An Intersectional Mixed Methods Approach to Understand American Indian Men's Health.

Q2 Social Sciences
Ka'imi Sinclair, Kelly Gonzales, Claire Woosley, Tish Rivera Cree, Celina M Garza, Dedra Buchwald
{"title":"An Intersectional Mixed Methods Approach to Understand American Indian Men's Health.","authors":"Ka'imi Sinclair,&nbsp;Kelly Gonzales,&nbsp;Claire Woosley,&nbsp;Tish Rivera Cree,&nbsp;Celina M Garza,&nbsp;Dedra Buchwald","doi":"10.22374/ijmsch.v3i2.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study used a parallel convergent mixed methods design with TribalCrit theory and intersectionality as analytical frameworks to identify how American Indian men's identities intersect with broader structures and systems to shape their eating and physical activity choices and behaviors, and to elicit recommendations for a men's lifestyle intervention. AI men were recruited in Minneapolis, Minnesota and Portland, Oregon between March and December 2017 and in Phoenix, Arizona in December 2019 to participate in a survey and focus groups. The survey included demographic questions and questions about physical and cultural activities men engage in, perceived social support for lifestyle behaviors, masculine characteristics, and values important to American Indian men. The 6-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale was used to assess psychological distress. Focus groups were audio recorded and transcribed for a phenomenological analysis. Descriptive statistics and correlations were computed for survey data. We conducted 15 focus groups with 151 adult American Indian men in three urban sites. The mean age of participants ranged from 36-51 across the sites; 7%-32% were college graduates; 13%-22% were currently married and 28%-41% were working full time. The most important values reported by participants were being: strong mentally and emotionally, a good parent, responsible, spiritual, and a good spouse or partner. On the K6 psychological distress scale, 63%-70% scored ≥5 but <13 (moderate mental distress), and 8%-15% scored ≥13 indicating severe mental distress. Younger age was significantly correlated with higher mean K6 score (p < .0001). Colonizers and missionaries that settled in the U.S. imposed cultural and gender hegemony which enforced a patriarchal capitalist system that have had long-lasting and deleterious effects on American Indians, particularly American Indian men.</p>","PeriodicalId":52382,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Men''s Social and Community Health","volume":"3 2","pages":"e66-e89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8415758/pdf/nihms-1727577.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Men''s Social and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22374/ijmsch.v3i2.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study used a parallel convergent mixed methods design with TribalCrit theory and intersectionality as analytical frameworks to identify how American Indian men's identities intersect with broader structures and systems to shape their eating and physical activity choices and behaviors, and to elicit recommendations for a men's lifestyle intervention. AI men were recruited in Minneapolis, Minnesota and Portland, Oregon between March and December 2017 and in Phoenix, Arizona in December 2019 to participate in a survey and focus groups. The survey included demographic questions and questions about physical and cultural activities men engage in, perceived social support for lifestyle behaviors, masculine characteristics, and values important to American Indian men. The 6-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale was used to assess psychological distress. Focus groups were audio recorded and transcribed for a phenomenological analysis. Descriptive statistics and correlations were computed for survey data. We conducted 15 focus groups with 151 adult American Indian men in three urban sites. The mean age of participants ranged from 36-51 across the sites; 7%-32% were college graduates; 13%-22% were currently married and 28%-41% were working full time. The most important values reported by participants were being: strong mentally and emotionally, a good parent, responsible, spiritual, and a good spouse or partner. On the K6 psychological distress scale, 63%-70% scored ≥5 but <13 (moderate mental distress), and 8%-15% scored ≥13 indicating severe mental distress. Younger age was significantly correlated with higher mean K6 score (p < .0001). Colonizers and missionaries that settled in the U.S. imposed cultural and gender hegemony which enforced a patriarchal capitalist system that have had long-lasting and deleterious effects on American Indians, particularly American Indian men.

了解美国印第安人男性健康的交叉混合方法。
这项研究使用了一种平行收敛的混合方法设计,以TribalCrit理论和交叉性作为分析框架,以确定美国印度男性的身份如何与更广泛的结构和系统交叉,从而塑造他们的饮食和体育活动选择和行为,并为男性的生活方式干预提出建议。2017年3月至12月,人工智能男性在明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯市和俄勒冈州波特兰市被招募,2019年12月在亚利桑那州凤凰城被招募参加调查和焦点小组。这项调查包括人口统计学问题和关于男性参与的体育和文化活动、对生活方式行为的社会支持、男性特征和对美国印度男性重要的价值观的问题。采用6项Kessler心理困扰量表评定心理困扰。对焦点小组进行录音和转录,以进行现象学分析。对调查数据进行描述性统计和相关性计算。我们在三个城市地点对151名成年美国印第安人进行了15个焦点小组的调查。参与者的平均年龄在36-51岁之间;大学毕业生占7%-32%;13%至22%的人目前已婚,28%至41%的人全职工作。参与者报告的最重要的价值观是:坚强的精神和情感,一个好的父母,负责任,有精神,以及一个好配偶或伴侣。在K6心理困扰量表中,63%-70%的人得分≥5,但
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信