The Friendship Bench as a brief psychological intervention with peer support in rural Zimbabwean women: a mixed methods pilot evaluation.

Global mental health (Cambridge, England) Pub Date : 2021-08-26 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1017/gmh.2021.32
Shamiso Fernando, Tim Brown, Kavita Datta, Dzivaidzo Chidhanguro, Naume V Tavengwa, Jaya Chandna, Epiphania Munetsi, Lloyd Dzapasi, Chandiwana Nyachowe, Batsirai Mutasa, Bernard Chasekwa, Robert Ntozini, Dixon Chibanda, Andrew J Prendergast
{"title":"The Friendship Bench as a brief psychological intervention with peer support in rural Zimbabwean women: a mixed methods pilot evaluation.","authors":"Shamiso Fernando, Tim Brown, Kavita Datta, Dzivaidzo Chidhanguro, Naume V Tavengwa, Jaya Chandna, Epiphania Munetsi, Lloyd Dzapasi, Chandiwana Nyachowe, Batsirai Mutasa, Bernard Chasekwa, Robert Ntozini, Dixon Chibanda, Andrew J Prendergast","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2021.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a large treatment gap for common mental disorders in rural areas of low-income countries. We tested the Friendship Bench as a brief psychological intervention delivered by village health workers (VHWs) in rural Zimbabwe.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Rural women identified with depression in a previous trial received weekly home-based problem-solving therapy from VHWs for 6 weeks, and joined a peer-support group. Depression was assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Shona Symptom Questionnaire (SSQ). Acceptability was explored through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. The proportion of women with depression pre- and post-intervention was compared using McNemar's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten VHWs delivered problem-solving therapy to 27 women of mean age 33 years; 25 completed six sessions. Women valued an established and trustful relationship with their VHW, which ensured confidentiality and prevented gossip, and reported finding individual problem-solving therapy beneficial. Peer-support meetings provided space to share problems, solutions and skills. The proportion of women with depression or suicidal ideation on the EPDS declined from 68% to 12% [difference 56% (95% confidence interval (CI) 27.0-85.0); <i>p</i> = 0.001], and the proportion scoring high (>7) on the SSQ declined from 52% to 4% [difference 48% (95% CI 24.4-71.6); <i>p</i> < 0.001] after the 6-week intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VHW-delivered problem-solving therapy and peer-support was acceptable and showed promising results in this pilot evaluation, leading to quantitative and qualitative improvements in mental health among rural Zimbabwean women. Scale-up of the Friendship Bench in rural areas would help close the treatment gap for common mental disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":520633,"journal":{"name":"Global mental health (Cambridge, England)","volume":" ","pages":"e31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8392686/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global mental health (Cambridge, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2021.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a large treatment gap for common mental disorders in rural areas of low-income countries. We tested the Friendship Bench as a brief psychological intervention delivered by village health workers (VHWs) in rural Zimbabwe.

Methods: Rural women identified with depression in a previous trial received weekly home-based problem-solving therapy from VHWs for 6 weeks, and joined a peer-support group. Depression was assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Shona Symptom Questionnaire (SSQ). Acceptability was explored through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. The proportion of women with depression pre- and post-intervention was compared using McNemar's test.

Results: Ten VHWs delivered problem-solving therapy to 27 women of mean age 33 years; 25 completed six sessions. Women valued an established and trustful relationship with their VHW, which ensured confidentiality and prevented gossip, and reported finding individual problem-solving therapy beneficial. Peer-support meetings provided space to share problems, solutions and skills. The proportion of women with depression or suicidal ideation on the EPDS declined from 68% to 12% [difference 56% (95% confidence interval (CI) 27.0-85.0); p = 0.001], and the proportion scoring high (>7) on the SSQ declined from 52% to 4% [difference 48% (95% CI 24.4-71.6); p < 0.001] after the 6-week intervention.

Conclusion: VHW-delivered problem-solving therapy and peer-support was acceptable and showed promising results in this pilot evaluation, leading to quantitative and qualitative improvements in mental health among rural Zimbabwean women. Scale-up of the Friendship Bench in rural areas would help close the treatment gap for common mental disorders.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

友谊长椅作为津巴布韦农村妇女同伴支持的简短心理干预:混合方法试点评价。
背景:低收入国家农村地区常见精神障碍的治疗差距较大。我们测试了友谊长椅作为一种由乡村卫生工作者(VHWs)在津巴布韦农村提供的简短心理干预。方法:在先前的试验中发现患有抑郁症的农村妇女每周接受VHWs的家庭问题解决治疗,为期6周,并加入同伴支持小组。采用爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)和肖纳症状问卷(SSQ)对抑郁进行评估。通过深度访谈和焦点小组讨论探讨可接受性。采用McNemar试验比较干预前后女性抑郁症患者的比例。结果:10名女护士对27名平均年龄33岁的女性进行了问题解决治疗;25人完成了6次会议。女性重视与女上司之间建立起的信任关系,这确保了她们的隐私,防止了流言蜚语,并报告说,她们发现个人解决问题的疗法很有帮助。同侪支持会议提供了分享问题、解决方案和技能的空间。在EPDS中有抑郁或自杀意念的女性比例从68%下降到12%[差异56%(95%可信区间(CI) 27.0-85.0);p = 0.001], SSQ得分高(bb0.7)的比例从52%下降到4%[差值48% (95% CI 24.4-71.6);P < 0.001]。结论:妇女健康中心提供的解决问题疗法和同伴支持是可以接受的,在这一试点评估中显示出有希望的结果,导致津巴布韦农村妇女的心理健康在数量和质量上得到改善。在农村地区扩大友谊长椅将有助于缩小常见精神障碍的治疗差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信