Ambulance service call handler and clinician identification of stroke in North East Ambulance Service.

Graham McClelland, Emma Burrow
{"title":"Ambulance service call handler and clinician identification of stroke in North East Ambulance Service.","authors":"Graham McClelland,&nbsp;Emma Burrow","doi":"10.29045/14784726.2021.09.6.2.59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Emergency medical services (EMS) are the first point of contact for most acute stroke patients. The EMS response is triggered by ambulance call handlers who triage calls and then an appropriate response is allocated. Early recognition of stroke is vital to minimise the call to hospital time as the availability and effectiveness of reperfusion therapies are time dependent. Minimising the pre-hospital phase by accurate call handler stroke identification, short EMS on-scene times and rapid access to specialist stroke care is vital. The aims of this study were to evaluate stroke identification by call handlers and clinicians in North East Ambulance Service (NEAS) and report on-scene times for suspected stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective service evaluation was conducted linking routinely collected data between 1 and 30 November 2019 from three sources: NEAS Emergency Operations Centre; NEAS clinicians; and hospital stroke diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The datasets were linked resulting in 2214 individual cases. Call handler identification of acute stroke was 51.5% (95% CI 45.3-57.8) sensitive with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 12.8% (95% CI 11.4-14.4). Face-to-face clinician identification of stroke was 76.1% (95% CI 70.4-81.1) sensitive with a PPV of 27.4% (95% CI 25.3-29.7). The median on-scene time was 33 (IQR 25-43) minutes, with call handler and clinician identification of stroke resulting in shorter times.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This service evaluation using ambulance data linked with national audit data showed that the sensitivity of NEAS call handler and clinician identification of stroke are similar to figures published on other systems but the PPV of call handler and clinician identification stroke could be improved. However, sensitivity is paramount while timely identification of suspected stroke patients and rapid transport to definitive care are the primary functions of EMS. Call handler identification of stroke appears to affect the time that clinicians spend at scene with suspected stroke patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":72470,"journal":{"name":"British paramedic journal","volume":"6 2","pages":"59-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8415208/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British paramedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2021.09.6.2.59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Introduction: Emergency medical services (EMS) are the first point of contact for most acute stroke patients. The EMS response is triggered by ambulance call handlers who triage calls and then an appropriate response is allocated. Early recognition of stroke is vital to minimise the call to hospital time as the availability and effectiveness of reperfusion therapies are time dependent. Minimising the pre-hospital phase by accurate call handler stroke identification, short EMS on-scene times and rapid access to specialist stroke care is vital. The aims of this study were to evaluate stroke identification by call handlers and clinicians in North East Ambulance Service (NEAS) and report on-scene times for suspected stroke patients.

Methods: A retrospective service evaluation was conducted linking routinely collected data between 1 and 30 November 2019 from three sources: NEAS Emergency Operations Centre; NEAS clinicians; and hospital stroke diagnoses.

Results: The datasets were linked resulting in 2214 individual cases. Call handler identification of acute stroke was 51.5% (95% CI 45.3-57.8) sensitive with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 12.8% (95% CI 11.4-14.4). Face-to-face clinician identification of stroke was 76.1% (95% CI 70.4-81.1) sensitive with a PPV of 27.4% (95% CI 25.3-29.7). The median on-scene time was 33 (IQR 25-43) minutes, with call handler and clinician identification of stroke resulting in shorter times.

Conclusion: This service evaluation using ambulance data linked with national audit data showed that the sensitivity of NEAS call handler and clinician identification of stroke are similar to figures published on other systems but the PPV of call handler and clinician identification stroke could be improved. However, sensitivity is paramount while timely identification of suspected stroke patients and rapid transport to definitive care are the primary functions of EMS. Call handler identification of stroke appears to affect the time that clinicians spend at scene with suspected stroke patients.

Abstract Image

救护车服务呼叫处理和临床医生识别中风在东北救护车服务。
简介:紧急医疗服务(EMS)是大多数急性中风患者的第一接触点。EMS响应由救护车呼叫处理人员触发,他们对呼叫进行分类,然后分配适当的响应。由于再灌注治疗的可用性和有效性取决于时间,因此早期识别中风对于尽量减少住院时间至关重要。通过准确的呼叫处理程序中风识别,缩短EMS现场时间和快速获得专业中风护理来最大限度地减少院前阶段至关重要。本研究的目的是评估东北救护车服务中心(NEAS)呼叫处理人员和临床医生对中风的识别,并报告疑似中风患者的现场时间。方法:对2019年11月1日至30日期间从三个来源常规收集的数据进行回顾性服务评估:NEAS应急行动中心;近地小行星临床医师;医院中风诊断。结果:数据集被链接,导致2214例个体病例。呼叫处理人员识别急性卒中的敏感性为51.5% (95% CI 45.3-57.8),阳性预测值(PPV)为12.8% (95% CI 11.4-14.4)。面对面临床医生对卒中的识别敏感性为76.1% (95% CI 70.4-81.1), PPV为27.4% (95% CI 25.3-29.7)。中位现场时间为33分钟(IQR 25-43),呼叫处理人员和临床医生对中风的识别缩短了时间。结论:利用救护车数据与国家审计数据进行的服务评估表明,NEAS呼叫处理程序和临床医生识别中风的敏感性与其他系统上公布的数据相似,但呼叫处理程序和临床医生识别中风的PPV有待提高。然而,敏感性是至关重要的,而及时识别疑似卒中患者和快速运送到最终护理是EMS的主要功能。呼叫处理人员对中风的识别似乎会影响临床医生在疑似中风患者现场花费的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信