策略感兴趣。在这里,我们的目标是概述一种评估遗传毒性的测试策略,从标准的体外方法开始,如细菌反向突变测试和体外微核试验,然后是第二层体外分析,包括使用先进的3D组织模型的测试。当监管机构要求进行体内试验时,一种已证实的策略是将传统上分别进行的遗传毒性研究合并为单一试验,或将遗传毒性研究整合到其他毒性研究中。制定标准的组织和管理机构鼓励这种策略,它们的使用例子可以在科学文献中找到。采用这里概述的方法将减少动物的使用,以及研究的时间和成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信