Efficacy of the Combination of Indomethacin and Methocarbamol versus Indomethacin Alone in Patients with Acute Low Back Pain: A Double-Blind, Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

IF 0.8 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice Pub Date : 2021-08-03 eCollection Date: 2021-04-01 DOI:10.4103/jrpp.JRPP_21_31
Shiva Samsamshariat, Mehdi Sharifi-Sade, Shafeajafar Zoofaghari, Asieh Maghami Mehr, Ali Mohammad Sabzghabaee
{"title":"Efficacy of the Combination of Indomethacin and Methocarbamol versus Indomethacin Alone in Patients with Acute Low Back Pain: A Double-Blind, Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.","authors":"Shiva Samsamshariat,&nbsp;Mehdi Sharifi-Sade,&nbsp;Shafeajafar Zoofaghari,&nbsp;Asieh Maghami Mehr,&nbsp;Ali Mohammad Sabzghabaee","doi":"10.4103/jrpp.JRPP_21_31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Acute low back pain is a common ailment and causes pain and disability. Physicians often prescribe nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to treat acute low back pain; however, due attention has recently been drawn to muscle relaxants to reduce the severity of patients' daily physical dysfunction. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effect of the administration of indomethacin alone compared with methocarbamolas a muscle relaxant and indomethacin as an NSAID on the treatment of acute low back pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present double-blind clinical trial was performed on 64 patients with acute low back pain. The patients were categorized into two groups and received the treatments as follows. Indomethacin capsules of 25 mg every 8 h and placebo tablets every 8 h were administered in the first group (Group I). Indomethacin capsules of 25 mg every 8 h and methocarbamol tablets of 500 mg every 8 h were administered in the second group (Group I + M). Patient pain intensity and physical function based on Back Pain Function Scale (BPFS) were recorded before and 1 week after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The present study results revealed that the mean pain reduction of patients in Group I + M was significantly higher than that of Group I (3.66 ± 3.17 vs. 1.84 ± 1.53; <i>P</i> < 0.001). Moreover, the mean BPFS increase in Group I + M was significantly higher than that of Group I (19.44 ± 8.66 vs. 4.75 ± 4.35; <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the results of the present study, concomitant administration of indomethacin and methocarbamol can be more effective in reducing pain intensity and improving the patient's physical function (or performance).</p>","PeriodicalId":17158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","volume":"10 2","pages":"96-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ae/ae/JRPP-10-96.PMC8420930.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrpp.JRPP_21_31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Acute low back pain is a common ailment and causes pain and disability. Physicians often prescribe nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to treat acute low back pain; however, due attention has recently been drawn to muscle relaxants to reduce the severity of patients' daily physical dysfunction. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effect of the administration of indomethacin alone compared with methocarbamolas a muscle relaxant and indomethacin as an NSAID on the treatment of acute low back pain.

Methods: The present double-blind clinical trial was performed on 64 patients with acute low back pain. The patients were categorized into two groups and received the treatments as follows. Indomethacin capsules of 25 mg every 8 h and placebo tablets every 8 h were administered in the first group (Group I). Indomethacin capsules of 25 mg every 8 h and methocarbamol tablets of 500 mg every 8 h were administered in the second group (Group I + M). Patient pain intensity and physical function based on Back Pain Function Scale (BPFS) were recorded before and 1 week after the intervention.

Findings: The present study results revealed that the mean pain reduction of patients in Group I + M was significantly higher than that of Group I (3.66 ± 3.17 vs. 1.84 ± 1.53; P < 0.001). Moreover, the mean BPFS increase in Group I + M was significantly higher than that of Group I (19.44 ± 8.66 vs. 4.75 ± 4.35; P < 0.001).

Conclusion: According to the results of the present study, concomitant administration of indomethacin and methocarbamol can be more effective in reducing pain intensity and improving the patient's physical function (or performance).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

吲哚美辛联合甲氨基氨基酚与单用吲哚美辛治疗急性腰痛的疗效比较:一项双盲、随机安慰剂对照临床试验
目的:急性腰痛是一种常见的疾病,可引起疼痛和残疾。医生经常开非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)来治疗急性腰痛;然而,肌肉松弛剂最近引起了人们的注意,以减轻患者日常身体功能障碍的严重程度。因此,本研究旨在评价单独应用吲哚美辛与肌松剂甲氧甲氨酰胺及吲哚美辛作为非甾体抗炎药治疗急性腰痛的疗效。方法:对64例急性腰痛患者进行双盲临床试验。将患者分为两组,采用如下治疗方法。第一组(I组)给予吲哚美辛胶囊25 mg / 8 h,安慰剂片每8 h,第二组(I + M组)给予吲哚美辛胶囊25 mg / 8 h,甲氨氨基酚片500 mg / 8 h,分别于干预前和干预后1周记录患者疼痛强度和背部疼痛功能量表(BPFS)生理功能。结果:本研究结果显示,I + M组患者的平均疼痛减轻程度显著高于I组(3.66±3.17∶1.84±1.53;P < 0.001)。此外,I + M组BPFS的平均增幅显著高于I组(19.44±8.66∶4.75±4.35;P < 0.001)。结论:根据本研究结果,吲哚美辛与甲氨基酚合用能更有效地减轻疼痛强度,改善患者的身体机能(或工作表现)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The main focus of the journal will be on evidence-based drug-related medical researches (with clinical pharmacists’ intervention or documentation), particularly in the Eastern Mediterranean region. However, a wide range of closely related issues will be also covered. These will include clinical studies in the field of pharmaceutical care, reporting adverse drug reactions and human medical toxicology, pharmaco-epidemiology and toxico-epidemiology (poisoning epidemiology), social aspects of pharmacy practice, pharmacy education and economic evaluations of treatment protocols (e.g. cost-effectiveness studies). Local reports of medication utilization studies at hospital or pharmacy levels will only be considered for peer-review process only if they have a new and useful message for the international pharmacy practice professionals and readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信