[Quality of care for patients with atopic dermatitis in Germany-no improvements in indicators after ten years].

4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Hautarzt Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-20 DOI:10.1007/s00105-021-04885-3
A Langenbruch, N Mohr, F Abeck, J Schmitt, S Ständer, T Werfel, D Thaçi, S Weidinger, M Augustin
{"title":"[Quality of care for patients with atopic dermatitis in Germany-no improvements in indicators after ten years].","authors":"A Langenbruch,&nbsp;N Mohr,&nbsp;F Abeck,&nbsp;J Schmitt,&nbsp;S Ständer,&nbsp;T Werfel,&nbsp;D Thaçi,&nbsp;S Weidinger,&nbsp;M Augustin","doi":"10.1007/s00105-021-04885-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With AtopicHealth1, the first national care study on atopic dermatitis (AD) was conducted in 2010. At that time, about one third of the patients undergoing treatment by dermatologists showed severe limitations in quality of life, which indicated an insufficient quality of care. The aim of the present study was to characterise the current care of patients with AD undergoing dermatological treatment in comparison between different severity grades, as well as in comparison to 2010 and to psoriasis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Germany-wide multicentre cross-sectional study \"AtopicHealth2\" recorded clinical data, quality of life (DLQI), therapies, preventive behaviour and patient-defined treatment benefit (PBI). Patients with an indication for systemic therapy were considered moderately to severely affected for subgroup analyses, the others mildly affected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2017 and 2019, 1291 patients (median age 41 years, 56.5% female) were enrolled by 111 centres. Compared with 2010, there were no improvements in quality of life (DLQI 8.5 in both studies), severity (SCORAD 45.4 vs. 42.3 in 2010) or treatment benefit (PBI 2.2 vs. 2.4 in 2010). Moderately to severely affected patients were more likely to show impaired quality of life (45.4% vs. 23.6%) and less likely to have relevant treatment benefits (PBI < 1: 21.3% vs. 13.2%) than mildly affected patients. In contrast to psoriasis, patients with AD revealed higher quality of life limitations (DLQI 8.5 vs. 6.1) and lower treatment benefit (PBI 2.2 vs. 2.8).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Compared to 2010, there is no improvement in the quality of care for AD in Germany. Compared to psoriasis, patients with AD show higher burden and lower treatment benefit, which underlines the need for therapeutic innovations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12970,"journal":{"name":"Hautarzt","volume":"72 12","pages":"1079-1089"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8613161/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hautarzt","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-021-04885-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: With AtopicHealth1, the first national care study on atopic dermatitis (AD) was conducted in 2010. At that time, about one third of the patients undergoing treatment by dermatologists showed severe limitations in quality of life, which indicated an insufficient quality of care. The aim of the present study was to characterise the current care of patients with AD undergoing dermatological treatment in comparison between different severity grades, as well as in comparison to 2010 and to psoriasis.

Methods: The Germany-wide multicentre cross-sectional study "AtopicHealth2" recorded clinical data, quality of life (DLQI), therapies, preventive behaviour and patient-defined treatment benefit (PBI). Patients with an indication for systemic therapy were considered moderately to severely affected for subgroup analyses, the others mildly affected.

Results: Between 2017 and 2019, 1291 patients (median age 41 years, 56.5% female) were enrolled by 111 centres. Compared with 2010, there were no improvements in quality of life (DLQI 8.5 in both studies), severity (SCORAD 45.4 vs. 42.3 in 2010) or treatment benefit (PBI 2.2 vs. 2.4 in 2010). Moderately to severely affected patients were more likely to show impaired quality of life (45.4% vs. 23.6%) and less likely to have relevant treatment benefits (PBI < 1: 21.3% vs. 13.2%) than mildly affected patients. In contrast to psoriasis, patients with AD revealed higher quality of life limitations (DLQI 8.5 vs. 6.1) and lower treatment benefit (PBI 2.2 vs. 2.8).

Discussion: Compared to 2010, there is no improvement in the quality of care for AD in Germany. Compared to psoriasis, patients with AD show higher burden and lower treatment benefit, which underlines the need for therapeutic innovations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

【德国特应性皮炎患者的护理质量——十年后各项指标没有改善】。
背景:2010年,通过AtopicHealth1开展了第一个针对特应性皮炎(AD)的全国性护理研究。当时,大约三分之一接受皮肤科医生治疗的患者在生活质量方面表现出严重的限制,这表明护理质量不足。本研究的目的是通过比较不同严重程度的AD患者接受皮肤科治疗的现状,并与2010年和牛皮癣患者进行比较。方法:德国多中心横断面研究“AtopicHealth2”记录了临床数据、生活质量(DLQI)、治疗方法、预防行为和患者定义的治疗获益(PBI)。在亚组分析中,有全身性治疗指征的患者被认为是中度至重度感染,其他患者被认为是轻度感染。结果:2017年至2019年,111个中心共纳入1291例患者(中位年龄41岁,56.5%为女性)。与2010年相比,在生活质量(两项研究中DLQI均为8.5)、严重程度(SCORAD为45.4,2010年为42.3)或治疗获益(PBI为2.2,2010年为2.4)方面均无改善。中度至重度受影响的患者更有可能表现出生活质量受损(45.4%对23.6%),而获得相关治疗益处的可能性更小(PBI讨论:与2010年相比,德国AD的护理质量没有改善。与牛皮癣相比,AD患者的负担更高,治疗效果更低,这凸显了治疗创新的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hautarzt
Hautarzt 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
93
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Hautarzt is an internationally recognized journal informing all dermatologists working in practical or clinical environments about important developments in the field of dermatology including allergology, venereology and related areas. Comprehensive reviews on a specific topical issue focus on providing evidenced based information on diagnostics and therapy. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Case reports feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Review articles under the rubric "Continuing Medical Education" present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信