Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 1: Origins of the conflict.

IF 0.7 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Claire D Johnson, Bart N Green
{"title":"Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 1: Origins of the conflict.","authors":"Claire D Johnson,&nbsp;Bart N Green","doi":"10.7899/JCE-21-22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper is the first in a series that explores the historical events surrounding the Wilk v American Medical Association (AMA) lawsuit in which the plaintiffs argued that the AMA, the American Hospital Association, and other medical specialty societies violated antitrust law by restraining chiropractors' business practices. The purpose of this paper is to provide a brief review of the history of the AMA and the origins of chiropractic and to explore how the AMA began its monopoly of health care in the United States, possible reasons that organized medicine acted against chiropractic, and how these events influenced the chiropractic profession.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This historical research study used a phenomenological approach to qualitative inquiry into the conflict between regular medicine and chiropractic and the events before, during, and after a legal dispute at the time of modernization of the chiropractic profession. We used primary and secondary data sources. The final narrative recount was developed into 8 papers that follow a successive time line. This paper is the first of the series and explores the origins of the aversion of organized American medicine to other health professions and the origins of the chiropractic profession.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AMA began in the mid-1800s to unify like-minded \"regular\" medical physicians who developed a code of ethics and promoted higher educational standards. Their efforts to unify had excluded other types of health care providers, which they called \"irregular\" practitioners. However, Americans were seeking more natural alternatives to the harsh methods that regular medical physicians offered at that time. Nearly 50 years after the AMA began, the chiropractic profession attempted to emerge during a time when many patients valued vitalism and their freedom to choose what health care provider they would access.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During the years that chiropractic developed as a healing profession, organized medicine was already well established and developing a monopoly in American health care. These events created the foundation on which the tensions between these professions were built and ultimately resulted in the Wilk v AMA lawsuit.</p>","PeriodicalId":44516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","volume":"35 S1","pages":"9-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8493520/pdf/i2374-250X-35-S1-9.pdf","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-21-22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Objective: This paper is the first in a series that explores the historical events surrounding the Wilk v American Medical Association (AMA) lawsuit in which the plaintiffs argued that the AMA, the American Hospital Association, and other medical specialty societies violated antitrust law by restraining chiropractors' business practices. The purpose of this paper is to provide a brief review of the history of the AMA and the origins of chiropractic and to explore how the AMA began its monopoly of health care in the United States, possible reasons that organized medicine acted against chiropractic, and how these events influenced the chiropractic profession.

Methods: This historical research study used a phenomenological approach to qualitative inquiry into the conflict between regular medicine and chiropractic and the events before, during, and after a legal dispute at the time of modernization of the chiropractic profession. We used primary and secondary data sources. The final narrative recount was developed into 8 papers that follow a successive time line. This paper is the first of the series and explores the origins of the aversion of organized American medicine to other health professions and the origins of the chiropractic profession.

Results: The AMA began in the mid-1800s to unify like-minded "regular" medical physicians who developed a code of ethics and promoted higher educational standards. Their efforts to unify had excluded other types of health care providers, which they called "irregular" practitioners. However, Americans were seeking more natural alternatives to the harsh methods that regular medical physicians offered at that time. Nearly 50 years after the AMA began, the chiropractic profession attempted to emerge during a time when many patients valued vitalism and their freedom to choose what health care provider they would access.

Conclusion: During the years that chiropractic developed as a healing profession, organized medicine was already well established and developing a monopoly in American health care. These events created the foundation on which the tensions between these professions were built and ultimately resulted in the Wilk v AMA lawsuit.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

回顾改变脊椎指压治疗行业的诉讼第一部分:冲突的起源。
目的:本文是围绕Wilk诉美国医学协会(AMA)诉讼的历史事件系列文章中的第一篇,在该诉讼中,原告辩称美国医学协会、美国医院协会和其他医学专业协会限制脊医的商业行为违反了反垄断法。本文的目的是简要回顾美国医学协会的历史和脊骨医学的起源,并探讨美国医学协会是如何开始在美国垄断医疗保健的,组织医学反对脊骨医学可能的原因,以及这些事件如何影响脊骨医学专业。方法:这项历史研究采用现象学方法,对常规医学和脊骨医学之间的冲突以及脊骨医学专业现代化时期法律纠纷之前、期间和之后的事件进行了定性调查。我们使用了主数据源和辅助数据源。最后的叙述性叙述被发展成8篇论文,遵循连续的时间线。本文是该系列的第一篇,探讨了有组织的美国医学对其他健康专业的厌恶的起源以及脊骨医学专业的起源。结果:美国医学协会始于19世纪中期,旨在团结志同道合的“普通”医生,他们制定了道德准则并提高了教育标准。他们统一的努力将其他类型的医疗保健提供者排除在外,他们称之为“非正规”从业者。然而,美国人正在寻求更自然的替代品,以取代当时普通医生提供的苛刻方法。在美国医学协会成立近50年后,脊骨医学专业试图在许多患者重视生命体征和选择医疗服务提供者的自由的时期出现。结论:在脊骨神经医学作为一种治疗专业发展的这些年里,有组织的医学已经很好地建立起来,并在美国的医疗保健中形成了垄断地位。这些事件为这些职业之间的紧张关系奠定了基础,并最终导致了Wilk诉AMA的诉讼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chiropractic Education
Journal of Chiropractic Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
37.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chiropractic Education is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing research and scholarly articles pertaining to education theory, pedagogy, methodologies, practice, and other content relevant to the health professions academe. Journal contents are of interest to teachers, researchers, clinical educators, administrators, and students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信