{"title":"Permanent His-bundle pacing using distal His-bundle electrogram-guided approach in patients with atrioventricular block.","authors":"Kazumasa Suga, Hiroyuki Kato, Yasuya Inden, Satoshi Yanagisawa, Hisashi Murakami, Kenji Kada, Naoya Tsuboi, Toyoaki Murohara","doi":"10.1111/pace.14363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Permanent His-bundle pacing (HBP) is effective and safe; however, the success rate of HBP is low, especially in patients with infranodal block. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and feasibility of HBP implantation using an electrophysiological guided approach targeting a distal His-bundle electrogram (HBE) in patients with atrioventricular block (AVB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-four consecutive patients with AVB (infranodal block in 28 patients) who underwent HBP were enrolled. During implantation, we attempted to target the distal part of the HBE (distal HBE) beyond the block site based on unipolar mapping. The His-capture threshold was evaluated for 1 year after implantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HBP was achieved in 26 patients and in 21 patients (75%) with infranodal block. Detection of distal HBE was significantly higher in the successful HBP group than in the HBP failure group (65.4% vs. 0%, p = .001). Among 15 patients with intra-Hisian block, 14 patients (93%) successfully achieved HBP with distal HBE detection. During the 1-year follow-up period, an increase in His-capture threshold by ≥1.0 V at 1.0 ms occurred in five (19.2%) of 26 patients. The increased His-capture threshold group exhibited significantly less detection of distal HBE (20% vs. 76.2%; odds ratio 0.078, 95% confidence interval 0.07-0.87, p = .038) and a higher His-capture threshold at implantation (2.0 ± 1.1 V vs. 1.1 ± 0.9 V; odds ratio 1.702, 95% confidence interval 1.025-2.825, p = 0.04) than the non-increased His-capture threshold group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HBP implantation guided by distal HBE approach may be feasible with subsequent stable pacing in patients with intra-Hisian and atrioventricular nodal block.</p>","PeriodicalId":520740,"journal":{"name":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","volume":" ","pages":"1907-1917"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/pace.14363","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.14363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background: Permanent His-bundle pacing (HBP) is effective and safe; however, the success rate of HBP is low, especially in patients with infranodal block. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and feasibility of HBP implantation using an electrophysiological guided approach targeting a distal His-bundle electrogram (HBE) in patients with atrioventricular block (AVB).
Methods: Thirty-four consecutive patients with AVB (infranodal block in 28 patients) who underwent HBP were enrolled. During implantation, we attempted to target the distal part of the HBE (distal HBE) beyond the block site based on unipolar mapping. The His-capture threshold was evaluated for 1 year after implantation.
Results: HBP was achieved in 26 patients and in 21 patients (75%) with infranodal block. Detection of distal HBE was significantly higher in the successful HBP group than in the HBP failure group (65.4% vs. 0%, p = .001). Among 15 patients with intra-Hisian block, 14 patients (93%) successfully achieved HBP with distal HBE detection. During the 1-year follow-up period, an increase in His-capture threshold by ≥1.0 V at 1.0 ms occurred in five (19.2%) of 26 patients. The increased His-capture threshold group exhibited significantly less detection of distal HBE (20% vs. 76.2%; odds ratio 0.078, 95% confidence interval 0.07-0.87, p = .038) and a higher His-capture threshold at implantation (2.0 ± 1.1 V vs. 1.1 ± 0.9 V; odds ratio 1.702, 95% confidence interval 1.025-2.825, p = 0.04) than the non-increased His-capture threshold group.
Conclusion: HBP implantation guided by distal HBE approach may be feasible with subsequent stable pacing in patients with intra-Hisian and atrioventricular nodal block.
背景:永久性his束起搏(HBP)是安全有效的;然而,HBP的成功率很低,特别是在肠内阻滞的患者中。本研究旨在评估采用电生理引导方法靶向远端his束电图(HBE)在房室传导阻滞(AVB)患者中植入HBP的有效性和可行性。方法:纳入34例连续行HBP的AVB患者(28例为肠内阻滞)。在植入过程中,我们尝试基于单极映射定位block位点以外的HBE远端(远端HBE)。植入后1年评估his捕获阈值。结果:26例患者达到HBP,其中21例(75%)为肠内阻滞。HBP成功组远端HBE检出率明显高于HBP失败组(65.4%比0%,p = .001)。在15例hisian阻滞患者中,14例(93%)成功实现了远端HBE检测的HBP。在1年的随访期间,26例患者中有5例(19.2%)在1.0 ms时his捕获阈值升高≥1.0 V。his捕获阈值升高组远端HBE的检出率明显降低(20% vs. 76.2%;优势比0.078,95%可信区间0.07-0.87,p = 0.038),植入时更高的his捕获阈值(2.0±1.1 V vs 1.1±0.9 V;比值比1.702,95%置信区间1.025-2.825,p = 0.04)高于未增加His-capture阈值组。结论:HBE远端入路引导下的HBP植入对于hiian和房室结阻滞患者是可行的。