Heritable Cognitive Phenotypes Influence Appetitive Learning but not Extinction in Honey Bees.

IF 3 3区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY
Annals of The Entomological Society of America Pub Date : 2021-07-05 eCollection Date: 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1093/aesa/saab023
Eda Sezen, Emily Dereszkiewicz, Alvin Hozan, Meghan M Bennett, Cahit Ozturk, Brian H Smith, Chelsea N Cook
{"title":"Heritable Cognitive Phenotypes Influence Appetitive Learning but not Extinction in Honey Bees.","authors":"Eda Sezen,&nbsp;Emily Dereszkiewicz,&nbsp;Alvin Hozan,&nbsp;Meghan M Bennett,&nbsp;Cahit Ozturk,&nbsp;Brian H Smith,&nbsp;Chelsea N Cook","doi":"10.1093/aesa/saab023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Learning and attention allow animals to better navigate complex environments. While foraging, honey bees (<i>Apis mellifera</i> L.) learn several aspects of their foraging environment, such as color and odor of flowers, which likely begins to happen before they evaluate the quality of the food. If bees begin to evaluate quality before they taste food, and then learn the food is depleted, this may create a conflict in what the bee learns and remembers. Individual honey bees differ in their sensitivity to information, thus creating variation in how they learn or do not learn certain environmental stimuli. For example, foraging honey bees exhibit differences in latent inhibition (LI), a learning process through which regular encounter with a stimulus without a consequence such as food can later reduce conditioning to that stimulus. Here, we test whether bees from distinct selected LI genotypes learn differently if reinforced via just antennae or via both antennae + proboscis. We also evaluate whether learned information goes extinct at different rates in these distinct LI genetic lines. We find that high LI bees learned significantly better when they were reinforced both antenna + proboscis, while low LI and control bees learned similarly with the two reinforcement pathways. We also find no differences in the acquisition and extinction of learned information in high LI and low LI bees. Our work provides insight into how underlying cognition may influence how honey bees learn and value information, which may lead to differences in how individuals and colonies make foraging decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8076,"journal":{"name":"Annals of The Entomological Society of America","volume":"114 5","pages":"606-613"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8423107/pdf/saab023.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of The Entomological Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/saab023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Learning and attention allow animals to better navigate complex environments. While foraging, honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) learn several aspects of their foraging environment, such as color and odor of flowers, which likely begins to happen before they evaluate the quality of the food. If bees begin to evaluate quality before they taste food, and then learn the food is depleted, this may create a conflict in what the bee learns and remembers. Individual honey bees differ in their sensitivity to information, thus creating variation in how they learn or do not learn certain environmental stimuli. For example, foraging honey bees exhibit differences in latent inhibition (LI), a learning process through which regular encounter with a stimulus without a consequence such as food can later reduce conditioning to that stimulus. Here, we test whether bees from distinct selected LI genotypes learn differently if reinforced via just antennae or via both antennae + proboscis. We also evaluate whether learned information goes extinct at different rates in these distinct LI genetic lines. We find that high LI bees learned significantly better when they were reinforced both antenna + proboscis, while low LI and control bees learned similarly with the two reinforcement pathways. We also find no differences in the acquisition and extinction of learned information in high LI and low LI bees. Our work provides insight into how underlying cognition may influence how honey bees learn and value information, which may lead to differences in how individuals and colonies make foraging decisions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

可遗传的认知表型影响蜜蜂的食欲学习但不影响灭绝。
学习和注意力使动物能够更好地驾驭复杂的环境。在觅食的过程中,蜜蜂(Apis mellifera L.)学习了它们觅食环境的几个方面,比如花的颜色和气味,这些可能在它们评估食物的质量之前就开始发生了。如果蜜蜂在品尝食物之前就开始评估食物的质量,然后得知食物已经耗尽,这可能会在蜜蜂的学习和记忆中产生冲突。个体蜜蜂对信息的敏感度不同,因此在如何学习或不学习某些环境刺激方面存在差异。例如,觅食的蜜蜂在潜在抑制(LI)方面表现出差异,这是一种学习过程,通过这种过程,经常遇到没有食物等后果的刺激,随后会减少对该刺激的条件反射。在这里,我们测试了来自不同LI基因型的蜜蜂,如果只通过触角或同时通过触角+喙进行强化,是否会有不同的学习方式。我们还评估了习得信息在这些不同的LI遗传系中是否以不同的速率灭绝。我们发现,高LI蜜蜂在同时强化天线和喙的情况下学习效果明显更好,而低LI蜜蜂和对照蜜蜂在两种强化途径下学习效果相似。我们还发现,高LI和低LI蜜蜂在习得和习得信息的消除方面没有差异。我们的工作提供了对潜在认知如何影响蜜蜂如何学习和重视信息的见解,这可能导致个体和群体如何做出觅食决定的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of the Entomological Society of America exists to stimulate interdisciplinary dialogue across the entomological disciplines and to advance cooperative interaction among diverse groups of entomologists. It seeks to attract and publish cutting-edge research, reviews, collections of articles on a common topic of broad interest, and discussion of topics with national or international importance. We especially welcome articles covering developing areas of research, controversial issues or debate, and topics of importance to society. Manuscripts that are primarily reports of new species, methodology, pest management, or the biology of single species generally will be referred to other journals of the ESA. The most important criteria for acceptance are quality of work and breadth of interest to the readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信