Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 8: Judgment impact.

IF 0.7 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Claire D Johnson, Bart N Green
{"title":"Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 8: Judgment impact.","authors":"Claire D Johnson,&nbsp;Bart N Green","doi":"10.7899/JCE-21-29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper is the eighth in a series that explores the historical events surrounding the Wilk v American Medical Association (AMA) lawsuit in which the plaintiffs argued that the AMA, the American Hospital Association, and other medical specialty societies violated antitrust law by restraining chiropractors' business practices. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the possible impact that the final decision in favor of the plaintiffs may have had on the chiropractic profession.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This historical research study used a phenomenological approach to qualitative inquiry into the conflict between regular medicine and chiropractic and the events before, during, and after a legal dispute at the time of modernization of the chiropractic profession. Our methods included obtaining primary and secondary data sources. The final narrative recount was developed into 8 papers following a successive timeline. This paper is the eighth of the series that discusses how the trial decision may have influenced the chiropractic that we know today in the United States.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Chiropractic practice, education, and research have changed since before the lawsuit was filed. There are several areas in which we propose that the trial decision may have had an impact on the chiropractic profession.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The lawsuit removed the barriers that were implemented by organized medicine against the chiropractic profession. The quality of chiropractic practice, education, and research continues to improve and the profession continues to meet its most fundamental mission: to improve the lives of patients. Chiropractors practicing in the United States today are allowed to collaborate freely with other health professionals. Today, patients have the option to access chiropractic care because of the dedicated efforts of many people to reduce the previous barriers. It is up to the present-day members of the medical and chiropractic professions to look back and to remember what happened. By recalling the events surrounding the lawsuit, we may have a better understanding about our professions today. This information may help to facilitate interactions between medicine and chiropractic and to develop more respectful partnerships focused on creating a better future for the health of the public. The future of the chiropractic profession rests in the heads, hearts, and hands of its current members to do what is right.</p>","PeriodicalId":44516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","volume":"35 S1","pages":"117-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8493530/pdf/i2374-250X-35-S1-117.pdf","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-21-29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Objective: This paper is the eighth in a series that explores the historical events surrounding the Wilk v American Medical Association (AMA) lawsuit in which the plaintiffs argued that the AMA, the American Hospital Association, and other medical specialty societies violated antitrust law by restraining chiropractors' business practices. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the possible impact that the final decision in favor of the plaintiffs may have had on the chiropractic profession.

Methods: This historical research study used a phenomenological approach to qualitative inquiry into the conflict between regular medicine and chiropractic and the events before, during, and after a legal dispute at the time of modernization of the chiropractic profession. Our methods included obtaining primary and secondary data sources. The final narrative recount was developed into 8 papers following a successive timeline. This paper is the eighth of the series that discusses how the trial decision may have influenced the chiropractic that we know today in the United States.

Results: Chiropractic practice, education, and research have changed since before the lawsuit was filed. There are several areas in which we propose that the trial decision may have had an impact on the chiropractic profession.

Conclusion: The lawsuit removed the barriers that were implemented by organized medicine against the chiropractic profession. The quality of chiropractic practice, education, and research continues to improve and the profession continues to meet its most fundamental mission: to improve the lives of patients. Chiropractors practicing in the United States today are allowed to collaborate freely with other health professionals. Today, patients have the option to access chiropractic care because of the dedicated efforts of many people to reduce the previous barriers. It is up to the present-day members of the medical and chiropractic professions to look back and to remember what happened. By recalling the events surrounding the lawsuit, we may have a better understanding about our professions today. This information may help to facilitate interactions between medicine and chiropractic and to develop more respectful partnerships focused on creating a better future for the health of the public. The future of the chiropractic profession rests in the heads, hearts, and hands of its current members to do what is right.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

回顾改变脊椎指压治疗行业的诉讼第8部分:判决影响。
目的:本文是围绕Wilk诉美国医学协会(AMA)诉讼的历史事件系列的第八篇,在该诉讼中,原告辩称美国医学协会、美国医院协会和其他医学专业协会限制脊医的商业行为违反了反垄断法。本文的目的是讨论有利于原告的最终裁决可能对脊骨医学专业产生的影响。方法:这项历史研究采用现象学方法,对常规医学和脊骨医学之间的冲突以及脊骨医学专业现代化时期法律纠纷之前、期间和之后的事件进行了定性调查。我们的方法包括获取主要和次要数据源。最后的叙述性叙述按照连续的时间线发展成8篇论文。本文是讨论审判决定如何影响我们今天在美国所知的脊骨神经医学的系列文章的第八篇。结果:自提起诉讼之前,脊医的实践、教育和研究都发生了变化。我们认为,试验决定可能在几个领域对脊骨神经医学专业产生了影响。结论:该诉讼消除了有组织医学对脊骨神经医学专业实施的障碍。脊骨神经医学实践、教育和研究的质量不断提高,该行业继续履行其最基本的使命:改善患者的生活。如今,在美国执业的脊医可以自由地与其他卫生专业人员合作。如今,由于许多人致力于减少以前的障碍,患者可以选择接受脊骨神经医学治疗。现在的医学和脊骨神经医学专业的成员应该回顾并记住发生了什么。通过回忆围绕这起诉讼发生的事件,我们可能会更好地了解我们今天的职业。这些信息可能有助于促进医学和脊骨神经医学之间的互动,并发展更加尊重的伙伴关系,重点是为公众健康创造更美好的未来。脊骨医学专业的未来取决于其现有成员的头脑、心灵和双手,以做正确的事情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chiropractic Education
Journal of Chiropractic Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
37.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chiropractic Education is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing research and scholarly articles pertaining to education theory, pedagogy, methodologies, practice, and other content relevant to the health professions academe. Journal contents are of interest to teachers, researchers, clinical educators, administrators, and students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信