Establishing Entrustable Professional Activities in Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care.

David K Werho, Aaron G DeWitt, Sonal T Owens, Mary E McBride, Sandrijn van Schaik, Stephen J Roth
{"title":"Establishing Entrustable Professional Activities in Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care.","authors":"David K Werho,&nbsp;Aaron G DeWitt,&nbsp;Sonal T Owens,&nbsp;Mary E McBride,&nbsp;Sandrijn van Schaik,&nbsp;Stephen J Roth","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000002833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Define a set of entrustable professional activities for pediatric cardiac critical care that are recognized as the core activities of the subspecialty by a diverse group of pediatric cardiac critical care physicians and that can be broadly and consistently applied irrespective of training pathway.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Mixed methods study with sequential integration of qualitative and quantitative data.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Structured telephone interviews of pediatric cardiac critical care medical directors at Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium centers followed by an electronic survey of pediatric cardiac critical care physician members of the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Society from across the United States and internationally.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Pediatric cardiac intensive care physicians.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Twenty-four of 26 eligible Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium medical directors participated in the interviews. Based on qualitative analyses of interview data, we identified an initial set of nine entrustable professional activities. Fifty-eight of 185 eligible physicians completed a subsequent survey asking them to rate their agreement with the entrustable professional activities. It showed consensus (> 80% agreement) with the entire initial set of entrustable professional activities, with greater than 96% agreement in most cases. The feedback from free-text survey responses was incorporated to generate a final set of entrustable professional activities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We generated a set of nine entrustable professional activities, which we believe can be broadly applied to any physician training in pediatric cardiac critical care, irrespective of individual training pathway. Next steps include incorporation of these entrustable professional activities into curriculum design and trainee assessment tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":520744,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies","volume":" ","pages":"54-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000002833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Objectives: Define a set of entrustable professional activities for pediatric cardiac critical care that are recognized as the core activities of the subspecialty by a diverse group of pediatric cardiac critical care physicians and that can be broadly and consistently applied irrespective of training pathway.

Design: Mixed methods study with sequential integration of qualitative and quantitative data.

Setting: Structured telephone interviews of pediatric cardiac critical care medical directors at Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium centers followed by an electronic survey of pediatric cardiac critical care physician members of the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Society from across the United States and internationally.

Subjects: Pediatric cardiac intensive care physicians.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Twenty-four of 26 eligible Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium medical directors participated in the interviews. Based on qualitative analyses of interview data, we identified an initial set of nine entrustable professional activities. Fifty-eight of 185 eligible physicians completed a subsequent survey asking them to rate their agreement with the entrustable professional activities. It showed consensus (> 80% agreement) with the entire initial set of entrustable professional activities, with greater than 96% agreement in most cases. The feedback from free-text survey responses was incorporated to generate a final set of entrustable professional activities.

Conclusions: We generated a set of nine entrustable professional activities, which we believe can be broadly applied to any physician training in pediatric cardiac critical care, irrespective of individual training pathway. Next steps include incorporation of these entrustable professional activities into curriculum design and trainee assessment tools.

建立可信赖的儿科心脏重症监护专业活动。
目标:定义一套可信赖的儿科心脏重症监护专业活动,这些活动被不同的儿科心脏重症监护医生认可为亚专科的核心活动,并且可以广泛和一致地应用,无论培训途径如何。设计:混合方法研究,顺序整合定性和定量数据。背景:对儿童心脏重症监护联盟中心的儿童心脏重症监护医学主任进行结构化电话访谈,随后对美国和全球儿童心脏重症监护协会的儿童心脏重症监护医师成员进行电子调查。研究对象:儿科心脏重症监护医师。干预措施:没有。测量和主要结果:26名符合条件的儿科心脏危重监护协会医学主任中有24人参加了访谈。基于访谈数据的定性分析,我们确定了一套最初的九种可信赖的专业活动。185名合格医生中的58名完成了随后的调查,要求他们对可信赖的专业活动进行评分。它与整个初始的可信赖的专业活动一致(> 80%同意),在大多数情况下,一致性大于96%。从自由文本的调查答复中得到的反馈被纳入最后一套可信赖的专业活动。结论:我们制定了一套九项可信赖的专业活动,我们相信这些活动可以广泛应用于任何儿科心脏重症监护医师培训,而不考虑个人培训途径。接下来的步骤包括将这些可信赖的专业活动纳入课程设计和学员评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信