Study protocol for a type III hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of strategies to implement firearm safety promotion as a universal suicide prevention strategy in pediatric primary care.

Rinad S Beidas, Brian K Ahmedani, Kristin A Linn, Steven C Marcus, Christina Johnson, Melissa Maye, Joslyn Westphal, Leslie Wright, Arne L Beck, Alison M Buttenheim, Matthew F Daley, Molly Davis, Marisa E Elias, Shari Jager-Hyman, Katelin Hoskins, Adina Lieberman, Bridget McArdle, Debra P Ritzwoller, Dylan S Small, Courtney Benjamin Wolk, Nathaniel J Williams, Jennifer M Boggs
{"title":"Study protocol for a type III hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of strategies to implement firearm safety promotion as a universal suicide prevention strategy in pediatric primary care.","authors":"Rinad S Beidas,&nbsp;Brian K Ahmedani,&nbsp;Kristin A Linn,&nbsp;Steven C Marcus,&nbsp;Christina Johnson,&nbsp;Melissa Maye,&nbsp;Joslyn Westphal,&nbsp;Leslie Wright,&nbsp;Arne L Beck,&nbsp;Alison M Buttenheim,&nbsp;Matthew F Daley,&nbsp;Molly Davis,&nbsp;Marisa E Elias,&nbsp;Shari Jager-Hyman,&nbsp;Katelin Hoskins,&nbsp;Adina Lieberman,&nbsp;Bridget McArdle,&nbsp;Debra P Ritzwoller,&nbsp;Dylan S Small,&nbsp;Courtney Benjamin Wolk,&nbsp;Nathaniel J Williams,&nbsp;Jennifer M Boggs","doi":"10.1186/s13012-021-01154-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Insights from behavioral economics, or how individuals' decisions and behaviors are shaped by finite cognitive resources (e.g., time, attention) and mental heuristics, have been underutilized in efforts to increase the use of evidence-based practices in implementation science. Using the example of firearm safety promotion in pediatric primary care, which addresses an evidence-to-practice gap in universal suicide prevention, we aim to determine: is a less costly and more scalable behavioral economic-informed implementation strategy (i.e., \"Nudge\") powerful enough to change clinician behavior or is a more intensive and expensive facilitation strategy needed to overcome implementation barriers?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Adolescent and child Suicide Prevention in Routine clinical Encounters (ASPIRE) hybrid type III effectiveness-implementation trial uses a longitudinal cluster randomized design. We will test the comparative effectiveness of two implementation strategies to support clinicians' use of an evidence-based firearm safety practice, S.A.F.E. Firearm, in 32 pediatric practices across two health systems. All pediatric practices in the two health systems will receive S.A.F.E. Firearm materials, including training and cable locks. Half of the practices (k = 16) will be randomized to receive Nudge; the other half (k = 16) will be randomized to receive Nudge plus 1 year of facilitation to target additional practice and clinician implementation barriers (Nudge+). The primary implementation outcome is parent-reported clinician fidelity to the S.A.F.E Firearm program. Secondary implementation outcomes include reach and cost. To understand how the implementation strategies work, the primary mechanism to be tested is practice adaptive reserve, a self-report practice-level measure that includes relationship infrastructure, facilitative leadership, sense-making, teamwork, work environment, and culture of learning.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The ASPIRE trial will integrate implementation science and behavioral economic approaches to advance our understanding of methods for implementing evidence-based firearm safety promotion practices in pediatric primary care. The study answers a question at the heart of many practice change efforts: which strategies are sufficient to support change, and why? Results of the trial will offer valuable insights into how best to implement evidence-based practices that address sensitive health matters in pediatric primary care.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04844021 . Registered 14 April 2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":417097,"journal":{"name":"Implementation Science : IS","volume":" ","pages":"89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8456701/pdf/","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation Science : IS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01154-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Background: Insights from behavioral economics, or how individuals' decisions and behaviors are shaped by finite cognitive resources (e.g., time, attention) and mental heuristics, have been underutilized in efforts to increase the use of evidence-based practices in implementation science. Using the example of firearm safety promotion in pediatric primary care, which addresses an evidence-to-practice gap in universal suicide prevention, we aim to determine: is a less costly and more scalable behavioral economic-informed implementation strategy (i.e., "Nudge") powerful enough to change clinician behavior or is a more intensive and expensive facilitation strategy needed to overcome implementation barriers?

Methods: The Adolescent and child Suicide Prevention in Routine clinical Encounters (ASPIRE) hybrid type III effectiveness-implementation trial uses a longitudinal cluster randomized design. We will test the comparative effectiveness of two implementation strategies to support clinicians' use of an evidence-based firearm safety practice, S.A.F.E. Firearm, in 32 pediatric practices across two health systems. All pediatric practices in the two health systems will receive S.A.F.E. Firearm materials, including training and cable locks. Half of the practices (k = 16) will be randomized to receive Nudge; the other half (k = 16) will be randomized to receive Nudge plus 1 year of facilitation to target additional practice and clinician implementation barriers (Nudge+). The primary implementation outcome is parent-reported clinician fidelity to the S.A.F.E Firearm program. Secondary implementation outcomes include reach and cost. To understand how the implementation strategies work, the primary mechanism to be tested is practice adaptive reserve, a self-report practice-level measure that includes relationship infrastructure, facilitative leadership, sense-making, teamwork, work environment, and culture of learning.

Discussion: The ASPIRE trial will integrate implementation science and behavioral economic approaches to advance our understanding of methods for implementing evidence-based firearm safety promotion practices in pediatric primary care. The study answers a question at the heart of many practice change efforts: which strategies are sufficient to support change, and why? Results of the trial will offer valuable insights into how best to implement evidence-based practices that address sensitive health matters in pediatric primary care.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04844021 . Registered 14 April 2021.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

将枪支安全推广作为儿科初级保健普遍自杀预防策略的III型混合有效性-实施策略试验研究方案。
背景:行为经济学的见解,或者个人的决策和行为是如何被有限的认知资源(如时间、注意力)和心理启发式所塑造的,在努力增加实施科学中基于证据的实践的使用方面尚未得到充分利用。以儿科初级保健中的枪支安全推广为例,解决了普遍自杀预防中证据到实践的差距,我们的目标是确定:是一种成本更低、更可扩展的行为经济学实施策略(即“轻推”)足以改变临床医生的行为,还是需要一种更密集、更昂贵的促进策略来克服实施障碍?方法:青少年和儿童自杀预防在常规临床接触(ASPIRE)混合III型有效性-实施试验采用纵向聚类随机设计。我们将测试两种实施策略的比较有效性,以支持临床医生在两个卫生系统的32个儿科实践中使用基于证据的枪支安全实践,即S.A.F.E.火器。这两个卫生系统的所有儿科诊所都将收到S.A.F.E.的枪支材料,包括培训和电缆锁。一半的实践(k = 16)将随机接受Nudge;另一半(k = 16)将被随机分配,接受助推+ 1年的促进,以针对额外的实践和临床医生实施障碍(助推+)。主要的实施结果是家长报告的临床医生对S.A.F.E火器项目的忠诚。次要实施结果包括覆盖范围和成本。为了理解实施策略是如何起作用的,需要测试的主要机制是实践适应性储备,这是一种自我报告的实践水平测量,包括关系基础设施、促进型领导、意义制定、团队合作、工作环境和学习文化。讨论:ASPIRE试验将整合实施科学和行为经济学方法,以促进我们对在儿科初级保健中实施循证枪支安全促进实践方法的理解。这项研究回答了许多实践变革努力的核心问题:哪些策略足以支持变革,为什么?该试验的结果将为如何最好地实施以证据为基础的实践,解决儿科初级保健中敏感的健康问题提供有价值的见解。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04844021。注册于2021年4月14日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信