Creating a Research Ethics Consultation Service: Issues to Consider

Q2 Social Sciences
Holly A. Taylor, Kathryn M. Porter, Erin Talati Paquette, Jennifer B. McCormick, Emma Tumilty, Jason F. Arnold, Kayte Spector-Bagdady, Marion Danis, Debra Brandt, Jina Shah, Benjamin S. Wilfond, Lisa M. Lee
{"title":"Creating a Research Ethics Consultation Service: Issues to Consider","authors":"Holly A. Taylor,&nbsp;Kathryn M. Porter,&nbsp;Erin Talati Paquette,&nbsp;Jennifer B. McCormick,&nbsp;Emma Tumilty,&nbsp;Jason F. Arnold,&nbsp;Kayte Spector-Bagdady,&nbsp;Marion Danis,&nbsp;Debra Brandt,&nbsp;Jina Shah,&nbsp;Benjamin S. Wilfond,&nbsp;Lisa M. Lee","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article provides pragmatic advice for organizations interested in creating a research ethics consultation service (RECS). A robust RECS has the potential to build capacity among investigators to identify and consider the ethical issues they encounter while conducting their research. Determining whether to establish an RECS should begin with an institutional-needs assessment that includes three key questions: What are the current resources available to research teams to navigate ethical concerns that arise from their research? Is there a demand or perceived need for more resources? Is there institutional support (financial and otherwise) to establish and maintain an RECS? If this results in the decision to establish the consultation service, relevant institutional stakeholders must be identified and consulted, and personnel with the requisite skills recruited. The next step is to establish an RECS and build the infrastructure to process and respond to requests. The RECS's long-term sustainability will depend on a stable source of funding and a mechanism to receive constructive feedback to ensure that the service is meeting the institutional needs it set out to address.</p>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"43 5","pages":"18-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/eahr.500101","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics & human research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eahr.500101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article provides pragmatic advice for organizations interested in creating a research ethics consultation service (RECS). A robust RECS has the potential to build capacity among investigators to identify and consider the ethical issues they encounter while conducting their research. Determining whether to establish an RECS should begin with an institutional-needs assessment that includes three key questions: What are the current resources available to research teams to navigate ethical concerns that arise from their research? Is there a demand or perceived need for more resources? Is there institutional support (financial and otherwise) to establish and maintain an RECS? If this results in the decision to establish the consultation service, relevant institutional stakeholders must be identified and consulted, and personnel with the requisite skills recruited. The next step is to establish an RECS and build the infrastructure to process and respond to requests. The RECS's long-term sustainability will depend on a stable source of funding and a mechanism to receive constructive feedback to ensure that the service is meeting the institutional needs it set out to address.

创建研究伦理咨询服务:需要考虑的问题
本文为有兴趣创建研究伦理咨询服务(RECS)的组织提供了实用的建议。一个强大的RECS有可能在研究人员中建立能力,以识别和考虑他们在进行研究时遇到的伦理问题。决定是否建立RECS应该从机构需求评估开始,包括三个关键问题:研究团队目前有哪些可用资源来处理他们研究中出现的伦理问题?是否存在对更多资源的需求或感知需求?是否有机构支持(财政和其他方面)来建立和维持区域经济合作体系?如果这导致决定建立咨询服务,则必须确定和咨询相关的机构利益相关者,并招聘具有必要技能的人员。下一步是建立RECS并构建处理和响应请求的基础设施。RECS的长期可持续性将取决于稳定的资金来源和接受建设性反馈的机制,以确保该服务满足其着手解决的机构需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethics & human research
Ethics & human research Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信