Prenatal Motivation for Caregiving Issues: A Pilot Study of Mothers Expecting Healthy Infants and Infants With Complex Congenital Heart Disease.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING
Karen Pridham, Anne Chevalier McKechnie, Tondi M Harrison, Roger Brown
{"title":"Prenatal Motivation for Caregiving Issues: A Pilot Study of Mothers Expecting Healthy Infants and Infants With Complex Congenital Heart Disease.","authors":"Karen Pridham, Anne Chevalier McKechnie, Tondi M Harrison, Roger Brown","doi":"10.1891/RTNP-D-20-00101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The prenatal preparing women do for infant caregiving is understudied. In this pilot, multimethods study, we examined motivation for preparing for infant caregiving of women in their third trimester of pregnancy expecting either a healthy infant or an infant with complex congenital heart disease (CCHD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven women expecting a healthy infant and four expecting an infant with CCHD completed a questionnaire and were interviewed. Preparing was reported in context of expectations, intentions, and goals and in personal, family, and infant conditions. Motivation for preparing was expressed through an interview about caregiving issues women were working on. Intensity of motivation was estimated by self-report of the time infant caregiving issues were in thought or action. Effect sizes were calculated for between group differences in motivation intensity. Interview data were examined with directed content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intensity of motivation was higher for women expecting an infant with CCHD for issues of Knowing What and How to prepare. Women expecting an infant with CCHD reported uncertainty about how they would feed their babies given their health condition. Interviews yielded new motivations encompassing issues of family and working with the parent partner.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Assessment of issues women are working on prenatally, indicating motivations for preparing for infant caregiving, and of the intensity of motivations advances culturally-attuned and family-centered preparation. Knowledge of these issues and motivation intensity could orient clinical care to supporting women in developing well-informed expectations, intentions, and goals culturally suited to postnatal learning and infant needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51287,"journal":{"name":"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/RTNP-D-20-00101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: The prenatal preparing women do for infant caregiving is understudied. In this pilot, multimethods study, we examined motivation for preparing for infant caregiving of women in their third trimester of pregnancy expecting either a healthy infant or an infant with complex congenital heart disease (CCHD).

Methods: Eleven women expecting a healthy infant and four expecting an infant with CCHD completed a questionnaire and were interviewed. Preparing was reported in context of expectations, intentions, and goals and in personal, family, and infant conditions. Motivation for preparing was expressed through an interview about caregiving issues women were working on. Intensity of motivation was estimated by self-report of the time infant caregiving issues were in thought or action. Effect sizes were calculated for between group differences in motivation intensity. Interview data were examined with directed content analysis.

Results: Intensity of motivation was higher for women expecting an infant with CCHD for issues of Knowing What and How to prepare. Women expecting an infant with CCHD reported uncertainty about how they would feed their babies given their health condition. Interviews yielded new motivations encompassing issues of family and working with the parent partner.

Implications: Assessment of issues women are working on prenatally, indicating motivations for preparing for infant caregiving, and of the intensity of motivations advances culturally-attuned and family-centered preparation. Knowledge of these issues and motivation intensity could orient clinical care to supporting women in developing well-informed expectations, intentions, and goals culturally suited to postnatal learning and infant needs.

产前护理问题动机:针对健康婴儿和患有复杂先天性心脏病婴儿的母亲的试点研究。
背景和目的:妇女为照顾婴儿所做的产前准备还未得到充分研究。在这项采用多种方法的试验性研究中,我们考察了怀孕三个月的妇女为照顾婴儿做准备的动机,这些妇女怀的是健康婴儿还是患有复杂先天性心脏病(CCHD)的婴儿:11 名怀健康婴儿的妇女和 4 名怀复杂先天性心脏病婴儿的妇女填写了调查问卷并接受了访谈。根据期望、意向和目标以及个人、家庭和婴儿的情况对准备工作进行了报告。通过对妇女正在解决的护理问题进行访谈,表达了准备工作的动机。动机的强度是通过对婴儿护理问题的思考或行动时间的自我报告来估计的。计算了动机强度组间差异的效应大小。对访谈数据进行了定向内容分析:在 "知道准备什么 "和 "如何准备 "这两个问题上,怀有先天性心脏病婴儿的女性的动机强度更高。怀有慢性阻塞性肺病婴儿的妇女表示,考虑到婴儿的健康状况,她们对如何喂养婴儿感到不确定。访谈发现了新的动机,包括家庭和与父母伴侣合作的问题:对妇女在产前正在努力解决的问题进行评估,表明她们为照顾婴儿做准备的动机,以及动机的强度,从而推进与文化相适应和以家庭为中心的准备工作。对这些问题和动机强度的了解可以引导临床护理,以支持妇女在充分知情的情况下制定适合产后学习和婴儿需求的期望、意图和目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research and Theory for Nursing Practice focuses on issues relevant to improving nursing practice, education, and patient care. The articles strive to discuss knowledge development in its broadest sense, reflect research using a variety of methodological approaches, and combine several methods and strategies in a single study. Because of the journal''s international emphasis, article contributors address the implications of their studies for an international audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信