Involuntary Psychiatric Hospitalization: How Patient Characteristics Affect Decision-Making.

The Psychiatric quarterly Pub Date : 2022-03-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-18 DOI:10.1007/s11126-021-09939-2
Ish P Bhalla, Keith Siegel, Monika Chaudhry, Ning Li, Sam Torbati, Teryl Nuckols, Itai Danovitch
{"title":"Involuntary Psychiatric Hospitalization: How Patient Characteristics Affect Decision-Making.","authors":"Ish P Bhalla,&nbsp;Keith Siegel,&nbsp;Monika Chaudhry,&nbsp;Ning Li,&nbsp;Sam Torbati,&nbsp;Teryl Nuckols,&nbsp;Itai Danovitch","doi":"10.1007/s11126-021-09939-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Emergency department (ED) psychiatrists face the consequential decision to pursue involuntary inpatient psychiatric admission. Research on the relationship between patient characteristics and the decision to pursue involuntary psychiatric admission is limited. Using data from 2017 to 2018 at an urban Los Angeles hospital, we used generalized linear mixed effects models to compare patients who were involuntarily admitted to inpatient psychiatry to patients who were discharged from the ED. Of 2,448 patients included in the study, 1,217 (49.7%) were involuntarily admitted to inpatient psychiatry and 1,231 (50.3%) were discharged. After controlling for sociodemographic characteristics, admitted patients were more likely to have been brought in by police, have had an organized suicide plan or recent attempt, physical signs of harm, psychosis, depression or hopelessness, lack social support, have diagnoses of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, and be administered injectable psychotropic medications. Stimulant use, a diagnosis of anxiety or developmental disorders, and recent medical ED utilization were associated with discharge. Psychiatrists pursued involuntarily psychiatric hospitalization based on factors potentially indicative of dangerousness, leaving patients, particularly those with recent substance use, without immediate access to treatment. Policies should focus on increasing follow up to high quality, voluntary outpatient mental health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":520814,"journal":{"name":"The Psychiatric quarterly","volume":" ","pages":"297-310"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Psychiatric quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-021-09939-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Emergency department (ED) psychiatrists face the consequential decision to pursue involuntary inpatient psychiatric admission. Research on the relationship between patient characteristics and the decision to pursue involuntary psychiatric admission is limited. Using data from 2017 to 2018 at an urban Los Angeles hospital, we used generalized linear mixed effects models to compare patients who were involuntarily admitted to inpatient psychiatry to patients who were discharged from the ED. Of 2,448 patients included in the study, 1,217 (49.7%) were involuntarily admitted to inpatient psychiatry and 1,231 (50.3%) were discharged. After controlling for sociodemographic characteristics, admitted patients were more likely to have been brought in by police, have had an organized suicide plan or recent attempt, physical signs of harm, psychosis, depression or hopelessness, lack social support, have diagnoses of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, and be administered injectable psychotropic medications. Stimulant use, a diagnosis of anxiety or developmental disorders, and recent medical ED utilization were associated with discharge. Psychiatrists pursued involuntarily psychiatric hospitalization based on factors potentially indicative of dangerousness, leaving patients, particularly those with recent substance use, without immediate access to treatment. Policies should focus on increasing follow up to high quality, voluntary outpatient mental health care.

非自愿精神病住院:患者特征如何影响决策。
急诊科(ED)精神科医生面临的后续决定,追求非自愿住院精神病住院。关于患者特征与非自愿精神病住院决定之间关系的研究是有限的。使用2017年至2018年洛杉矶一家城市医院的数据,我们使用广义线性混合效应模型来比较非自愿住院精神科的患者和从急诊科出院的患者。在纳入研究的2448名患者中,1217名(49.7%)非自愿住院精神科,1231名(50.3%)出院。在控制了社会人口学特征后,入院的病人更有可能是被警察带进来的,有有组织的自杀计划或最近的企图,身体上有伤害的迹象,精神病,抑郁或绝望,缺乏社会支持,被诊断为精神分裂症或双相情感障碍,并被注射精神药物。兴奋剂使用,焦虑或发育障碍的诊断,以及最近的医疗ED使用与出院有关。精神科医生根据潜在危险因素非自愿地进行精神科住院治疗,使患者,特别是那些最近使用药物的患者,无法立即获得治疗。政策应侧重于增加对高质量、自愿门诊精神卫生保健的后续行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信