Impaired psychological well-being of healthcare workers in a German department of anesthesiology is independent of immediate SARS-CoV-2 exposure - a longitudinal observational study.

Q1 Medicine
GMS German Medical Science Pub Date : 2021-09-01 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.3205/000298
Benedikt Schmid, Stefan M Schulz, Michael Schuler, Dennis Göpfert, Grit Hein, Peter Heuschmann, Thomas Wurmb, Paul Pauli, Patrick Meybohm, Heike L Rittner
{"title":"Impaired psychological well-being of healthcare workers in a German department of anesthesiology is independent of immediate SARS-CoV-2 exposure - a longitudinal observational study.","authors":"Benedikt Schmid,&nbsp;Stefan M Schulz,&nbsp;Michael Schuler,&nbsp;Dennis Göpfert,&nbsp;Grit Hein,&nbsp;Peter Heuschmann,&nbsp;Thomas Wurmb,&nbsp;Paul Pauli,&nbsp;Patrick Meybohm,&nbsp;Heike L Rittner","doi":"10.3205/000298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The study aimed to assess the mental well-being of healthcare professionals at a German department of anesthesiology and critical care with a specialized ICU for treatment of COVID-19 patients during the first two peaks of the 2020 pandemic, and identifying risk and protective factors. <b>Methods:</b> A single-center longitudinal, online-based survey was conducted in healthcare workers from a department of anesthesiology and critical care in Bavaria, the most affected federal state in Germany at the time of assessment. Validated scores for depression, anxiety, somatic disorders, burnout, resilience, and self-management were used and complemented by questions about perceived COVID-19-related stressors. In parallel, patient characteristics in the ICU were collected. <b>Results:</b> 24 and 23 critically ill COVID-19 patients were treated during both observation periods in April/May and November/December 2020, respectively. 87.5% and 78.2% of patients had moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. From March 6, 2020 onwards, the hospital had switched to a command and control-based hospital incident command system (HICS) and increased work forces. Point prevalence of depression-like symptoms (13.6% and 12.8%) and burnout (21.6% and 17.4%) in the department's healthcare professionals was high. Exposure to SARS-CoV-2 did not increase psychological burden. Consequences of the lockdown were rated as highly distressing by a majority of all ICU personnel. High self-reported trait resilience was protective against signs of depression, generalized anxiety, and burnout. <b>Conclusions:</b> During the pandemic, healthcare professionals have been suffering from increased psychological distress compared to reference data for both the general population and ICU personnel. General effects of the lockdown appear more relevant than actual COVID-19 patient contact. High trait resilience has a protective effect, yet vulnerable individuals may require specific support. Prevention against potential after effects of the lockdown, and in particular measures allowing to avoid another lockdown, appear warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":39243,"journal":{"name":"GMS German Medical Science","volume":"19 ","pages":"Doc11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8422798/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS German Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/000298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: The study aimed to assess the mental well-being of healthcare professionals at a German department of anesthesiology and critical care with a specialized ICU for treatment of COVID-19 patients during the first two peaks of the 2020 pandemic, and identifying risk and protective factors. Methods: A single-center longitudinal, online-based survey was conducted in healthcare workers from a department of anesthesiology and critical care in Bavaria, the most affected federal state in Germany at the time of assessment. Validated scores for depression, anxiety, somatic disorders, burnout, resilience, and self-management were used and complemented by questions about perceived COVID-19-related stressors. In parallel, patient characteristics in the ICU were collected. Results: 24 and 23 critically ill COVID-19 patients were treated during both observation periods in April/May and November/December 2020, respectively. 87.5% and 78.2% of patients had moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. From March 6, 2020 onwards, the hospital had switched to a command and control-based hospital incident command system (HICS) and increased work forces. Point prevalence of depression-like symptoms (13.6% and 12.8%) and burnout (21.6% and 17.4%) in the department's healthcare professionals was high. Exposure to SARS-CoV-2 did not increase psychological burden. Consequences of the lockdown were rated as highly distressing by a majority of all ICU personnel. High self-reported trait resilience was protective against signs of depression, generalized anxiety, and burnout. Conclusions: During the pandemic, healthcare professionals have been suffering from increased psychological distress compared to reference data for both the general population and ICU personnel. General effects of the lockdown appear more relevant than actual COVID-19 patient contact. High trait resilience has a protective effect, yet vulnerable individuals may require specific support. Prevention against potential after effects of the lockdown, and in particular measures allowing to avoid another lockdown, appear warranted.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一项纵向观察研究显示,德国麻醉科医护人员的心理健康受损与直接接触SARS-CoV-2无关。
背景:本研究旨在评估在2020年大流行的前两个高峰期间,德国一家专门治疗COVID-19患者的ICU麻醉和重症监护室医护人员的心理健康状况,并确定风险和保护因素。方法:对巴伐利亚州麻醉和重症监护室的医护人员进行了单中心纵向在线调查,巴伐利亚州是德国受影响最严重的联邦州。使用了抑郁、焦虑、躯体疾病、倦怠、恢复力和自我管理的验证分数,并辅以有关感知到的与covid -19相关的压力源的问题。同时,收集ICU患者的特征。结果:2020年4月/ 5月和11月/ 12月观察期共收治新冠肺炎危重患者24例和23例。87.5%和78.2%的患者存在中重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征。从2020年3月6日起,医院已转为以指挥和控制为基础的医院事故指挥系统(HICS),并增加了工作人员。该科医护人员抑郁样症状的点患病率(分别为13.6%和12.8%)和倦怠(分别为21.6%和17.4%)较高。暴露于SARS-CoV-2不会增加心理负担。大多数ICU工作人员认为封锁的后果非常令人痛苦。高自我报告的特质弹性对抑郁、广泛性焦虑和倦怠的迹象有保护作用。结论:在大流行期间,与普通人群和ICU人员的参考数据相比,卫生保健专业人员遭受的心理困扰增加。封锁的总体影响似乎比实际接触的COVID-19患者更相关。高特质弹性具有保护作用,但脆弱个体可能需要特定的支持。防范封锁的潜在后果,特别是采取措施避免再次封锁,似乎是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GMS German Medical Science
GMS German Medical Science Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书