Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 3: Chiropractic growth.

IF 0.7 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Claire D Johnson, Bart N Green
{"title":"Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 3: Chiropractic growth.","authors":"Claire D Johnson,&nbsp;Bart N Green","doi":"10.7899/JCE-21-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This is the third paper in a series that explores the historical events surrounding the Wilk v American Medical Association (AMA) lawsuit in which the plaintiffs argued that the AMA, the American Hospital Association, and other medical specialty societies violated antitrust law by restraining chiropractors' business practices. The purpose of this paper is to provide a brief review of the history of the growth of chiropractic, its public relations campaigns, and infighting that contributed to the events surrounding the Wilk v AMA lawsuit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This historical research study used a phenomenological approach to qualitative inquiry into the conflict between regular medicine and chiropractic and the events before, during, and after a legal dispute at the time of modernization of the chiropractic profession. Our methods included obtaining primary and secondary data sources. The final narrative recount was developed into 8 papers following a successive timeline. This paper is the third of the series that explores the growth the chiropractic profession.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By the 1930s, the AMA was already under investigation for violation of antitrust laws and the National Chiropractic Association was suggesting that the AMA was establishing a health care monopoly. Chiropractic schools grew and the number of graduates rose quickly. Public relations campaigns and publications in the popular press attempted to educate the public about chiropractic. Factions within the profession polarized around differing views of how they thought that chiropractic should be practiced and portrayed to the public. The AMA leaders noted the infighting and used it to their advantage to subvert chiropractic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Chiropractic grew rapidly and established its presence with the American public through public relations campaigns and popular press. However, infighting would give the AMA material to further its efforts to contain and eliminate the chiropractic profession.</p>","PeriodicalId":44516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","volume":"35 S1","pages":"45-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8493526/pdf/i2374-250X-35-S1-45.pdf","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-21-24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Objective: This is the third paper in a series that explores the historical events surrounding the Wilk v American Medical Association (AMA) lawsuit in which the plaintiffs argued that the AMA, the American Hospital Association, and other medical specialty societies violated antitrust law by restraining chiropractors' business practices. The purpose of this paper is to provide a brief review of the history of the growth of chiropractic, its public relations campaigns, and infighting that contributed to the events surrounding the Wilk v AMA lawsuit.

Methods: This historical research study used a phenomenological approach to qualitative inquiry into the conflict between regular medicine and chiropractic and the events before, during, and after a legal dispute at the time of modernization of the chiropractic profession. Our methods included obtaining primary and secondary data sources. The final narrative recount was developed into 8 papers following a successive timeline. This paper is the third of the series that explores the growth the chiropractic profession.

Results: By the 1930s, the AMA was already under investigation for violation of antitrust laws and the National Chiropractic Association was suggesting that the AMA was establishing a health care monopoly. Chiropractic schools grew and the number of graduates rose quickly. Public relations campaigns and publications in the popular press attempted to educate the public about chiropractic. Factions within the profession polarized around differing views of how they thought that chiropractic should be practiced and portrayed to the public. The AMA leaders noted the infighting and used it to their advantage to subvert chiropractic.

Conclusion: Chiropractic grew rapidly and established its presence with the American public through public relations campaigns and popular press. However, infighting would give the AMA material to further its efforts to contain and eliminate the chiropractic profession.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

回顾改变脊椎指压治疗行业的诉讼,第三部分:脊椎指压治疗的发展。
目的:这是探讨围绕威尔克诉美国医学协会(AMA)诉讼的历史事件的系列文章中的第三篇,在该诉讼中,原告认为AMA、美国医院协会和其他医学专业协会违反了反垄断法,限制了脊医的商业行为。本文的目的是简要回顾脊骨疗法的发展历史,它的公共关系运动,以及促成威尔克诉美国医学协会诉讼事件的内讧。方法:本历史研究采用现象学方法定性探究常规医学与脊椎指压疗法之间的冲突,以及在脊椎指压专业现代化时期发生法律纠纷之前、期间和之后发生的事件。我们的方法包括获得第一手和第二手数据来源。最后的叙述叙述按照一个连续的时间轴发展成8篇论文。本文是探讨脊椎指压治疗专业发展的系列文章的第三篇。结果:到20世纪30年代,美国医学协会已经因违反反垄断法而受到调查,全国脊椎按摩协会暗示美国医学协会正在建立医疗保健垄断。脊医学校不断增加,毕业生人数迅速增加。大众媒体的公共关系活动和出版物试图教育公众有关脊椎指压疗法的知识。这个行业内部的派系围绕着他们认为脊椎指压疗法应该如何实践和向公众描述的不同观点而分化。美国医学协会的领导人注意到这种内斗,并利用它来颠覆脊椎指压疗法。结论:脊椎指压疗法发展迅速,并通过公关活动和大众媒体在美国公众中建立了自己的地位。然而,内斗将给美国医学协会提供进一步努力遏制和消除脊椎指压治疗职业的材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chiropractic Education
Journal of Chiropractic Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
37.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chiropractic Education is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing research and scholarly articles pertaining to education theory, pedagogy, methodologies, practice, and other content relevant to the health professions academe. Journal contents are of interest to teachers, researchers, clinical educators, administrators, and students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信