Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) for shoulder dislocations and reductions in the emergency department: a diagnostic randomised control trial (RCT).

Emergency medicine journal : EMJ Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-20 DOI:10.1136/emermed-2020-210947
Mark Anthony Attard Biancardi, Robert David Jarman, Tania Cardona
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) for shoulder dislocations and reductions in the emergency department: a diagnostic randomised control trial (RCT).","authors":"Mark Anthony Attard Biancardi,&nbsp;Robert David Jarman,&nbsp;Tania Cardona","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2020-210947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Following blunt trauma, diagnosis of shoulder dislocation based on physical examination alone is difficult due to possible concurrent proximal humeral fractures. X-rays are therefore used to confirm diagnosis. Results from recent observational studies comparing diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) with X-rays for shoulder dislocation have been encouraging. The aim of this study was to determine whether PoCUS improves diagnostic accuracy when used with physical examination for the diagnosis of shoulder dislocation, proximal humeral fracture and ascertaining successful reduction in the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, single-centre, open, parallel randomised control study over a 6-month period was used to answer the research question and test the null hypothesis. Consecutive eligible adult patients attending the ED of Mater Dei Hospital in Malta were randomised to either the control (C) (physical examination only) or experimental group (E) (physical examination and a two-point PoCUS scan). The study objectives were to measure diagnostic accuracy for both examinations for detecting shoulder dislocation, any associated proximal humeral fractures and confirming reduction. X-rays were used as reference standard for both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1206 patients were enrolled in this study (C n=600, E n=606). 290 dislocations (C n=132 and E n=158), 332 proximal humeral fractures (C n=154 and E n=178) and 278 reductions (C n=130 and E n=148) were analysed. A statistically significant difference (p<0.001) was found between the two groups for diagnostic accuracy in shoulder dislocation (C=65%, likelihood ratio (LR)+=2.03 and LR-=0.35 and E=100%, LR+=∞ and LR-=0), proximal humeral fractures (C=45.7%, LR+=1.23 and LR-=0.52 and E=98.3%, LR+=103.9 and LR-=0.03) and reduction (C=68.7%, E=100%). The null hypothesis for this study was thus rejected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The addition of PoCUS to a physical examination significantly improves diagnostic accuracy for dislocations, proximal humeral fractures and reduction confirmation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number Registry (ISRCTN17048126).</p>","PeriodicalId":410922,"journal":{"name":"Emergency medicine journal : EMJ","volume":" ","pages":"655-661"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency medicine journal : EMJ","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-210947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Following blunt trauma, diagnosis of shoulder dislocation based on physical examination alone is difficult due to possible concurrent proximal humeral fractures. X-rays are therefore used to confirm diagnosis. Results from recent observational studies comparing diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) with X-rays for shoulder dislocation have been encouraging. The aim of this study was to determine whether PoCUS improves diagnostic accuracy when used with physical examination for the diagnosis of shoulder dislocation, proximal humeral fracture and ascertaining successful reduction in the ED.

Methods: A prospective, single-centre, open, parallel randomised control study over a 6-month period was used to answer the research question and test the null hypothesis. Consecutive eligible adult patients attending the ED of Mater Dei Hospital in Malta were randomised to either the control (C) (physical examination only) or experimental group (E) (physical examination and a two-point PoCUS scan). The study objectives were to measure diagnostic accuracy for both examinations for detecting shoulder dislocation, any associated proximal humeral fractures and confirming reduction. X-rays were used as reference standard for both groups.

Results: 1206 patients were enrolled in this study (C n=600, E n=606). 290 dislocations (C n=132 and E n=158), 332 proximal humeral fractures (C n=154 and E n=178) and 278 reductions (C n=130 and E n=148) were analysed. A statistically significant difference (p<0.001) was found between the two groups for diagnostic accuracy in shoulder dislocation (C=65%, likelihood ratio (LR)+=2.03 and LR-=0.35 and E=100%, LR+=∞ and LR-=0), proximal humeral fractures (C=45.7%, LR+=1.23 and LR-=0.52 and E=98.3%, LR+=103.9 and LR-=0.03) and reduction (C=68.7%, E=100%). The null hypothesis for this study was thus rejected.

Conclusions: The addition of PoCUS to a physical examination significantly improves diagnostic accuracy for dislocations, proximal humeral fractures and reduction confirmation.

Trial registration number: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number Registry (ISRCTN17048126).

急诊部即时超声(PoCUS)诊断肩关节脱位和复位的准确性:一项诊断性随机对照试验(RCT)
背景:钝性创伤后,由于可能并发肱骨近端骨折,仅凭体格检查诊断肩关节脱位是困难的。因此,x光被用来确认诊断。最近的观察性研究比较了护理点超声(PoCUS)和x射线对肩关节脱位的诊断准确性,结果令人鼓舞。本研究的目的是确定PoCUS与体格检查一起用于诊断肩关节脱位、肱骨近端骨折和确定ed复位成功时是否能提高诊断准确性。方法:一项前瞻性、单中心、开放、平行随机对照研究,为期6个月,用于回答研究问题并检验原假设。连续在马耳他Mater Dei医院急诊科就诊的符合条件的成年患者被随机分为对照组(C)(仅进行体格检查)或实验组(E)(体格检查和两点PoCUS扫描)。研究的目的是测量检测肩部脱位、任何相关肱骨近端骨折和确认复位的两种检查的诊断准确性。两组均以x射线作为参考标准。结果:1206例患者入组(C n=600, E n=606)。分析了290例脱位(C n=132, E n=158), 332例肱骨近端骨折(C n=154, E n=178)和278例复位(C n=130, E n=148)。结论:在体格检查中加入PoCUS可显著提高脱位、肱骨近端骨折和复位确认的诊断准确性。试验注册号:国际标准随机对照试验注册号(ISRCTN17048126)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信