Medication adherence to direct anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation – A real world analysis

Catarina Brízido, António Miguel Ferreira, Pedro Lopes, Christopher Strong, Gustavo Sá Mendes, Francisco Fernandes Gama, Anaí Durazzo, Gustavo Rocha Rodrigues, Daniel Matos, Sara Guerreiro, Sérgio Madeira, Jorge Ferreira, Pedro Adragão, Miguel Mendes
{"title":"Medication adherence to direct anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation – A real world analysis","authors":"Catarina Brízido,&nbsp;António Miguel Ferreira,&nbsp;Pedro Lopes,&nbsp;Christopher Strong,&nbsp;Gustavo Sá Mendes,&nbsp;Francisco Fernandes Gama,&nbsp;Anaí Durazzo,&nbsp;Gustavo Rocha Rodrigues,&nbsp;Daniel Matos,&nbsp;Sara Guerreiro,&nbsp;Sérgio Madeira,&nbsp;Jorge Ferreira,&nbsp;Pedro Adragão,&nbsp;Miguel Mendes","doi":"10.1016/j.repce.2021.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) changed the landscape of atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment, but also brought with them new challenges in terms of accessibility and compliance. The purpose of this study was to assess adherence to DOACs, and its determinants in a population of AF patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Single-center retrospective study including all patients with non-valvular AF treated with a DOAC from the outpatient general cardiology list at a tertiary center, whose first DOAC prescription was between 1 April 2016 and August 2018. The number of pharmacy refills from the day of first prescription to 31 August 2018 was counted (by means of an electronic prescription platform). Medication refill adherence (MRA) was calculated by dividing the total days' supply by the number of days under therapy. Non-compliance was defined as MRA &lt;90%.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 264 patients (120 men, mean age 74 ± 12 years) met the inclusion criteria. The median CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>VAS<sub>C</sub> score was 3 (interquartile range (IQR) 2-5) and the median HAS-BLED was 1 (IQR 1-2). Rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran and edoxaban were prescribed in 45%, 41%, 24% and 13% of patients, respectively. During the study 51 patients (19%) used at least two DOACs .Patients took DOACs for a median period of 439 days (IQR 269-638), during which the included population adhered to therapy 90% of the time (IQR 75-100%). Half of the patients (51%) were classified as non-compliant; therapy duration (adjusted odds ratio 1.06 per month, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.08, p&lt;0.001), DOACs twice daily (adjusted OR 1.73, 95%CI 1.08-2.75, p=0.022), and higher out-of-pocket costs (adjusted OR 2.13, 95%CI 1.28-3.45, p=0.003) were independent predictors of non-compliance.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Half of the patients (51%) were classified as non-compliant (medication refill adherence &lt;90%). Therapy duration, DOACs twice daily and higher out out-of-pocket costs were independent predictors of non-compliance, which could be targets to improve patient adherence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101121,"journal":{"name":"Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia (English Edition)","volume":"40 9","pages":"Pages 669-675"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.repce.2021.07.002","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2174204921001562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) changed the landscape of atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment, but also brought with them new challenges in terms of accessibility and compliance. The purpose of this study was to assess adherence to DOACs, and its determinants in a population of AF patients.

Methods

Single-center retrospective study including all patients with non-valvular AF treated with a DOAC from the outpatient general cardiology list at a tertiary center, whose first DOAC prescription was between 1 April 2016 and August 2018. The number of pharmacy refills from the day of first prescription to 31 August 2018 was counted (by means of an electronic prescription platform). Medication refill adherence (MRA) was calculated by dividing the total days' supply by the number of days under therapy. Non-compliance was defined as MRA <90%.

Results

A total of 264 patients (120 men, mean age 74 ± 12 years) met the inclusion criteria. The median CHA2DS2VASC score was 3 (interquartile range (IQR) 2-5) and the median HAS-BLED was 1 (IQR 1-2). Rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran and edoxaban were prescribed in 45%, 41%, 24% and 13% of patients, respectively. During the study 51 patients (19%) used at least two DOACs .Patients took DOACs for a median period of 439 days (IQR 269-638), during which the included population adhered to therapy 90% of the time (IQR 75-100%). Half of the patients (51%) were classified as non-compliant; therapy duration (adjusted odds ratio 1.06 per month, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.08, p<0.001), DOACs twice daily (adjusted OR 1.73, 95%CI 1.08-2.75, p=0.022), and higher out-of-pocket costs (adjusted OR 2.13, 95%CI 1.28-3.45, p=0.003) were independent predictors of non-compliance.

Conclusion

Half of the patients (51%) were classified as non-compliant (medication refill adherence <90%). Therapy duration, DOACs twice daily and higher out out-of-pocket costs were independent predictors of non-compliance, which could be targets to improve patient adherence.

非瓣膜性心房颤动患者对直接抗凝药物的依从性——一项真实世界的分析
直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)改变了心房颤动(AF)治疗的格局,但也带来了可及性和依从性方面的新挑战。本研究的目的是评估房颤患者对DOACs的依从性及其决定因素。方法采用单中心回顾性研究,纳入2016年4月1日至2018年8月期间在某三级中心门诊普通心脏病学名单中首次使用DOAC治疗的所有非瓣膜性房颤患者。统计自首次开处方之日起至2018年8月31日止药房补药次数(通过电子处方平台)。药物补充依从性(MRA)通过总供应天数除以治疗天数来计算。不符合定义为MRA <90%。结果264例患者(男性120例,平均年龄74 ± 12岁)符合纳入标准。CHA2DS2VASC评分中位数为3(四分位范围(IQR) 2-5), ha - bled评分中位数为1 (IQR 1-2)。利伐沙班、阿哌沙班、达比加群和依多沙班分别占45%、41%、24%和13%。在研究期间,51名患者(19%)至少使用了两种DOACs。患者服用DOACs的中位时间为439天(IQR 269-638),在此期间,纳入的人群有90%的时间(IQR 75-100%)坚持治疗。一半的患者(51%)被归类为不依从性;治疗持续时间(调整后的优势比为1.06 /月,95%可信区间(CI) 1.03-1.08, p<0.001)、每日两次DOACs(调整后的OR为1.73,95%CI为1.08-2.75,p=0.022)和较高的自费费用(调整后的OR为2.13,95%CI为1.28-3.45,p=0.003)是不依从性的独立预测因素。结论半数(51%)患者属于不依从性(药物补充依从性占90%)。治疗持续时间、每日两次doac和较高的自付费用是不依从性的独立预测因素,这可能是提高患者依从性的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信