A review of executive functioning challenges and strengths in autistic adults.

The Clinical neuropsychologist Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-09 DOI:10.1080/13854046.2021.1971767
Tanya St John, Sara Woods, Tammara Bode, Cassidy Ritter, Annette Estes
{"title":"A review of executive functioning challenges and strengths in autistic adults.","authors":"Tanya St John,&nbsp;Sara Woods,&nbsp;Tammara Bode,&nbsp;Cassidy Ritter,&nbsp;Annette Estes","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2021.1971767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> There has been a steady rise in research characterizing executive functioning (EF) impairments in autistic individuals but limited research investigating EF strengths. This review provides a summary of current EF research in autistic adults with a focus on EF challenges and strengths and potential sources of heterogeneity in research findings. New avenues for addressing gaps in our understanding of EF strengths are proposed.<b>Method:</b> A review of the EF literature was conducted. One hundred twenty-four studies of inhibition, working memory, cognitive flexibility, fluency, planning, decision-making, and subjective measures of EF in autistic adults were included.<b>Results:</b> Autistic adults with average intellectual functioning demonstrate difficulties with cognitive flexibility, phonemic fluency, and working memory. Strengths in planning, decision-making, and semantic verbal fluency were evident in some but not all studies. Findings regarding inhibition are inconclusive. Key findings across each EF domain are discussed and sources of potential heterogeneity across studies were evaluated. The type of measure used appears to contribute to heterogeneous findings. Subjective EF measures revealed more consistent findings of deficits in autistic adults than objective EF measures.<b>Conclusions:</b> Research reveals areas of EF weaknesses as well as strengths in autistic adults. Unlike EF challenges, EF strengths are not well understood. Future research identifying EF strengths is needed to improve services and supports for autistic adults. Further investigation of potential factors that interact with or constrain EF such as comorbid disorders, verbal ability, sensory processing, and other factors specific to autism will be critical to move the field forward and increase understanding of how EF is related to everyday functioning in autistic adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":197334,"journal":{"name":"The Clinical neuropsychologist","volume":" ","pages":"1116-1147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Clinical neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2021.1971767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Objective: There has been a steady rise in research characterizing executive functioning (EF) impairments in autistic individuals but limited research investigating EF strengths. This review provides a summary of current EF research in autistic adults with a focus on EF challenges and strengths and potential sources of heterogeneity in research findings. New avenues for addressing gaps in our understanding of EF strengths are proposed.Method: A review of the EF literature was conducted. One hundred twenty-four studies of inhibition, working memory, cognitive flexibility, fluency, planning, decision-making, and subjective measures of EF in autistic adults were included.Results: Autistic adults with average intellectual functioning demonstrate difficulties with cognitive flexibility, phonemic fluency, and working memory. Strengths in planning, decision-making, and semantic verbal fluency were evident in some but not all studies. Findings regarding inhibition are inconclusive. Key findings across each EF domain are discussed and sources of potential heterogeneity across studies were evaluated. The type of measure used appears to contribute to heterogeneous findings. Subjective EF measures revealed more consistent findings of deficits in autistic adults than objective EF measures.Conclusions: Research reveals areas of EF weaknesses as well as strengths in autistic adults. Unlike EF challenges, EF strengths are not well understood. Future research identifying EF strengths is needed to improve services and supports for autistic adults. Further investigation of potential factors that interact with or constrain EF such as comorbid disorders, verbal ability, sensory processing, and other factors specific to autism will be critical to move the field forward and increase understanding of how EF is related to everyday functioning in autistic adults.

自闭症成人执行功能的挑战与优势。
目的:关于自闭症个体执行功能障碍的研究稳步上升,但关于执行功能优势的研究有限。本文综述了目前自闭症成人EF研究的概况,重点介绍了EF的挑战和优势以及研究结果的潜在异质性来源。提出了解决我们对英语优势理解差距的新途径。方法:回顾EF相关文献。包括124项关于自闭症成人EF的抑制、工作记忆、认知灵活性、流畅性、计划、决策和主观测量的研究。结果:智力正常的自闭症成年人在认知灵活性、音位流畅性和工作记忆方面表现出困难。在计划,决策和语义语言流畅性方面的优势在一些但不是所有的研究中都很明显。关于抑制的发现尚无定论。讨论了每个EF域的关键发现,并评估了研究中潜在异质性的来源。所使用的测量类型似乎有助于异质的发现。主观EF测量比客观EF测量更一致地揭示了自闭症成人的缺陷。结论:研究揭示了自闭症成年人在英语方面的弱点和优势。与EF的挑战不同,EF的优势并没有得到很好的理解。未来的研究需要确定EF的优势,以改善对自闭症成年人的服务和支持。进一步研究与EF相互作用或限制EF的潜在因素,如共病障碍、语言能力、感觉处理和其他自闭症特有的因素,对于推动该领域的发展和增加对EF如何与自闭症成人的日常功能相关的理解至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书