Orocutaneous Fistula After Oral Cavity Resection and Reconstruction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Patrick Tassone, Tabitha Galloway, Laura Dooley, Robert Zitsch
{"title":"Orocutaneous Fistula After Oral Cavity Resection and Reconstruction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Patrick Tassone,&nbsp;Tabitha Galloway,&nbsp;Laura Dooley,&nbsp;Robert Zitsch","doi":"10.1177/00034894211047463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Orocutaneous fistula (OCF) after reconstruction for oral cavity resection can lead to prolonged hospitalization and adjuvant treatment delay. Few studies have examined factors leading to OCF after oral cavity resection. Primary objective: evaluate overall incidence and factors associated with OCF after oral cavity reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Scopus 1960-database was searched for terms: \"orocutaneous fistula,\" \"oro cutaneous fistula,\" \"oral cutaneous fistula,\" \"orocervical fistula,\" \"oral cavity salivary fistula.\"</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>English language studies with >5 patients undergoing reconstruction after oral cavity cancer resection were included. About 1057 records initially screened; 214 full texts assessed; 78 full-texts included. PRISMA guidelines were followed, and MINORS criteria used to assess risk of bias. Data were pooled using random-effects model. Primary outcome was OCF incidence. Meta-analysis to determine the effect of preoperative radiation on OCF conducted on 12 eligible studies. Pre-collection hypothesis was that prior radiation therapy is associated with increased OCF incidence. Post-collection analyses: free versus pedicled flaps; mandible-sparing versus segmental mandibulectomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-eight studies were included in meta-analysis of overall OCF incidence. Pooled effect size showed overall incidence of OCF to be 7.71% (95% CI, 6.28%-9.13%) among 5400 patients. Meta-analysis of preoperative radiation therapy on OCF showed a pooled odds ratio of 1.68 (95% CI, 0.93-3.06). OCF incidence was similar between patients undergoing free versus pedicled reconstruction, or segmental mandibulectomy versus mandible-sparing resection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Orocutaneous fistula after oral cavity resection has significant incidence and clinical impact. Risk of OCF persists despite advances in reconstructive options; there is a trend toward higher risk after prior radiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":520787,"journal":{"name":"The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"880-891"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894211047463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objective: Orocutaneous fistula (OCF) after reconstruction for oral cavity resection can lead to prolonged hospitalization and adjuvant treatment delay. Few studies have examined factors leading to OCF after oral cavity resection. Primary objective: evaluate overall incidence and factors associated with OCF after oral cavity reconstruction.

Data sources: Scopus 1960-database was searched for terms: "orocutaneous fistula," "oro cutaneous fistula," "oral cutaneous fistula," "orocervical fistula," "oral cavity salivary fistula."

Review methods: English language studies with >5 patients undergoing reconstruction after oral cavity cancer resection were included. About 1057 records initially screened; 214 full texts assessed; 78 full-texts included. PRISMA guidelines were followed, and MINORS criteria used to assess risk of bias. Data were pooled using random-effects model. Primary outcome was OCF incidence. Meta-analysis to determine the effect of preoperative radiation on OCF conducted on 12 eligible studies. Pre-collection hypothesis was that prior radiation therapy is associated with increased OCF incidence. Post-collection analyses: free versus pedicled flaps; mandible-sparing versus segmental mandibulectomy.

Results: Seventy-eight studies were included in meta-analysis of overall OCF incidence. Pooled effect size showed overall incidence of OCF to be 7.71% (95% CI, 6.28%-9.13%) among 5400 patients. Meta-analysis of preoperative radiation therapy on OCF showed a pooled odds ratio of 1.68 (95% CI, 0.93-3.06). OCF incidence was similar between patients undergoing free versus pedicled reconstruction, or segmental mandibulectomy versus mandible-sparing resection.

Conclusion: Orocutaneous fistula after oral cavity resection has significant incidence and clinical impact. Risk of OCF persists despite advances in reconstructive options; there is a trend toward higher risk after prior radiation.

口腔切除和重建后的口皮瘘:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:口腔切除术重建后的口皮瘘(OCF)可导致住院时间延长和辅助治疗延误。很少有研究探讨导致口腔切除术后OCF的因素。主要目的:评估口腔重建后OCF的总体发生率及相关因素。资料来源:Scopus 1960数据库检索术语:“口腔皮瘘”、“口腔皮瘘”、“口腔皮瘘”、“口腔颈瘘”、“口腔唾液瘘”。回顾方法:纳入5例以上口腔癌切除术后重建患者的英语语言研究。最初筛选的约1057条记录;评估了214篇全文;全文共78篇。遵循PRISMA指南,使用未成年人标准评估偏倚风险。采用随机效应模型对数据进行汇总。主要终点为OCF发生率。对12项符合条件的研究进行了meta分析,以确定术前放疗对OCF的影响。收集前假设是先前的放射治疗与OCF发病率增加有关。采集后分析:游离皮瓣与带蒂皮瓣;保留下颌骨与节段性下颌骨切除术。结果:78项研究被纳入总体OCF发病率的荟萃分析。合并效应大小显示,在5400例患者中,OCF的总发生率为7.71% (95% CI, 6.28%-9.13%)。术前放疗对OCF的meta分析显示合并优势比为1.68 (95% CI, 0.93-3.06)。在接受游离与带蒂重建,或节段性下颌骨切除术与保留下颌骨切除术的患者中,OCF发生率相似。结论:口腔切除术后口皮瘘发生率及临床影响显著。尽管重建方案有所进展,但OCF的风险仍然存在;既往放疗后的风险有增加的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信