Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of the Hybrid Ceramic Characterization Layer.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Manassés Tercio Vieira Grangeiro, Natalia Rivoli Rossi, Larissa Araújo Lopes Barreto, Marco Antonio Bottino, João Paulo Mendes Tribst
{"title":"Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of the Hybrid Ceramic Characterization Layer.","authors":"Manassés Tercio Vieira Grangeiro,&nbsp;Natalia Rivoli Rossi,&nbsp;Larissa Araújo Lopes Barreto,&nbsp;Marco Antonio Bottino,&nbsp;João Paulo Mendes Tribst","doi":"10.3290/j.jad.b2000235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Using the microshear bond strength (µSBS) test, this study investigated the bond strength between a hybrid ceramic and the extrinsic characterization layer after different ceramic surface treatments.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Hybrid ceramic blocks (Vita Enamic, Vita Zahnfabrik) were sectioned and randomly divided into 4 groups (N = 120) according to the surface treatment and aging (n = 15): P: polishing; E: acid etching with HF; A: aluminum oxide blasting; S: self-etching ceramic primer. The specimens were silanized, then cylinders of light-curing characterization material (Vita Enamic Stain, 1.6 mm diameter x 2 mm height) were fabricated, followed by glazing. The specimens were subsequently immersed in distilled water for 24 h and subjected to the µSBS test using a universal testing machine (load cell 0.5 mm/min, 50 kgf) or tested after thermocycling for 10,000 cycles in water (5°C-55°C). After treatment, the specimen surfaces were analyzed using SEM, with failure types defined as adhesive, predominantly adhesive, or cohesive. The data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most frequent failure type was predominantly adhesive between ceramic and the characterization layer. There were statistically significant differences between the surface treatments (p < 0.05). Thermocycling did not lead to statistically signifcant different results (p > 0.05). For groups P and A, a sharp decrease in SBS was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The absence of surface treatment drastically reduced the microshear bond strength between the ceramic and the characterization layer. Conditioning with 5% hydrofluoric acid for 60 s is the most suitable treatment for adhesion of the characterization layer to hybrid ceramic.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"23 5","pages":"429-435"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b2000235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Purpose: Using the microshear bond strength (µSBS) test, this study investigated the bond strength between a hybrid ceramic and the extrinsic characterization layer after different ceramic surface treatments.

Materials and methods: Hybrid ceramic blocks (Vita Enamic, Vita Zahnfabrik) were sectioned and randomly divided into 4 groups (N = 120) according to the surface treatment and aging (n = 15): P: polishing; E: acid etching with HF; A: aluminum oxide blasting; S: self-etching ceramic primer. The specimens were silanized, then cylinders of light-curing characterization material (Vita Enamic Stain, 1.6 mm diameter x 2 mm height) were fabricated, followed by glazing. The specimens were subsequently immersed in distilled water for 24 h and subjected to the µSBS test using a universal testing machine (load cell 0.5 mm/min, 50 kgf) or tested after thermocycling for 10,000 cycles in water (5°C-55°C). After treatment, the specimen surfaces were analyzed using SEM, with failure types defined as adhesive, predominantly adhesive, or cohesive. The data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (p < 0.05).

Results: The most frequent failure type was predominantly adhesive between ceramic and the characterization layer. There were statistically significant differences between the surface treatments (p < 0.05). Thermocycling did not lead to statistically signifcant different results (p > 0.05). For groups P and A, a sharp decrease in SBS was observed.

Conclusion: The absence of surface treatment drastically reduced the microshear bond strength between the ceramic and the characterization layer. Conditioning with 5% hydrofluoric acid for 60 s is the most suitable treatment for adhesion of the characterization layer to hybrid ceramic.

不同表面处理对杂化陶瓷表征层结合强度的影响。
目的:采用微剪切键合强度(µSBS)测试,研究不同表面处理方式下杂化陶瓷与外源表征层之间的键合强度。材料与方法:将混合陶瓷块(Vita Enamic, Vita Zahnfabrik)按表面处理和时效程度随机分为4组(N = 120) (N = 15): P:抛光;E: HF酸蚀;A:氧化铝爆破;S:自腐蚀陶瓷底漆。将样品进行硅化处理,然后制作光固化表征材料圆柱体(Vita Enamic Stain,直径1.6 mm x 2 mm高),然后上釉。随后将样品浸泡在蒸馏水中24 h,并使用通用试验机(0.5 mm/min, 50 kgf)进行µSBS测试,或在水中(5°C-55°C)进行10,000次热循环测试。处理后,用扫描电镜对试样表面进行分析,失效类型定义为粘接、主要粘接或粘接。采用双因素方差分析,并进行Tukey检验(p < 0.05)。结果:最常见的失效类型主要是陶瓷与表征层之间的粘接。表面处理间差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。热循环组差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。P组和A组SBS急剧下降。结论:表面处理的缺失大大降低了陶瓷与表征层之间的微剪切结合强度。用5%氢氟酸调理60 s是表征层与杂化陶瓷粘附最合适的处理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信