The Differences in Experiences Among Multi-Level Healthcare Leaders, Between the First and the Second Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Two Cross-Sectional Studies Compared.

IF 3.4 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Healthcare Leadership Pub Date : 2021-09-11 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JHL.S326019
Bibi Hølge-Hazelton, Line Zacho Borre, Mette Kjerholt, Brendan McCormack, Elizabeth Rosted
{"title":"The Differences in Experiences Among Multi-Level Healthcare Leaders, Between the First and the Second Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Two Cross-Sectional Studies Compared.","authors":"Bibi Hølge-Hazelton, Line Zacho Borre, Mette Kjerholt, Brendan McCormack, Elizabeth Rosted","doi":"10.2147/JHL.S326019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify the differences in experiences during wave I and II of the COVID-19 pandemic among healthcare leaders.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>It is expected, that working conditions for COVID-19-pandemic frontline staff will change, as health care organizations have gained experience with handling the consequences of the disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was sent out to Danish health care leaders during the first and the second pandemic wave. Comparative analyses were performed in relation to three key characteristics: management level, management education and experiences as a leader.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-nine health care leaders completed both surveys. Significant differences were found within the entire group across the key characteristics as they felt more prepared for each stage of the situation, they had more influence on the decisions taken, and they felt more concerned about the quality of treatment and care and their own health. Further significant results related to the three key characteristics were found at 1) Management level: The heads of department experienced being better informed, having more overview of their tasks and that these were meaningful. The ward managers experienced being more able to work in consistency with own beliefs and values, though they felt more overloaded. 2) Level of management education: Leaders, without a formal management education, experienced being more supported by staff. 3) Years of experiences as leader: Leaders with more than five years of experience, experienced being more prepared and informed, had more influence on decision-making, and were more worried about their own health.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The learning from experience that happens naturally in crisis situations is the reason why the leaders feel more prepared. However, there is a need for further leadership and practice development, to create contexts where leaders feel more ready for all aspects of their role.</p>","PeriodicalId":44346,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Leadership","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1b/eb/jhl-13-209.PMC8445098.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S326019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To identify the differences in experiences during wave I and II of the COVID-19 pandemic among healthcare leaders.

Background: It is expected, that working conditions for COVID-19-pandemic frontline staff will change, as health care organizations have gained experience with handling the consequences of the disease.

Methods: An online survey was sent out to Danish health care leaders during the first and the second pandemic wave. Comparative analyses were performed in relation to three key characteristics: management level, management education and experiences as a leader.

Results: Eighty-nine health care leaders completed both surveys. Significant differences were found within the entire group across the key characteristics as they felt more prepared for each stage of the situation, they had more influence on the decisions taken, and they felt more concerned about the quality of treatment and care and their own health. Further significant results related to the three key characteristics were found at 1) Management level: The heads of department experienced being better informed, having more overview of their tasks and that these were meaningful. The ward managers experienced being more able to work in consistency with own beliefs and values, though they felt more overloaded. 2) Level of management education: Leaders, without a formal management education, experienced being more supported by staff. 3) Years of experiences as leader: Leaders with more than five years of experience, experienced being more prepared and informed, had more influence on decision-making, and were more worried about their own health.

Conclusion: The learning from experience that happens naturally in crisis situations is the reason why the leaders feel more prepared. However, there is a need for further leadership and practice development, to create contexts where leaders feel more ready for all aspects of their role.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

COVID-19 大流行第一波和第二波期间多级医疗保健领导者的经历差异:两项横断面研究比较。
目的:确定医疗保健领导者在 COVID-19 大流行第一波和第二波期间的经验差异:背景:随着医疗机构在应对 COVID-19 大流行的后果方面积累了丰富的经验,预计一线员工的工作条件将会发生变化:方法:在第一波和第二波大流行期间,我们向丹麦医疗机构的领导者发送了一份在线调查。结果:89 位医疗机构领导填写了调查问卷:89 名医疗保健领导者完成了这两项调查。结果:89 名医疗保健领导者完成了这两项调查。在整个调查组中,他们在关键特征方面存在显著差异,因为他们认为自己对每个阶段的情况都做了更充分的准备,他们对所做的决定有更大的影响力,他们对治疗和护理的质量以及自己的健康更关心。与三个关键特征相关的其他重要结果体现在 1) 管理层面:科室负责人感到信息更灵通,对自己的任务有更全面的了解,而且这些任务很有意义。病房管理人员认为,尽管他们感到工作负担更重,但他们的工作更能与自己的信念和价值观保持一致。2) 管理教育水平:没有接受过正规管理教育的领导者更能得到员工的支持。3) 担任领导的年限:拥有五年以上工作经验的领导者更有准备,更了解情况,对决策有更大的影响力,也更担心自己的健康:结论:在危机情况下自然发生的经验学习是领导者感觉准备更充分的原因。然而,还需要进一步发展领导力和实践能力,以创造让领导者感觉在其角色的各个方面都做好了更充分准备的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Healthcare Leadership
Journal of Healthcare Leadership HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Efficient and successful modern healthcare depends on a growing group of professionals working together as an interdisciplinary team. However, many forces shape the delivery of healthcare; changes are being driven by the markets, transformations in concepts of health and wellbeing, technology and research and discovery. Dynamic leadership will guide these necessary transformations. The Journal of Healthcare Leadership is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on leadership for the healthcare professions. The publication strives to amalgamate current and future healthcare professionals and managers by providing key insights into leadership progress and challenges to improve patient care. The journal aspires to inform key decision makers and those professionals with ambitions of leadership and management; it seeks to connect professionals who are engaged in similar endeavours and to provide wisdom from those working in other industries. Senior and trainee doctors, nurses and allied healthcare professionals, medical students, healthcare managers and allied leaders are invited to contribute to this publication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信