Evaluating the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance of the Resistance Training for Teens program.

IF 5.5
Sarah G Kennedy, Jordan J Smith, Paul A Estabrooks, Nicole Nathan, Michael Noetel, Philip J Morgan, Jo Salmon, Gessika C Dos Santos, David R Lubans
{"title":"Evaluating the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance of the Resistance Training for Teens program.","authors":"Sarah G Kennedy,&nbsp;Jordan J Smith,&nbsp;Paul A Estabrooks,&nbsp;Nicole Nathan,&nbsp;Michael Noetel,&nbsp;Philip J Morgan,&nbsp;Jo Salmon,&nbsp;Gessika C Dos Santos,&nbsp;David R Lubans","doi":"10.1186/s12966-021-01195-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical activity guidelines recommend young people engage in regular muscle-strengthening activities (e.g., resistance training [RT]). However, few school-based physical activity interventions have been delivered at-scale or promoted RT. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance of the Resistance Training for Teens (RT for Teens) program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected between August 2015 and October 2020. RE-AIM was operationalized as: (i) Reach: number and characteristics of students estimated to be exposed to the program; (ii) Effectiveness: impact of the program on student-level outcomes measured in a subsample of 750 students from 17 schools; (iii) Adoption: number and representativeness of schools with one or more teachers trained to deliver the program; (iv) Implementation: extent to which the program was delivered as intended; and (v) Maintenance: extent to which the program was sustained in schools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The estimated program reach was ~ 10,000 students, out of a total student population of ~ 200,000 (~ 5%). Students were from diverse socioeconomic and ethnic backgrounds. Improvements in muscular fitness, RT self-efficacy, perceived cardiorespiratory fitness and flexibility, and participation in muscle-strengthening physical activities were documented. A total of 30 workshops were delivered, involving 468 teachers from 249 schools from diverse geographical regions. Implementation varied considerably, with teachers adapting the program to suit the context of their school and student cohorts. However, RT skill development and the promotion of muscular fitness were the session components delivered most during sessions. Teachers' adherence to the SAAFE (Supportive, Active, Autonomous, Fair and Enjoyable) teaching principles was high. Approximately 30% of teachers (144/476) registered to use the RT for Teens app. At the school-level, 37% (93/249) of schools had at least one registered user (teacher and/or student). A total of 2,336 workouts and 3,116 fitness tests were completed by registered users. Of the 249 schools represented, 51 (20.5%) sent an additional (previously untrained) teacher to a second workshop.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The RT for Teens program had broad reach and adoption. However, intervention delivery varied considerably across schools and additional support strategies are required to optimize intervention implementation and maintain program delivery over time. Future studies will benefit from the utilization of accepted frameworks, recommendations and guidelines for implementation research.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621000352808), retrospectively registered 1<sup>st</sup> February 2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":520799,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity","volume":" ","pages":"122"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425054/pdf/","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01195-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: Physical activity guidelines recommend young people engage in regular muscle-strengthening activities (e.g., resistance training [RT]). However, few school-based physical activity interventions have been delivered at-scale or promoted RT. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance of the Resistance Training for Teens (RT for Teens) program.

Methods: Data were collected between August 2015 and October 2020. RE-AIM was operationalized as: (i) Reach: number and characteristics of students estimated to be exposed to the program; (ii) Effectiveness: impact of the program on student-level outcomes measured in a subsample of 750 students from 17 schools; (iii) Adoption: number and representativeness of schools with one or more teachers trained to deliver the program; (iv) Implementation: extent to which the program was delivered as intended; and (v) Maintenance: extent to which the program was sustained in schools.

Results: The estimated program reach was ~ 10,000 students, out of a total student population of ~ 200,000 (~ 5%). Students were from diverse socioeconomic and ethnic backgrounds. Improvements in muscular fitness, RT self-efficacy, perceived cardiorespiratory fitness and flexibility, and participation in muscle-strengthening physical activities were documented. A total of 30 workshops were delivered, involving 468 teachers from 249 schools from diverse geographical regions. Implementation varied considerably, with teachers adapting the program to suit the context of their school and student cohorts. However, RT skill development and the promotion of muscular fitness were the session components delivered most during sessions. Teachers' adherence to the SAAFE (Supportive, Active, Autonomous, Fair and Enjoyable) teaching principles was high. Approximately 30% of teachers (144/476) registered to use the RT for Teens app. At the school-level, 37% (93/249) of schools had at least one registered user (teacher and/or student). A total of 2,336 workouts and 3,116 fitness tests were completed by registered users. Of the 249 schools represented, 51 (20.5%) sent an additional (previously untrained) teacher to a second workshop.

Conclusions: The RT for Teens program had broad reach and adoption. However, intervention delivery varied considerably across schools and additional support strategies are required to optimize intervention implementation and maintain program delivery over time. Future studies will benefit from the utilization of accepted frameworks, recommendations and guidelines for implementation research.

Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621000352808), retrospectively registered 1st February 2021.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评估青少年抗阻训练计划的范围、有效性、采用、实施和维护。
背景:体育活动指南建议年轻人定期进行肌肉强化活动(如阻力训练[RT])。然而,很少以学校为基础的体育活动干预措施被大规模地提供或促进了抗阻训练。本研究的目的是评估青少年抗阻训练(青少年抗阻训练)计划的范围、有效性、采用、实施和维护。方法:数据采集时间为2015年8月至2020年10月。RE-AIM的操作如下:(i)覆盖范围:预计将接触该计划的学生的数量和特征;(ii)有效性:在17所学校的750名学生的子样本中测量该项目对学生水平成果的影响;(iii)采用情况:有一名或多名教师接受过授课培训的学校的数量和代表性;执行情况:方案按预期交付的程度;(v)维持:项目在学校维持的程度。结果:在20万学生总数中(约占5%),估计项目覆盖了约1万名学生。学生们来自不同的社会经济和种族背景。肌肉健康、RT自我效能、感知心肺健康和灵活性以及参与肌肉强化体育活动的改善均被记录在案。共举办了30个讲习班,涉及来自不同地理区域的249所学校的468名教师。实施情况各不相同,教师需要根据学校和学生群体的情况对项目进行调整。然而,RT技能的发展和肌肉健康的促进是在会议期间提供的最多的会议内容。教师对SAAFE(支持性、主动、自主、公平、愉快)教学原则的坚持程度较高。大约30%的教师(144/476)注册使用RT for Teens应用程序。在学校层面,37%(93/249)的学校至少有一名注册用户(教师和/或学生)。注册用户共完成了2336次锻炼和3116次体能测试。在所代表的249所学校中,51所(20.5%)额外派遣了一名(以前未受过培训的)教师参加第二次讲习班。结论:青少年RT项目具有广泛的影响力和采用率。然而,干预措施的实施在各个学校之间差异很大,需要额外的支持策略来优化干预措施的实施,并随着时间的推移保持项目的实施。今后的研究将受益于利用公认的框架、建议和准则进行执行研究。试验注册:澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心(ACTRN12621000352808),回顾性注册于2021年2月1日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书